If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
PRESENCE CITED AS MATERIAL FACT TO EX-PARTE DISCUSSIONS TO SWAY LAND
by John Charlton
(Oct. 3, 2009) — It boggles the mind, that for an obscure case in the Middle District of Georgia, Federal Court, involving a lead counsel who has been derided from one end of the nation to the other as a nut, crazy woman, “birther” and “Queen-bee of the birther movement”, the U.S. Attorney General himself, Eric Holder, should be seen walking into a local eatery, without a personal security detail, just to be in town for the hearing.
This allegation is made in the affidavit of Mr. Robert D. Douglas, dated Sept. 26, sworn before Mr. Lamar Rozier, notary public in the state of Georgia, Bacon County, submitted in support of Attorney Orly Taitz’s latest Motion of Recusal against Judge Clay D. Land.
His affidavit reads as follows:
BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary, Lamar Rozier
on this 26th day of September, 2009, personally appeared Robert D. Douglas, known to me to be a credible person and of lawful age, who being by me first duly shown on his oath deposes and says:
On the day of he hearing for Major Stephan Cook before Federal Judge Clay D. Land, Columbus, Ga., my wife, my wife’s sister, her husband and I had entered the little coffee shop directly across from the Court House while waiting for the doors to open to the public. I was sitting in the small seating area, set aside for their customers, while facing and looking directly at the entrance to the shop. All persons entering had to pass withing 8-10 feet from where I was sitting.
I looked up and immediately recognized an individual entering and approaching the serving counter, due to his well known TV displayed distinguishing features: his trim upper lip mustache, not large of stature and general olive complexion. I knew instantly it was non other than Eric Holder, the current Attorney General of the United States. I called this to the attention of those present and all agreed it appeared to be who I readily recognized. He entered unguarded, no accompanying entourage and probably thought he would not be recognized.
Red flags went up immediately in my mind and the questions remain, as yet. Why does the Attorney General of the United States need to be present in an obscure hearing well of his beaten path? Could it possible be, since Holder did not present himself in open court, he may have had a little “whisper in the ear” to a Federal Judge in order to bias his judicial vision and adhere to the President’s agenda of obstruction?
Only Judge Clay D. Land can answer those question.
Robert D. Douglas
Holder’s presence is not that unbelievable, because quite contrary to the logic of their position Obama supporters have consistently shown irrational passion to defend Obama from what they claim are ridiculous charges.
Update 10/04/2009 — 6:30 PM EDST:
Indeed, the lengths Obama’s supporters will go to deny the facts, can be seen from one comment at The Right Side of Life, where it is claimed that this affidavit, transcribed above, has not been submitted as evidence on Judge Land’s Docket. Also in the comment section of TRSOL article, there is a link to Holder’s schedule for the day, which leaves a seemingly 18 hour window between 9PM July 15th, and 3 PM, July 16th, Eastern Daylight Savings Time.