If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
SAYS WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IS UNDENIABLY “UN-SCIENTIFIC”
by John Charlton
(Nov. 26, 2009) — The saga of the conspiracy to fake data to promote Agenda 21, the radical socialist attack on Western Civilization, continues to unfold, with a call, now, from a leading radical, pro-climate-changer, that those involved in the conspiracy resign.
George Monbiot’s call for resignations was published yesterday in the Guardian. In that article he wrote the follow scathing attack on Dr. Jones and the others exposed for fraud when their emails were leaked by Russian hackers:
When it comes to his handling of Freedom of Information requests, Professor Jones might struggle even to use a technical defence. If you take the wording literally, in one case he appears to be suggesting that emails subject to a request be deleted, which means that he seems to be advocating potentially criminal activity. Even if no other message had been hacked, this would be sufficient to ensure his resignation as head of the unit.
I feel desperately sorry for him: he must be walking through hell. But there is no helping it; he has to go, and the longer he leaves it, the worse it will get. He has a few days left in which to make an honourable exit. Otherwise, like the former Speaker of the House of Commons, Michael Martin, he will linger on until his remaining credibility vanishes, inflicting continuing damage to climate science.
Some people say that I am romanticising science, that it is never as open and honest as the Popperian ideal. Perhaps. But I know that opaqueness and secrecy are the enemies of science. There is a word for the apparent repeated attempts to prevent disclosure revealed in these emails: unscientific.
Prior to this, Monbiot excerpted a very damning statement by Dr. Jones, whose resignation he is calling for:
One of the most damaging emails was sent by the head of the climatic research unit, Phil Jones. He wrote “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!
Such is the public interest in understanding the conspiracy that there is already a website which publishes all the emails, the most incriminating of which, as regards charges of conspiracy to commit fraud, you can read on line here:
Phil Jones wrote:
> Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
> Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
> Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t
> have his new email address.
> We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.
> I see that CA claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature
Monbiot is outraged that his fake religion has been shown for what it is: fake science. His outrage is so palpable that he felt obligated to mock a fake email, rather than address, first, the really embarrassing, real ones. But he refuses to admit that the forces of nature are greater than any man can harness or effect at his present level of technological advancement. If CO2 levels fluctuated wildly before the modern period, then there is no reason to believe that the industrial revolution had anything to do with it.
That’s, alas, the common sense Monbiot and his fellow climatology gurus have forgotten.