Spread the love

by Sharon Rondeau

Screenshot: AFLDS newsletter announcing its second press conference to be held on Tuesday, July 27, 2021

(Jul. 23, 2021) — On Friday the organization “America’s Frontline Doctors” (AFLDS) issued an announcement in an email newsletter that it will be holding a press conference on Tuesday, the first anniversary of its “White Coat Summit” in which its physicians gathered on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court to challenge the government and medical profession’s handling of the COVID-19 “pandemic.”

On Friday afternoon, founder Dr. Simone Gold, a physician and attorney, tweeted a brief video recap of the group’s rejection by the majority of the medical community and deplatforming from YouTube and other websites, including its website hosting company, after it took the unpopular position that COVID-19 could be treated on an outpatient basis with hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin.

That position was taken early last year by Dr. Zev Zelenko, who claimed he treated numerous COVID-19 patients with success using the formula and was permanently silenced by Twitter.

“One year ago,” Gold, whose Twitter account was temporarily suspended earlier this year, wrote, “they tried to censor the truth. But we stood tall and refused to be silenced, and the truth remains alive. Get ready for a press conference that will rattle the world; America’s Frontline Doctors presents WHITE COAT SUMMIT: The One Year Anniversary”.

Organized as a non-profit, AFLDS is “a project of the Free Speech Foundation,” its website states in a footnote.

In April Gold was a guest speaker at the Health & Freedom Conference in Tulsa, OK organized by entrepreneur and radio host Clay Clark.

In November, prior to the vaccines having received EUA status, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claimed that it “must ensure that recipients of the vaccine under an EUA are informed, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances, that FDA has authorized the emergency use of the vaccine, of the known and potential benefits and risks, the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown, that they have the option to accept or refuse the vaccine, and of any available alternatives to the product. Typically, this information is communicated in a patient ‘fact sheet.’ The FDA posts these fact sheets on our website.”

The nature of the “experimental” vaccines, according to AFLDS as maintained in a number of lawsuits it filed, is detailed in a white paper which states, in part:

  1. They are not acting like vaccines, according to the common definition of a vaccine.

The investigational COVID-19 vaccines were granted emergency use based upon reducing symptoms only and not based upon preventing transmission of SARS CoV2. Once the trials are completed, Moderna October 27, 2022 and Pfizer January 31, 2023, the data will be analyzed and at that time it may be possible to know if either or both vaccine candidates reduce viral transmission. There has never been a situation where a vaccine candidate was rolled out to millions of healthy people under such a bizarre set of facts.

2.  The experimental vaccine only lessens symptoms.

The effective rates reported of 90% or above, refer to minimizing the symptoms of COVID-19, not immunizing you against the SARS CoV-2 virus. That is why the CDC is still recommending wearing the mask after you take the experimental “vaccine.” You are still at risk of getting the virus. It is similar to taking Tylenol to reduce the pain of a headache not a cure or avoiding of the headache.

On July 19, Atty. Thomas Renz announced his filing of a lawsuit in the Northern District of Alabama against the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with a motion to withdraw the vaccines from administration to children ages 12 to 17 and to those who have already recovered from the virus.

With the claim that no “emergency” exists from the virus, Renz and his co-attorney, Larry Becraft, moved the agency to comply with their motion “until such time as the Defendants have complied with their obligation to create and maintain the requisite ‘conditions of authorization’ under Section 546 of the Food, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(e), thereby enabling Vaccine candidates to give truly voluntary, informed consent.”

The FDA’s “fact sheet” for 12-17-year-olds regarding the Pfizer vaccine can be found here, with a June 25, 2021 update cautioning:

Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. You should seek medical attention right away if you have any of the following symptoms after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine: 
• Chest pain
• Shortness of breath
• Feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart.​​​​

If you have a history of myocarditis or pericarditis, tell your healthcare provider before getting the Pfizer-BioNTech ​​​​​​​COVID-19 Vaccine.

Earlier Friday The Post & Email contacted AFLDS through its online form to ask if it could divulge the topics it plans to cover on Tuesday and whether or not its members would be taking questions from reporters and the public. No response was received as of press time.

A link in the newsletter to the live streaming to be provided Tuesday is here.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.