If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
TERMS PARENTS IN U.S. ON STUDENT VISAS “IMMIGRANTS”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Oct. 19, 2020) — Former Marine and Pennsylvania citizen Jeffrey Harrison reported Saturday that he received a response from one of his U.S. senators, Pat Toomey, regarding Harrison’s concern that California senator and Democratic vice-presidential candidate Kamala Harris does not qualify for the position she seeks on November 3.
Harris was born on October 20, 1964 in Oakland, CA to parents in the United States on respective student visas, raising the question in some observers’ minds that her parents were not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States when their elder daughter was born. That, in turn, could call into doubt not only Harris’s claim to be a “natural born Citizen,” as is required for the president and vice president, but also whether or not she is a legal U.S. citizen in accordance with the 14th Amendment “as originally understood,” wrote Chapman University Professor of Law John Eastman at Newsweek in August.
The amendment, ratified in 1868, does not address presidential eligibility or the meaning of “natural born Citizen.”
Prior to serving in the U.S. Senate beginning in January 2017, Harris served as Alameda County, CA deputy district attorney; the elected San Francisco district attorney, and California attorney general from 2011 through 2016.
Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen,” about which much controversy has arisen over the last 12+ years surrounding the candidacies of Barack Hussein Obama, the late John McCain, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI), Andrew Yang, and others dating back through the 20th century to include George Romney, Lowell P. Weicker, and in 1916, Charles Evans Hughes.
The 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, requires that the vice president possess all the qualifications of the president.
In his letter to Harrison, Toomey acknowledged the “natural born Citizen” and 12th-Amendment requirements. “Senator Harris was born in the United States to immigrant parents,” Toomey wrote. “Accordingly, I do not believe there are any questions regarding Senator Harris’s eligibility to serve as vice president.”
In an email to this writer on Saturday, Harrison termed Toomey’s response “lame.” “I had had contact and interaction with Toomey and his staff in person a number of times,” he wrote. “His response/reply none, his stance, and lack of action of Obama’s usurpation was criminal. He was provided proof by me and took no action.”
Indeed, during Obama’s time in the White House, Harrison participated in a number of initiatives encompassing creating flyers, educating the public, and meeting with members of Congress to discuss the questions arising over Obama’s eligibility to serve as president. In 2014, Harrison provided Toomey with a “Sheriff’s Kit” produced by the organization WheresObamasBirthCertificate (WOBC) with information and video footage released by the office of then-Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, which had authorized a criminal investigation into the “long-form” birth certificate image posted at whitehouse.gov on April 27, 2011.
Launched in August that year, in March 2012, Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse” announced having discovered probable cause to believe the image to be fraudulent, along with the purported Selective Service registration form bearing Obama’s name released to FOIA requesters by the Selective Service System in several different versions.
Later press conferences declared the long-form image a forgery beyond reasonable doubt, having been reinforced by analyses conducted by two independent forensic experts in different parts of the world, unbeknownst to each other.
On April 2, 2014, The Post & Email reported in an article titled, “PA Senator Relies on Forgery and a Senate Resolution to Convince Constituent Obama is Qualified”:
Last November, a group of volunteers traveled to Washington, DC to distribute “Sheriff’s Kits” produced by WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com to members of Congress about the findings of fraud and forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form…
Jeff Harrison was one of the volunteers who went to Washington in the fall to distribute the Sheriff’s Kits, which contain a full-length presentation by Zullo of how the team arrived at its conclusion that Obama’s documentation consists of “computer-generated forgeries.” Since that time, Harrison and others, including WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com founder Mike Volin, have followed up with those in Congress who received the kits to inquire as to their apparent lack of action on what could be the largest political conspiracy and cover-up in U.S. history.
Harrison made certain that Toomey was one of those who received a Sheriff’s Kit, having told The Post & Email, “with delivering 3 kits, Toomey did not acknowledge that he received an Affidavit nor that he even looked at it? He received one Affidavit by hand and in person. The other two Affidavits were given to his staff members and I have a witness to each of those deliveries that they were delivered.”
…On March 18, Toomey finally provided a response to Harrison on his receipt of the Sheriff’s Kit and affidavit. Although Toomey’s letter reiterates some of the standard responses issued by many members of Congress to their constituents who have questioned Obama’s constitutional eligibility over the last five years, it contains the false statement that “the Hawaii Secretary of State has confirmed that President Obama’s birth certificate is genuine…,” while in reality, the Hawaii Secretary of State has never spoken on the authenticity of any of Obama’s proffered “documentation.”
In his email Saturday, Harrison speculated that members of Congress could “face possible criminal charges” for “their lack of action and failure to uphold the Constitution and serve its citizens,” particularly if Donald Trump is re-elected next month.