by Sharon Rondeau
(Jun. 1, 2021) — On Tuesday morning, a “Waiver” appeared on the U.S. Supreme Court docket in the case Laity v. Harris, 20-1503, from “Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Acting Solicitor General, Counsel of Record” stating that “The Government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court.”
The filing is dated May 28, 2021, one day after the Court held a conference to decide whether or not to grant Laity’s request for a writ of certiorari.
As The Post & Email has reported, plaintiff Robert C. Laity has challenged Kamala Harris’s constitutional eligibility to serve as vice president or president of the United States. Laity sued Harris in her personal capacity and did not name “the Government” or any government functionary as a defendant.
Further, the Waiver is unsigned and does not indicate that Harris’s attorney, Beth Brinkmann of Covington & Burling, was notified of its filing.
Through Brinkmann on May 7, Harris filed a Waiver of her right to respond to the petition.
On Tuesday morning, an “Order List” list issued by the Court indicated Laity’s petition for a writ of certiorari was denied.
According to the U.S. Justice Department, Prelogar began serving as Acting Solicitor General on Joe Biden’s first day in office. “The task of the Office of the Solicitor General is to supervise and conduct government litigation in the United States Supreme Court,” the website states. “Virtually all such litigation is channeled through the Office of the Solicitor General and is actively conducted by the Office. The United States is involved in approximately two-thirds of all the cases the U.S. Supreme Court decides on the merits each year.”
According to Law.com, Prelogar was earning just over $2 million annually in her position at private law firm Cooley, LLP, “where she advised major technology and social media clients, including Twitter, Uber and Facebook, according to a financial disclosure she filed after joining the Biden administration.” In her previous position at Justice, the website and The American Law Institute state, she assisted Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Prior to beginning private practice Prelogar served as a law clerk to Judge Merrick Garland, who is now attorney general; the late U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg; and Justice Elena Kagan.
Update, 4:08 p.m. EDT: In a statement following the publication of the order, Laity wrote, “Technically, the United States was a defendant. I filed the matter as U.S., ex rel, Robert C. Laity v. Purported Vice-President Kamala Devi Harris. I was required to serve the US Attorney General, The US Attorney for DC and the US Solicitor General. For all intents and purposes, the US Government was the defendant. More to come. I don’t give up easily.”
The Soopreme Court of Jesters once again “Punts” on their Constitutional Duty.
There is No Rule of Law in the USSA.
Also sElections are by Fraudulent Coup, and the Sheeples continue to line up wear masks and get Vaxed as ordered. Tell me “Why” this isn’t the USSA.
STAMPEDES of STUPIDITY
While we can accept that folks aboard the RMS Titanic would succumb to the group contagion of “Titanic panic on the Atlantic”, it is curious how millions of muslims would pray 5 times a day, in apparent obedience to an ancient mind slavery, to a head-harvesting illiterate pedophile, Muhammed, and, also, how millions of minions here in USA would succumb to the group stupor and stupidity of “America’s first black President”-FRAUD.
Compare these UNIVERSAL OBSERVATIONS OF REALITY:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JLfqqfNU4o >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CGat7kcbnI >>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKJIJLFX0qw
For those capable of stepping away from today’s many stampedes of stupidity, now, quietly and objectively note these three other UNIVERSAL OBSERVATIONS OF REALITY, which may obviously be rejected by some as being, “not real”:
1. Many folks will refuse to accept Obama II as an EVIDENCE-OF-FRAUD-presIDent 08-28-08- TODAY until they might fully remodel their frames of mind from a “believing-is-seeing” subjective reality to a “seeing-is-believing” objective reality. Henry Wilson take note herein, AND PERHAPS BEGIN TO ACCEPT, NOT WILLFULLY REJECT, THE STUBBORN EVIDENCES OF PLAIN OBSERVATIONS OF REALITY.
2. The “President Obama” HOAX-HYSTERIA 08-28-08- TODAY is sustained, in part, by those who actively confuse the public mind with the stupidity of “parental citizenship of Presidents does not matter”. For example, some “scholars of stupidity (with their PhD in Stupidity)” demand that the parental citizenships of Obama II does not matter, even if his briefly visiting “Father From My Dreams”, Obama I, remained a sole British subject/citizen of Kenya his whole life, YET, THE ALLEGED U.S. CITIZENSHIP OF CRUZ’S MOTHER IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO, SOMEHOW, MAKE CANADA CRUZ A LEGAL “natural born [U.S.] Citizen”-President! Really?
