EX-NAIDER RAIDER CITES COMPLEXITY OF ISSUES
By John Charlton
(October 2, 2009) — This evening Judge Jerome B. Simandle responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s Letter of Inquiry, on behalf of the Plaintiffs, in the case Kerchner et al. vs. Obama et al.. Attorney Apuzzo’s letter had inquired regarding the Judge’s delay on two motions before his bench.
In his reply, Judge Simandle cites his need to complete his own legal research of the issues, and affirms that he is working on his decision, and that many issues were raised by both sides.
The case Kerchner vs. Obama is a case of first instance, regarding the right of military plaintiffs to seek mandamus regarding their de facto Commander-in-Chief, via the Article III Judiciary on the grounds of usurpation of office. While it is legally impossible to deny the crime of usurpation, on account of the public admission by Obama of a British subject as a father, and the 4 Supreme Court cases citing the definition of a natural born citizen, which definition requires 2 american citizen parents; a ruling in this case against Obama would be a shock to the political establishment, which has with widespread distain and indifference presumed on its own authority to govern the nation at it sees fit, without regard to the requirements established by the U.S. Constitution, in Article II, Section i, paragraph 5.