er_giveaway_banner.jpg (39000 bytes)

Pastor Carl Gallups on Obama Eligibility: “We Will Not Give Up”

IS A MAJOR DEVELOPMENT ON THE HORIZON?

by Sharon Rondeau

If the image presented as Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery, why is he still in office?

(Jan. 14, 2013) — A new video produced by PPSimmons, whose co-founder, Carl Gallups, was interviewed by The Post & Email here and here, reports that the Maricopa County, AZ  investigation into Obama’s eligibility and citizenship is continuing (H/T ORYR).

In early December, PPSimmons had produced a video stating that a development might occur by the middle of the month. The new video states that “the particular event” did not coalesce. However, Gallups states on the video that “Plan B for the matter may turn out to be a more powerful revelation event than the first plan was…”

The Post & Email has kept in communication with Gallups since the interview about the investigation, which officially began in September 2011 after the Surprise, AZ Tea Party approached Sheriff Joe Arpaio of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) and asked that the authenticity of the birth certificate presented on the White House server in April 2011 be verified.

Arpaio has been sheriff of Maricopa County since 1993, having been re-elected to a sixth consecutive term in November.  His office is known for its tough stance with illegal immigrants in the county.

At a press conference on March 1, 2012, lead investigator Mike Zullo and Arpaio reported that there was probable cause to believe that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”  At a subsequent press conference given on July 17, 2012, Zullo and Arpaio confirmed that the birth certificate is a forgery.  Rather than launching their own investigations, reporters from major media outlets showed anger toward Arpaio and Zullo and did not televise their findings for public consumption.

Obama has affirmed in writing that the image presented to the public on April 27, 2011 is a certified copy of his original Hawaii birth certificate.  Neither Zullo nor attorneys or researchers have been able to obtain a certified copy from the Hawaii Department of Health, as “privacy” concerns have been invoked by the state agency.  A researcher who has spent the last four years studying Hawaii UIPA laws and requests told The Post & Email that Dr. Alvin Onaka, the registrar at the Health Department, has confirmed “by omission” that he cannot verify that the information on Obama’s alleged birth record is accurate.

“The matter is still huge; it is still hot, and it is still constitutionally relevant,” Gallups says in the video. “To date, there is not one piece of 100% legally verifiable evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is even a legal U.S. citizen,” he narrated.  He states that the evidence shows that Obama is not a U.S. citizen.

Gallups is the host of a Friday evening radio show, a full-time Christian pastor, writer and author of the recently-acclaimed The Magic Man in the Sky.

Obama was allegedly re-elected to a second term on November 6, 2012, amidst multiple claims of voter fraud, including vote-flipping and non-English-speaking refugees having been instructed on how to vote for Democrats “all the way down” the ballot in Ohio.

It has been reported that Zullo will give a presentation to two tea party groups on Tuesday, January 15, and possibly release an update on the investigation, which seeks the cooperation of federal authorities.

Last July, The Post & Email contacted the FBI in Washington, DC to inquire if they are investigating the claims of forgery and fraud in regard to Obama’s documentation.  At that time, the media spokesman advised us to contact our congressman if we believed a crime had been committed.

Congress has failed to launch an investigation into the allegations of fraud and forgery in regard to Obama’s documentation, having certified the electoral votes for him on January 4, 2013 without any objections.

The Post & Email communicated with Gallups just prior to the publication of this piece, and he stated that he had no “new information” at this time.

At the conclusion of the video, Gallups reminds the listener that President Richard Nixon began his second term before the evidence of his participation in the Watergate coverup was revealed and resulted in his resignation.  Gallups concludes his narration with “We will not give up.”

 

Print Friendly

Tags: , , , , ,

Categories: National

4 Responses to Pastor Carl Gallups on Obama Eligibility: “We Will Not Give Up”

  1. unbontir

    Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 1:49 PM

    Hello gigclick, Westernjournalism.com just posted an article wherein Mark Levin excoriates Obama as an “Imperial President.” I wish that you would copy and paste your comment here under that article as well.

  2. TurkeyQuill

    Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 8:46 AM

    Psalm 33:1, 13-22:

    Shout for joy in the LORD, O you righteous!
    Praise befits the upright.

    . . . The LORD looks down from heaven;
    he sees all the children of man;
    from where he sits enthroned he looks out
    on all the inhabitants of the earth,
    he who fashions the hearts of them all
    and observes their deeds.

