by Leo Donofrio, naturalborncitizen, ©2021

(Jan. 12, 2021) — I can confirm that Rudy Giuliani has been reading the research published on this page. I am not aware of any decision yet, but the MAGA nation must get up to speed now. Don’t be distracted. Quo Warranto is where your attention needs to be. Ignore all the fake shiny objects. President Trump has a clear judicial path to four more years, the next four years, not 2024.

Below are the major precedents and links to the statute and prior research. Please get this information out everywhere. Fear of President Trump filing a quo warranto action in the D.C. District Court is driving the new impeachment and 25th Amendment fallacies.

These are are pure bluffs being used as bargaining chips to get President Trump off focus on quo warranto. The impeachment procedure requires 17 Republican Senators to comply. And there are not 17 Republican Senators willing to permanently destroy their political careers for Biden & Pelosi. She needs 2/3rds of the Senate to convict an impeachment. Without a conviction, impeachment is nothing more than a failed indictment ending with an acquittal. Does Pelosi really intend to see President Trump acquitted again? No. This is bluff #1. Ignore it.

So what about the 25th Amendment? That’s even more delusional, as ultimately Pelosi will need 2/3rds of both the House and the Senate to make it stick. This is bluff #2.

Read the entire 25th Amendment, and then it will be clear that even if Pelosi could get Pence and a majority of executive branch officers to commit to a coup, she still needs 2/3 of the House and Senate to override Trump’s essential veto which is written in the actual text of the 25th Amendment at Section 4, clause 2, which states:

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.(Emphasis added.)

Ok, so even if Pelosi initially pulls it off under Section 4, clause 1, the 25th Amendment at Section 4, clause 2 says, “Thereafter”, meaning immediately thereafter, even one second thereafter, the President can transmit a written declaration that no disability exists. And then Pelosi will need 2/3rds of both the House and the Senate to override the President’s transmission. And that ain’t gonna happen, people.

They are bluffing, and President Trump must immediately call their bluffs by filing an action for quo warranto in the D.C. District Court to oust Biden from the office of President. Below are the two main judicial precedents which verify President Trump can, in fact, bring an action there for a jury trial to oust Biden from office based on either fraud or even just plain error.

And don’t think a skilled trial attorney can’t find a fair jury in D.C. Voir Dire is a science, and with social media it’s now a very exact science. By far, a jury trial to determine the legality of the election is our best bet. There’s a very good reason why most civil cases settle rather than go to a jury. It’s called uncertainty.

And all of the evidence gathered in all of the states will be entered, with sworn affidavits, in the verified complaint that initiates the action. Furthermore, the D.C. District Court will be required to take Judicial Notice of the decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court that officials there invited illegal voting by encouraging voters to violate the law claiming indefinitely confined status.

“In 1902 Congress adopted a District Code, containing a Chapter on quo warranto which though modeled after the English statute differed therefrom in several material particulars. The writ was treated as a civil remedy; it was not limited to proceedings against municipal officers, but to all persons who in the District exercised any office, civil or military.” Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537, 544 (1915).

Note that the United States Supreme Court’s opinion here itself put these words in italics; all; and any office, civil or military.

And the 9th Circuit affirmed that the federal quo warranto statute is the proper means by which a Presidential election can be challenged after the suspect POTUS is sworn in:

“Plaintiffs concede that the District Court for the District of Columbia is the proper venue to issue a writ of quo warranto under D.C.Code § 16-3503…The District Court properly dismissed Plaintiff’s quo warranto claims under D.C.Code § 16-3503, because the proper venue to file such claims against the President of the United States would be the District of Columbia.  See D.C.Code § 16-3501.” Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774, 784 (2011).

Review the federal quo warranto statute here.

Prior research reports are here and here.

The law provides an answer. If President Trump refuses to initiate quo warranto, then he can never claim to have given our law and Judiciary a chance to make things right. This is the exact law enacted for this moment. And SCOTUS knows this. Perhaps it’s why they haven’t dismissed any of the election law suits still pending for mootness.

And perhaps this is why SCOTUS denied all motions to expedite yesterday. While expedition was denied, it’s important to note that SCOTUS did not dismiss the actions brought by President Trump, Lin Wood or Sidney Powell as being moot. Why didn’t SCOTUS dismiss all of the election cases as being moot? It’s a fair question. The answer must be that determinations in those cases can be used as evidence in a quo warranto action.

The pending election actions at SCOTUS do not require expedition at this time, because quo warranto can be used to oust a usurper only after they take office. This is also why these cases aren’t moot. Perhaps we will all owe SCOTUS an apology when this done. I would love to be wrong. I will get down on my knees and beg forgiveness if it plays out like this.

Let’s give the law a chance to work, America. Our nation is based on one legal document, the Constitution. It may yet save us.


