Spread the love

by Bob Russell, ©2022

(Oct. 22, 2022) — I recently received the newsletter titled IMPRIMIS published by Hillsdale College.  I receive one every month, but this issue is much more disturbing than some others have been.  The item was written by Harmeet Dhillon, the managing  partner of the Dhillon Law Group and and is titled, “THE POLITICIIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.”  Ms. Dhillon covers the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election that millions of American citizens, including this writer, consider to have been stolen through massive VOTE FRAUD.  Those who support the results cannot refute the facts of FRAUD because so many “irregularities” that are more than clear occurred.

Liberals deny it but they KNOW FRAUD OCCURRED because it is so evident a blind person can see it.  Election procedures were clearly violated.  The Constitution clearly states that election procedures shall be determined by the legislatures of states.  In 2020 election procedures were changed by governors, judges, local election boards, and state attorneys general in violation of the Constitution.  Also, republican vote-counting observers were either removed totally (some being led out in handcuffs) or were kept so far from counting tables that they could not see what was going on and windows were covered to prevent observation. 

In other cases, vehicles sporting biden placards were caught on video arriving in the middle of the night and unloading boxes of ballots, long after all ballots were supposed to have been submitted.  In another instance, after counting had been halted for the night and count observers had been sent out, people were seen on video pulling boxes from under tables and running ballots through machines, in one instance the ballots being run through several times. 

In Pennsylvania President Trump was reported ahead by 300,000 votes when counting was suspended for the evening but behind by 400,000 votes when counting was resumed the next morning.  How did they get a 700,000 vote change when counting had stopped?  Mail-in and substantial ballot harvesting also lends credibility to the thought that the election was FRAUDULENT in favor of biden.  

In the IMPRIMIS article, Ms. Dhillon focused on two instances of illegal activity by the FBI.  The first was the yearlong secretive campaign of spying on Project Veritas.  There were 19 subpoenas, seizure orders, and warrants issued by nine different judges.  Included in the subterfuge were gag orders that ensured Project Veritas principals would not discover the DOJ’s illegal activities.  More than 200,000 private emails were given to the DOJ by Microsoft and countless text messages surrendered by other entities.  A few months later Project Veritas offices were raided and 47 electronic devices seized in what can only be described as Stasi/KGB/Gestapo tactics.  According to Ms. Dhillon The New York Times was tipped off before the raids and contacted Veritas officials for comment while the raids were still in progress.  I thought it was against the law to leak information about investigations to the media but apparently not when it is the demonic left doing both.  When a draft of the Supreme Court decision on Roe vs. Wade was leaked, the DOJ had a different opinion on the relevance of leaks, depending on who the target was (reference to the ashley biden diary leaked to Veritas earlier).

The Mar-A-Lago raid was just as, if not more, egregious.  FBI agents raided President Trump’s Florida residence based on a search warrant that was unlawfully vague and obtained through very questionable tactics.  As part of the raid, Melania Trump’s lingerie was gone through and left in quite a mess.  I wonder what kind of “classified information” agents thought they would find written on her lingerie, or were they just being voyeurs because there was no one there to stop them as the Trumps were in New York City at the time.

Then we see the police-state tactics against citizens protesting against school boards that are indoctrinating children to hate their country and each other based on skin color.  Also a problem is the indoctrination of children as young as five years old to accept pornography and homosexuality as “normal” and that gender can be changed if they want to change it.  I constantly see video clips of liberals saying that parents demanding this stop are guilty of committing violent acts and making terrorist threats when the videos of the incidents show a lot of angry shouting but no threats or violent acts.  One father in Virginia was arrested and charged with making terrorist threats when he confronted the local school board about his 14- year-old daughter being raped by a male student who “identified” as a girl and was allowed into the girls’ restroom at the high school.  The father made no threats nor violent act.  The only violence was that which the police committed against him.  The male student was transferred to another school in the district and reportedly raped another girl when he was again allowed to “identify” as a girl and use the girls’ restroom.

Now devildemocommiecrats have introduced legislation in congress to make speaking out against the “transgender” movement a federal crime punishable by many years in prison.  It looks as if free speech, or any speech that opposes liberal debauchery, will soon be a major crime.  While murderers, rapists, and arsonists are cheered by the left, patriots who want the Constitution and biblical moral norms followed are the criminals who must be locked away for the good of the demonic left in America.

Mao Tse Tung ruled China as a dictator from 1949 to 1976 and was responsible for as many as 65 million deaths

If the last two years have not shown the devildemocommiecrat party to be satanic tyrants I don’t know what will be needed to wake people up.  Right now some people cheer this on, but they won’t cheer so much when the despotism is turned on them, and it will eventually be turned on them.  Despots need enemies and once we conservatives are gone the despots will turn on their supporters, as every other one has in the past.  Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot, and various other 20th-century despots are examples of despots turning on their own supporters.  Christianity is being “deemed” a “violent and dangerous” cult while islam, whose followers not only regularly call for violence against “non-believers” but carry out their demands, are ignored by the liberal left.

Joe dementia now has more federal bureaucrats armed with automatic rifles than the Marine Corps has soldiers.  The only reason I have seen, and can imagine, is for the purpose of crushing any dissent to autocratic rule.  Why do IRS and forestry people need automatic rifles?  I doubt there are many wildlife creatures that pose a threat to the government and we conservatives have not been the ones committing violent acts against police or government buildings.  Why do they send 30 heavily armed FBI agents to arrest a man who offered to come in voluntarily to answer questions about his religious beliefs unless the goal is to intimidate others into bowing to tyranny rather than to stand up for the values this nation has stood for since its inception?  Christianity is being criminalized by the satanists who control the government, meaning physical persecution is not far away.  Those “Christians” willing to bow to liberalism are playing a dangerous game and playing for the wrong team.  Jesus Christ said we are to be IN the world but not OF the world, but some choose to be OF the world so the media and other leftists will applaud their “enlightenment” and “tolerance,” but they will pay a steep price. If not in this life, they surely will pay it in eternity.

I submit this in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, in faith, with the responsibility given to me by Almighty God to honor His work and not let it die from neglect.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Thank You, Mr Russell.

    AG Garland’s refusal enforce 18 U.S.C. 1507 to protect the homes and families of Republican members of the SCOTUS from protesters is as blatant an example of THE POLITICIIZATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE as one could cite.