3. Another UNIVERSAL OBSERVATION OF REALITY is the rarity of all 50 states ever being in 100% agreement on any controversial issue (i.e., civil unions allowed in some states but not in all, or recreational marijuana consumption allowed in some states but illegal in others, or sanctuary safe-harbors for criminal aliens promoted in some states but illegal in others, et al), YET, 100% of AMERICA’S ENTIRE NATION-WIDE JUDICIAL NETWORK REFUSES TO ACCEPT, AND ALWAYS 100% REJECTS, ANY JUDICIAL REVIEW OF OBAMA and KAMALA CHALLENGES TO THEIR “natural born Citizen” PRESIDENTIAL INELIGIBILITIES! 100% NATION-WIDE JUDICIAL REJECTION 08-28-08- TODAY! How is that really possible; nationally-syndicated “re-lying on lying”…OR ELSE?
Nonetheless, we can all step away from today’s on-rushing stampedes of stupidity and IDIOTOLOGY (= BLM, critical race theory, etc.) whenever we just calmly submit to, and accept, pure OBSERVATIONS OF REALITY from our own natural unmolested universal common senses of SIGHT-SOUND-SMELL-TASTE-TOUCH.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stupidity
Since in “U.S., ex rel, Robert C. Laity”, ex rel means “in relation to”, doesn’t that mean that the Government was the Plaintiff since Laity was suing on behalf of the Government? Does he mean the Government was a Respondent?
Luke, in Quo Warranto cases, the U.S. Attorney General, on the information of a “Relator” is the Plaintiff and the Relator (Me) is a quasi-plaintiff. The U.S. Attorney General declined my request for him to present the matter in the District Court. I proceeded as the Plaintiff, in behalf of the U.S. Government. Kamala Harris, a U.S. Senator at the time I filed and now the purported Vice-President is a U.S. government respondent. I hope that clarifies things for you.
Not really.
“Technically, the United States was a defendant” and “I proceeded as the Plaintiff, in behalf of the U.S. Government” are contradictory: the federal government could not have been both the plaintiff and defendant at the same time. And a plaintiff cannot proceed on behalf of a defendant.
The defendant in this case was Harris, and at all times was represented by a private firm. And not the federal government.
In the U.S. Supreme Court, the federal government would have been a respondent, but it waived its response to the cert. petition.
Technically, the United States was a defendant. I filed the matter as U.S., ex rel, Robert C. Laity v. Purported Vice-President Kamala Devi Harris. I was required to serve the US Attorney General, The US Attorney for DC and the US Solicitor General. For all intents and purposes, the US Government was the defendant. More to come. I don’t give up easily.
What happened to the three justices who wanted to hear this case?
I told you in an earlier comment that I needed FOUR.
And you also said that three justices were open to hearing the case.
https://www.thepostemail.com/2021/04/25/exclusive-laity-provides-supreme-court-filing-challenging-harriss-eligibility/
There is no indication that any justice wanted to hear this case. And you never explained who these justices were, or what information led you to this belief.
Why did the Supreme Court deign this petition ? Once again this court has failed to clearly define the term “Natural-Born Citizen”.
Because the lower courts ruled Laity lacked standing, and there was nothing unusual about those rulings.
Laity has standing. It’s the simply judicial corruption on display. Courts don’t want to hear the case…so they won’t. Not because they are legally precluded from doing so. Same applies to court’s unwillingness to get to the bottom of the obvious election fraud that has resulted in a soft Marxist coup of our country.
Every court that heard Laity’s suit, including the U.S. Supreme Court, disagrees.
Henry,
True or False:
1. Soetoro-Obama II’s birth certificate is a forgery
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BMOw8tqooc
2. Nancy Pelosi signed a document for the DNC on 08-28-08 nominating Soetoro-Obama II to be a known Constitutionally-ineligible presidential candidate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3zR0&feature=youtu.be
3. All previous U.S. generations 1789- 08-28-08 interpreted “natural born Citizen”, via living examples, to mean: born in U.S. to sole-U.S.-allegiance-citizen-parents, as the following UNIVERSAL OBSERVATIONS OF REALITY indicate:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_presidents_of_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_vice_presidents_of_the_United_States
What say you?
1. There is no evidence that Obama’s birth certificate was forged.
2. There’s no evidence that Pelosi believed Obama was ineligible.
3. There’s no evidence that prior generations interpreted “natural born citizen” as you do.
None of which is relevant to the courts’ dismissing Laity’s suit for lack of standing.
https://vivabarneslaw.locals.com/upost/724293/robertbarnes-certiorari-denied-laity-v-harris-https-www-supremecourt-gov-orders-courtorders