Tag: Kerchner vs. Obama

  • The Curious Incident of the Justices Who Did Not Bark!!!

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    HAS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RENDERED ITSELF IRRELEVANT? by jtx (Dec. 7, 2010) — It seems that history – and literature – are known to repeat themselves. I refer to the short story printed in 1894 by a certain A. C. Doyle entitled “Silver Blaze” which contains what must be one of the better-known Sherlock…

  • Opposition Brief does not address Kerchner case

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    BUT RATHER, A SELF-SERVING ONE OF THEIR OWN CREATION Guest Editorial (Mar. 15, 2010) — Fool me once, shame on you… The present response by the defense in the Kerchner et al action genuinely reminds one of the above idiom in that the defense counsel had already used what amounts to the same response in…

  • Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny

    Department of Justice embraces Obama’s Politics of Tyranny

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    ARGUES IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA APPELLEE BRIEF THAT U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT THE LAW OF THE LAND Legal Analysis by John Charlton (March 9, 2010) — Many U.S. Citizens have not awakened to the fact that the U.S.A. is no longer a Constitutional Republic, but a tyrannical state, overthrown from the very day Chief Justice…

  • Kerchner case will test Third Circuit Court’s adherence to the Constitution

    Kerchner case will test Third Circuit Court’s adherence to the Constitution

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    APPELLANTS’ BRIEF LEAVES NO WIGGLE ROOM by John Charlton (Feb. 13, 2010) — Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress is without doubt a case that will go down in the history books of law, and the Appellate Brief written by Attorney Mario Apuzzo, Esq., is a veritable treasure trove of Constitutional Law and interpretation…

  • Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress Appeal

    Apuzzo files opening brief in Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress Appeal

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    BRIEF IN THIS LANDMARK CASE IS A MASTERPIECE ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND RIGHTS by John Charlton (Jan. 20, 2010) — Yesterday, Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed the opening brief on behalf of the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. This case regards the evident…

  • 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals sets date for Kerchner vs. Obama & Congress

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    BRIEFS DUE BY JANUARY 4TH, 2010 by John Charlton (Nov. 25, 2009) — The long process of appealing the ruling of Judge Jerome  B. Simandle, who dismissed the case of Kerchner et al. vs. Obama & Congress has begun.  The Federal 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, has set the due date for…

  • Apuzzo on the D.C. Code's Quo warranto provisions

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    IN REGARD TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Attorney Leo Deonofrio has been leading a crusading effort to clarify the understanding of, publicize and advocate the use of the D.C. Quo warranto provisions.  Recently he has commented at his blog, naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com, about the D.C. code and the Barnett vs. Obama case, and responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s previous…

  • Kerchner Appeals!

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    NATIONAL SECURITY DEMANDS A HEARING ON THE MERITS! by John Charlton (Oct. 27, 2009) — Attorney Mario Apuzzo, esq., announced this afternoon at 2:45 PM ET that the Plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. v. Obama & Congress et al.. have appealed their case to the 3rd Circuit Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Plaintiffs in the…

  • Department of Justice "Messed up", when they filed Notice of Simandle's Ruling

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    LEAD PLAINTIFF IN KERCHNER VS. OBAMA SAYS HIS CASE SUPPORTS PLAINTIFFS IN BARNETT VS. OBAMA by John Charlton (Oct. 27, 2009) — During the last 14 months, American citizens motivated by their desire to see the Constitution upheld as the Supreme Law of the Land, have undertaken many disparate and individual actions to demand proof…

  • Letter to the Editor — Oct. 26, 2009

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    Your dereliction of duty is contemptible, but we will prevail! by Sharon Rondeau Dear Editor, I am sending Judge Simandle this letter, today, in the mail: October 24, 2009 U.S. District Judge Jerome B. Simandle U.S. Courthouse Fourth & Cooper Streets Camden, NJ  08101 Dear Judge Simandle: RE:  KERCHNER V. OBAMA I am appalled that…

  • Simandle the Anarchist

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    EX-NAIDER RAIDER ATTACKS REASON AND JUSTICE, TO SUPPORT TYRANNY Legal analysis by John Charlton (Oct. 23, 2009)  —  Judge Jerome B. Simandle took 2 months to write his eleven page Opinion, granting the Motion to Dismiss in the case Kerchner vs. Obama.  But in the final analysis, his ruling was just that: an “opinion,” without…

