If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

Welcome Back!

whereas Internet Sources confirm some of its facts

By John Charlton

(Sept. 4, 2009) — Dr. Orly Taitz has once again stunned American with the filing of an apparent birth transcript for Barack Hussein Obama II, the currently recognized U.S. President, procured by Lucas Daniel Smith, of YouTube fame.  This transcript is stunning, because if authenticated as true, it would mean that Barack Obama is definitely not a natural born citizen, regardless of the legitimacy of his parents marriage, and thus would be forced to resign the Presidency, the most powerful office in the world.

For more than 12 months Barack Obama has fought countless legal challenges to his eligibility to be president of the United States:  first from the life long Democrat and Hillary Clinton supporter, Mr. Philip Berg, former assistant Attorney General for the State of Pennsylvania, who challenged his citizenship on the basis of his birth place, and was first to bring forth evidence for a birth in Mombasa (as discussed in “Born in Mombasa?”).  Then there was notably Mr. Leo Donofrio, of New Jersey, who sued the Secretary of the State of New Jersey, on the grounds that his rights to vote for an eligible candidate were obviated by there being 3 ineligible, non “natural born citizens” on the ballot in that state.

Most recently, Dr. Orly Taitz has obtain a hearing before Judge Carter of the Southern Division District of the U.S. Federal Court in California, regarding her effort to obtain the original records of Barack Obama which would definitely prove his eligibility and history of claims regarding birth place, parentage and citizenship, being that to be eligible for the office of U.S. President, one must be born on U.S. soil, of 2 citizen parents.

For this reason the birth transcript filed by Dr. Taitz yesterday is stunning; since it lists Barack Obama Jr. as born in Mombasa of Anne Dunham and Barrack Hussein Obama Snr., thus making him born NOT on U.S. Soil, and NOT of 2 American citizen parents, and thus ineligible to be president of the United States of America.

Due to the controversial nature of this news, and on account of having corresponded with Mr. Leo Odera Omolo, previously, who claims to be a life long friend of the late father of the U.S. President, I asked Mr. Omolo for his reaction to the Lucas Document.

The birth certificate is a master forgery-work,” says Omolo; it “does not reflect what kind of hospital birth certificates, bearing the British coat of arms, that we have in 1961.  Mark you:  Kenya was at the time still a British colony, and all the important documents, like a birth certificate, used to bear the coat of arms entitled “Colony and Protectorate of Kenya.”  He further claims personal knowledge of what such certificates look like, saying:  “Personally I have three children with my own from 1959, 1969 and 1962, and their hospital-issued certificate is quite different.”

Mr. Omolo goes on to explain in his email that the attending physician could not have reasonably been thought to be present:  “Dr. James Ang’awa, whose name appears in the certificate, was by then in charge of the Tuberculosis Unit at King George V Hospital in Nairobi, and could not have gone to Mombasa specifically to issue a birth certificate in a hospital where he did not work in . . .”

He then reaffirms his knowledge of the late Barrack H. Obama Snr., and says he was not in the country in 1961:  “As far as I was an adult and the person who knew the late Barrack Obama Snr very well, the man left this country in 1959 and never set foot in Kenya until after independence.  Kenya became Independent on December 12th,1963, and Obama returned home two years later not with Ann Dunham but with Ruth, and that was the first time I saw him return.”

Mr. Omolo’s statements clearly call for further investigation of the authenticity of the document, even if they only cast doubt on the reasonableness of its authenticity. 


One fact related by Mr. Omolo is seemingly discounted by the report found in the East Africa & Rhodesia Newspaper, Vol. 37, (May 18, 1961),  p. 995, which relates that the attending physician named on the Lucas Document, Dr. James O. W. Ang’awa, was for the last 4 years on duty at the Port Reitz Chest Hospital, Mombasa, but now reassigned.  Ostensibily, therefore, it is possible that he from time to time continued to visit his former post, the popular resort town of Mombasa.

Whereas numerous documents confirm that the Coast Province  General Hospital did exist in 1961(contrary to Mr. Corsi’s reports at World Daily Net):  such as the Tropical Disease Bulletin(1962), which cites P. P. Turner’s, The Pattern of disease as seen by admissions to the Coast Province General Hospital in 1960, p. 1122, (which is also cited in B. W. Langland’s Bibliography of the Distribution of Disease in East Africa, 1965, p. 23); the Legislative Council Debates for Kenya, 1957, p. 1315; and the Report on the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya for the year 1960, p. 177.