    The king is not saved by his great army;
    a warrior is not delivered by his great strength.
    The war horse is a false hope for salvation,
    and by its great might it cannot rescue.

    Behold, the eye of the LORD is on those who fear him,
    on those who hope in his steadfast love.
    That he may deliver their soul from death
    and keep them alive in famine.

    Our soul waits for the LORD;
    he is our help and our shield.
    For our heart is glad in him,
    because we trust in his holy name.
    Let your steadfast love, O LORD, be upon us,
    even as we hope in you.

  3. gigclick

    Monday, January 14, 2013 at 9:30 PM

    Treason,perjury,election fraud,murder,identity fraud,money laundering,illegal campaign donations,stimulus money fund fraud,kickbacks,usurpation,misprision of felony,constitutional law obfuscation,illegal and personal use of taxpayer funds,forcing taxpAyers to pay over $4 million to perkins coie seattle washington dnc law firm to keep his “records” sealed from public access to defraud the nation,biden/pelosi falsified dnc papers to “vet” obama knowing it was forgery,obama’s ac/dc past with rohm emmanuel at “man’s country” men’s gay club in chicago that they have standing memberships in and were both well known in the gay community in chicago.why do they refuse to allow the public to view his official records? Why have none of the big news media outlets shown obama’s $35 million dollar retirement mansion in hawaii and where the money came from to purchase this property? See it at http://www.wnd.com/obama‘s $35 million dollar retirement mansion in hawaii. While america sleeps the biggest sham in america’s history is allowed to continue by a complicit corrupted judicial that is profiting from the corruption through back door promotions and pay raises.is it “the american dream” or the final call to citizens taking back our nation?

  4. unbontir

    Monday, January 14, 2013 at 9:01 PM

    Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the heck out of the world and rule against Obama as being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15th?

    Could Chief Justice Roberts have been defensively posturing for the blow-back, “blacklash” if you please, of a decision he may have realized would be necessary to make on Mr. Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility when he ruled so surprisingly on Obamacare?

    Might not the Chief Justice have been intentionally positioning himself and the Supreme Court as apparently not being unfavorably inclined towards Mr. Obama so as to insulate them both from certain to arise liberal charges of racism should a decision be rendered by the court on the issue of constitutional eligibility which would pronounce that Mr. Obama is not now and never has been eligible to be president?

    If, after considering the evidence submitted to the Supreme Court in multiple cases which the court has turned down, the Chief Justice found it necessary to consider various paths that the Supreme Court eventually might have to take in defense of the Constitution, could the Chief Justice have strategically planned to first rule in favor of Obamacare–as a tax–knowing that such a ruling would theatrically demonstrate an apparent support for Obama–or, at the very least, demonstrate no antagonism towards the man–while still leaving Obamacare open to state by state dismantling until such time as a ruling on Mr. Obama’s eligibility would remove the law retro-actively as having been passed while Mr. Obama was in the commission of crimes and, most importantly, act as the perfect disclaimer to angry liberal entities which would scream “Racism!” as they rallied liberal-socialist Obama supporters ‘Forward’ towards anything but “civil” disobedience were the Supreme Court to retro-actively abrogate the illegal elections of the constitutionally ineligible fraud and forger, Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack ‘King Hussein’ Obama Jr., the ‘Manchurian’ Muslim from Mombasa, a.k.a. Soebarkha, a.k.a. Harrison J. Bounel?

    Could the Chief Justice be about to shock the world and rule against Obama being constitutionally eligible to be president on February 15th?

    Will the Chief Justice permit the two Supreme Court Justices appointed by Mr. Obama, (or whatever his legal name, the name written on his original long form birth certificate–not to be confused with the electronic file released by the White House in April 2011 which has been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt to be a poorly constructed forgery), to participate in hearing the case surrounding the issue of eligibility when their conflict of interest could not be greater? Insofar as their appointments to the Supreme Court would too necessarily have to be retro-actively abrogated–effectively annulled–as they were made in the commission of the criminal usurpation of the office of the president of the United States concomitant with the military rank of commander-in-chief.

    Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency is the most horrendous crime committed against the American people and our experiment in ‘government of the People, by the People, and for the People’ in our nation’s history. All those complicit in Mr. Obama’s crimes must be brought to justice if liberty is to be preserved.

    At this point in time, the question of whether or not Mr. Obama’s criminal usurpation of the presidency shall be addressed by the proper authorities is completely in the hands of God and Chief Justice Roberts. In God we trust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>