  • Simandle's 4 strikes against the U.S. Constitution

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    RULING IN KERCHNER VS OBAMA, TO DIMISS CASE CRITIQUED legal analysis and critique by an anonymous patriot (Oct. 22, 2009) –  Federal Judge Jerome B. Simandle’s ruling to grant the govt.’s Motion to Dismiss, in the case Kerchner vs. Obama, is not only a clear violation of the laws of the country but also a…

  • Orly Taitz speaks with The Post & Email – Part I

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    DISCUSSES LIFE, 2008 ELECTION, CASES, & JUDICIARY by Sharon Rondeau (Oct. 22, 2009) — Here follows the transcript of The Post & Email’s interview with Dr. Orly Taitz, esq., lead counsel in the case Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Barack Hussein Obama et al., in Santa Ana Federal Court.  The Post & Email has…

  • Kerchner on Simandle's Ruling

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    LEAD PLAINTIFF DECRIES OVERTHROW OF CONSTITUTION by John Charlton (Oct. 21, 2009) — Moments ago, Commander Charles F. Kerchner, U.S. Naval Reserve (Ret.) issued the following statement — exclusive to The Post & Email — in response to Judge Jerome B. Simandle’s dismissal of his case: The monarchy/federal government has now spoken, with the complicity…

  • Simandle turns and runs: Dismisses Kerchner vs. Obama

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    BETRAYS LEGACY OF NAIDER’S RAIDERS, SIDES WITH TYRANNY & GOVT. SECRECY by John Charlton (Oct. 21, 2009) — It’s another judicial cop-out; but from a surprising quarter:  Judge Jerome B. Simandle, who began his citizen advocacy and legal career as a Naider’s raider, has sided with tyranny by granting the Motion to Dismiss, in the…

  • CDR Kerchner, "On the Sovereign and Sovereign Immunity"

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    ARGUES FOR RIGHTS OF ‘WE THE PEOPLE’ AS ONLY CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY TO NATIONAL CRISIS by John Charlton (Oct. 20, 2009) — Commander Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., U.S. Naval Reserve (Retired), issued a public statement today in favor of the sovereign rights of the citizens of the United States against governmental usurpation as the unique and…

  • The 7th Circuit Court's Argument against Quo Warranto's use

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    AND ITS APPLICABLITY TO ELIGIBILITY CASES Legal Summary & Analysis by John Charlton (Oct. 8, 2009) — Yesterday, Attorney Leo Donofrio brought again to the attention of the Nation, the existence of a case in the Federal 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, which strangely was not cited by acting Attorney General George S. Cardona, in…

  • Editorial: Oct. 6, 2009 — The Hillary Moment: Use it or Lose it

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in ,

    WHY HILARY CLINTON IS AT THE PEAK OF HER POWER and WHAT SHE CAN DO WITH IT by John Charlton I did not vote for Hillary Clinton. But this week I am a Hilary Clinton fan, in a sense. Let me explain. Hillary Clinton, the Secretary of State of the United States under Barack Hussein…

  • Simandle responds to Apuzzo

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    EX-NAIDER RAIDER CITES COMPLEXITY OF ISSUES By John Charlton (October 2, 2009) — This evening Judge Jerome B. Simandle responded to Attorney Mario Apuzzo’s Letter of Inquiry, on behalf of the Plaintiffs, in the case Kerchner et al. vs. Obama et al..  Attorney Apuzzo’s letter had inquired regarding the Judge’s delay on two motions before…

  • Apuzzo files Letter of Inquiry to Judge Simandle

    —

    by

    Sharon Rondeau
    in

    DELAY IN CASE IS REASONABLE MOTIVE TO ASK FOR ACTION by John Charlton (Oct. 1, 2009) —  Attorney Mario Apuzzo, esq., counsel for the plaintiffs in Kerchner et al. vs. Obama et al., has filed a “Letter of Inquiry” before Judge Jerome B. Simandle, inquiring as to the delay in ruling on two motions in…