Other sources confirm, contrary to many reports even in Kenyan Newspapers (cf. The Nation,”Anti-Obama Lunatics Living in Denial“, Aug. 5, 2009, at 19:46 local time, p. 2 of the Online edition), that Mombasa was part of the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya in 1961Report on the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya, 1960, (Colonial Office, Great Britain), p. 29, lists Mombasa among the locations of bank branches, and as the location of the Belgium Consulate to Kenya; The Statesman’s Yearbook, 1945, p. 210; The Colonial Office List of Great Britain, (Colonial Office), 1925, p. 248; The Dominions Office and Colonial Office List, 1933, p. 329 & 330, where it mentions that the Protectorate’s Supreme Court holds sessions at Mombasa.


Mr. Omolo resides in NW Kenya, west of Nairobi; Mombasa, a popular holiday spot since the 60’s, is located in S. Kenya, along the Coast, near the border with Tanzania.  The Post & Email interviewed Omolo by email at his home.

Join the Conversation

No comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. According to Article XIV, Section 1 of the Constitution:
    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States,
    citizens of the United States and of the State
    wherein they reside.”

    Even if Obama was born in Hawaii, he still would not be a citizen because his father was not a U.S. citizen. Since the father was not a citizen of the U.S., the father and his son were subject to the jurisdiction of Kenya and not the U.S.

  2. I’ve downloaded the Kenyan Certificate Birth from PACER and it matches what appears on these websites.

    All arguments go to Moot Switch if and only if Obama authorizes that his Birth Certificate (Hawaii, and not Registration of) can be released to the Public without any strikeouts. I.e., show the original document in PDF or any format that retains the original format.

    Mr. Charlton replies: Please see our comment policy at our About page. Speculation as to evidence and its authentication is good at a blog; The Post & Email is not a blog. Thanks anyhow, for your thoughts.

  3. Of all the claims of disputing the Lucas Smith document as a fraud, this one intrigues me the most.

    Although I laughed at Corsi’s blatently lame attempt to proffer a govt issued document as a comparison to a hospital issued document, this attempt of Mr Omolo’s is even worse.

    Did he offer or send you photo attachments of his children’s documents he is referring to?

    Mr. Charlton replies: No he did not; nor did I ask, because he evidently is refering to another kind of document; one which is a Birth Certificate, and issued by the government. Mr. Omolo’s statements are news in their own right; as no other voice from Kenya has spoken about the issue. The Post & Email was, to my knowledge, the only and first news source to get such a response from a Kenyan who knows the Obama family.

  4. The timing of Obama’s latest school children indoctrination speech is no coincidence. September 8, 2009 is meaningful to Obama for an entirely different reason. (See below.)

    Something of Interest, posted elsewhere on the Net:

    “Discovery hearing” re: Obama’s Kenyan BC, request for depositions of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates scheduled for September 8th, 8am.

    08/21/2009 44 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: ORDER SETTING SEPTEMBER 8, 2009 HEARING ON MOTIONS: (See document for details.) In summary, the Court sets for hearing at 8:00 a.m. on September 8, 2009, (1) the Discovery Motion, (2) the Service Notice, and (3) the Ex Parte Application. All parties are ordered to be present.

    The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action. (rla) (Entered: 08/21/2009)


    This is a Restricted Web Site for Official Court Business only. Unauthorized entry is prohibited and subject to prosecution under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. All activities and access attempts are logged

    This entry was posted on Saturday, August 22nd, 2009 at 6:05 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed”

  5. Kenyans are highly motivated to protect their great national asset by doing whatever serves Obama’s interest. Omolo is not only a Kenyan but a friend of Obama Sr., so his reliability is doubly suspect.

    And I see zero evidence that Omolo is qualified to pronounce judgment on the document as “master forgery-work.” His opinion is not without interest, but his over-reach reveals his clear intent.

  6. Since the Lucas Document is a hospital transcript, not an official government issued Birth Certificate, I do not see why it has to have the coat-of-arms of the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya, as Mr. Omolo claims…