Looking for all of your news in one place?  Try Whatfinger, your one-stop aggregator of news, opinion and everything else.

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. It has been my opinion that the failure of both state and federal courts to hear evidence, etc.–and especially the failure of the Supreme Court to hear the Texas case–is the immediate cause of desperation for those who perceive fraud. They now believe that those who commit quite flarant election fraud are beyond the reach of any legal consequences, and thus there is no hope for an untainted election in the future. This legal remedy might, even if it does not give the hoped-for results for those who initiate it, actually save the Republic. Maybe…

  2. As you have stated, it’s time to make a move. Nancy Pelosi is chopping at the bit to get her turn at being President. If Joe and Kamala are weak in their seats, then Nancy is awaiting.

  3. 1-20-21 -Today’s staged act is NOT the final chapter. The good guys win. The children will be safe in America!!! Do not walk out till the final curtain. This has not played to the end. Not burying our hope!!! Christians… stay on your knees. Fight the spiritual warfare. God has not given up. DO NOT GIVE UP ON GOD!!!

  4. 30 days ago yesterday I did a que warranto on the Charlotte County Florid Clerk of Court. He did not reply within the 30 days given. I now go into giving a notice of lien on all his property. You can confirm and review the Affidavit Statement of Que Warranto by going to the public records at, charlotteclerk.com and do a records search using my name, House Robert. Attorneys are not smart for they work for the DeFacto Corporations not the people and they will never answer a form of affidavit with the truth otherwise they would be going against their own code.

  5. Once the horse is out of the barn, it doesn’t help to shut the door. Quo Warranto or no Quo Warranto, I can’t believe the “powers” will ever abide.

  6. Email to The White House today:

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

    GOD BLESS DONALD JOHN TRUMP, “MR. AMERICA”

    Thank you, Mr. President, for all you and Melania and your family sacrificed 2015- 2021!

    From Truman to Trump, you were my greatest President!

    You and your family worked tirelessly to push back communism and Theft Left treachery, all the while, the DC Establishment worked relentlessly to remove you under any pretense.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/

    You educated some 75 million supporters on just who the “Democommunists” really are: a grand assembly of self-serving Benedict Arnolds!

    You should receive the Nobel Peace Prize and other high accolades for your applied skills in making America self-reliant, yet the Democommunists now work to remove your Administration from all human thought.

    https://www.scribd.com/document/490158946/Fact-Report-Regarding-2020-Selections-TNALC >>>

    “As of 4:00AM January 7, 2021, the United States Federal Government in its entirety, has no lawful authority over the states and the people they offended by their actions, effective January 20, 2021”

    Incapacitated China Joe and foreign citizen Jamaica Harris are not Constitutionally eligible to occupy the White House, YET OUR SELF-SERVING US GOVERNMENT-CITIZENRY IS FULLY COMPLICIT WITH THIS NATIONAL LAWLESSNESS!

    Thank God you did serve four years instead of Hillary, and in those four years, many Americans were elevated in prosperity and educated properly in just who the Democommunists (Pelosi, Schumer, Obama II+Biden II+Kamala, Too) really are = a curse, not a cure, for USA’s future on the world stage!

    Thank God, Mr. President, you installed the Wall of Sovereignty along our faithfully neglected southern border which no other president from Truman on had the courage to attempt!

    And now it is up to We the People on Main Street USA to RESIST the Democommunists (i.e., when they come for our guns, give them lead instead!) with you, Mr. President, as our coach!

    GOD BLESS TRUMP’S AMERICA

    1. The same Supreme Court Justice who was once considered to be a conservative swore-in the ineligible, identity fraud con-artist Barack Hussein Obama…twice in 2009 and once in 2013. Could it be Roberts became especially concerned about being revealed as part of The Obama Fraud when the “birther” Donald Trump was elected, and he became even more protective of covering for the HUGE crime of effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy? Hillary was promised and considered a sure thing to be the much needed after Obama cover……….but the planned voter fraud to put her in office was not enough………

      1. Listening to Steve Pzieniak says Roberts to be arrested. Sorry for the poor spelling..this is a guest appearance on Alex Jones show which I he, himself, I do not trust…but Steve is different.

  7. I was not aware SCOTUS gave a decision as to why they decided not to hear the cases. Last I heard, there was no explanation other than to NOT hear any of the cases stated above. Is this correct?

    1. Think of it like a mother arguing with her child.

      The litigants were said to have no “standing”.
      The court decided that no one will challenge their decisions.

      In other words the court said “because I’m the Mommy and I say so”

  8. “Why didn’t SCOTUS dismiss all of the election cases as being moot? It’s a fair question.”

    They denied the motion to expedite. The petition for writ wasn’t taken up yet but when it is it will be denied.