The Curious Incident of the Justices Who Did Not Bark!!!

HAS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RENDERED ITSELF IRRELEVANT? by jtx (Dec. 7, 2010) — It seems that history – and literature – are known to repeat themselves. I refer to the short story printed in 1894 by a certain A. C. Doyle entitled “Silver Blaze” which contains what must be one of the better-known Sherlock […]

Opposition Brief does not address Kerchner case

BUT RATHER, A SELF-SERVING ONE OF THEIR OWN CREATION Guest Editorial (Mar. 15, 2010) — Fool me once, shame on you… The present response by the defense in the Kerchner et al action genuinely reminds one of the above idiom in that the defense counsel had already used what amounts to the same response in […]

Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny

Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny

ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND Legal Analysis by John Charlton (March 9, 2010) — Many U.S. Citizens have not awakened to the fact that the U.S.A. is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a tyrannical state, overthrown from the very day Chief Justice […]

Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress Appeal

Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress Appeal

BRIEF IN THIS LANDMARK CASE IS A MASTERPIECE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND RIGHTS by John Charlton (Jan. 20, 2010) — Yesterday, Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the opening brief on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. This case regards the evident […]

Apuzzo on the D.C. Code's Quo warranto provisions

IN REGARD TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Attorney Leo Deonofrio has been leading a crusading effort to clarify the understanding of, publicize and advocate the use of the D.C. Quo warranto provisions.  Recently he has commented at his blog, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com, about the D.C. code and the Barnett vs. Obama case, and responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s previous […]

Kerchner Appeals!

NATIONAL SECURITY DEMANDS A HEARING ON THE MERITS! by John Charlton (Oct. 27, 2009) — Attorney Mario Apuzzo, esq., announced this afternoon at 2:45 PM ET that the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. v. Obama & Congress et al.. have appealed their case to the 3rd Circuit Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiffs in the […]

Letter to the Editor — Oct. 26, 2009

Your dereliction of duty is contemptible, but we will prevail! by Sharon Rondeau Dear Editor, I am sending Judge Simandle this letter, today, in the mail: October 24, 2009 U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle U.S. Courthouse Fourth & Cooper Streets Camden, NJ  08101 Dear Judge Simandle: RE:  KERCHNER V. OBAMA I am appalled that […]

Simandle the Anarchist

EX-NAIDER RAIDER ATTACKS REASON AND JUSTICE, TO SUPPORT TYRANNY Legal analysis by John Charlton (Oct. 23, 2009)  —  Judge Jerome B. Simandle took 2 months to write his eleven page Opinion, granting the Motion to Dismiss in the case Kerchner vs. Obama.  But in the final analysis, his ruling was just that: an “opinion,” without […]

Simandle's 4 strikes against the U.S. Constitution

RULING IN KERCHNER VS OBAMA, TO DIMISS CASE CRITIQUED legal analysis and critique by an anonymous patriot (Oct. 22, 2009) –  Federal Judge Jerome B. Simandle’s ruling to grant the govt.’s Motion to Dismiss, in the case Kerchner vs. Obama, is not only a clear violation of the laws of the country but also a […]

Orly Taitz speaks with The Post & Email – Part I

DISCUSSES LIFE, 2008 ELECTION, CASES, & JUDICIARY by Sharon Rondeau (Oct. 22, 2009) — Here follows the transcript of The Post & Email’s interview with Dr. Orly Taitz, esq., lead counsel in the case Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Barack Hussein Obama et al., in Santa Ana Federal Court.  The Post & Email has […]

Kerchner on Simandle's Ruling

LEAD PLAINTIFF DECRIES OVERTHROW OF CONSTITUTION by John Charlton (Oct. 21, 2009) — Moments ago, Commander Charles F. Kerchner, U.S. Naval Reserve (Ret.) issued the following statement — exclusive to The Post & Email — in response to Judge Jerome B. Simandle’s dismissal of his case: The monarchy/federal government has now spoken, with the complicity […]

Simandle turns and runs: Dismisses Kerchner vs. Obama

BETRAYS LEGACY OF NAIDER’S RAIDERS, SIDES WITH TYRANNY & GOVT. SECRECY by John Charlton (Oct. 21, 2009) — It’s another judicial cop-out; but from a surprising quarter:  Judge Jerome B. Simandle, who began his citizen advocacy and legal career as a Naider’s raider, has sided with tyranny by granting the Motion to Dismiss, in the […]

CDR Kerchner, "On the Sovereign and Sovereign Immunity"

ARGUES FOR RIGHTS OF ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ AS ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY TO NATIONAL CRISIS by John Charlton (Oct. 20, 2009) — Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., U.S. Naval Reserve (Retired), issued a public statement today in favor of the sovereign rights of the citizens of the United States against governmental usurpation as the unique and […]

The 7th Circuit Court's Argument against Quo Warranto's use

AND ITS APPLICABLITY TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Legal Summary & Analysis by John Charlton (Oct. 8, 2009) — Yesterday, Attorney Leo Donofrio brought again to the attention of the Nation, the existence of a case in the Federal 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which strangely was not cited by acting Attorney General George S. Cardona, in […]

Simandle responds to Apuzzo

EX-NAIDER RAIDER CITES COMPLEXITY OF ISSUES By John Charlton (October 2, 2009) — This evening Judge Jerome B. Simandle responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s Letter of Inquiry, on behalf of the Plaintiffs, in the case Kerchner et al. vs. Obama et al..  Attorney Apuzzo’s letter had inquired regarding the Judge’s delay on two motions before […]

Apuzzo files Letter of Inquiry to Judge Simandle

DELAY IN CASE IS REASONABLE MOTIVE TO ASK FOR ACTION by John Charlton (Oct. 1, 2009) —  Attorney Mario Apuzzo, esq., counsel for the plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama et al., has filed a “Letter of Inquiry” before Judge Jerome B. Simandle, inquiring as to the delay in ruling on two motions in […]