Court Filing Implicates Obama in Flynn Investigation

FLYNN ATTORNEY CLAIMS FORMER “PRESIDENT” WANTED “THE RIGHT PEOPLE” TO PROBE NATIONAL-SECURITY ADVISER APPOINTEE

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 24, 2020) — A document released after a three-judge panel ordered the federal judge overseeing the case against Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn (Ret) to dismiss the charge against him states that “former President Obama,” who was in the Oval Office during the time in question, urged that “the right people” be utilized to investigate Flynn’s actions during the presidential transition.

Twitter user and attorney “TechnoFog” tweeted links to the court filing authored by Flynn’s attorneys after the 2-1 appellate decision was announced late Wednesday morning, along with several other close observers of the case.

Documents declassified last month by then-Acting Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Ric Grenell showed that Flynn’s name was “unmasked” dozens of times by Obama-regime intelligence officials during the transition period.  The substance of some of Flynn’s calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were leaked to The Washington Post and publicized, creating the appearance that Flynn lied to then-Vice-President-Elect Mike Pence about his calls with Kislyak.

On December 1, 2017, Flynn entered a “guilty” plea of lying to the FBI which he later reaffirmed in U.S. District Court in front of Judge Emmet Sullivan, the judge who recently sought to investigate the Justice Department’s request to drop Flynn’s prosecution following Justice’s own investigation into Flynn’s prosecution which found evidence against him lacking.

Although Flynn and the prosecution agreed on the dismissal, Sullivan sought outside amicus curiae and appointed a retired federal judge, John Gleeson, to take an opposition position to Justice’s, setting a July 16 hearing date to evaluate the arguments.  According to the Associated Press, that hearing will not take place given the appellate panel’s opinion.

Previously reported is that former FBI Counterintelligence Deputy Assistant Director Peter Strzok insisted on January 4, 2017 that a probe of Flynn concerning his alleged connections to Russia continue despite line agents’ recommendation that it be closed.  Twenty days later, Strzok and fellow FBI agent Joseph Pientka conducted an ad hoc meeting with Flynn in the West Wing without following the customary protocol of arranging the meeting through the White House Counsel’s office.

Referring to additional unreleased notes reported on Tuesday as “highly exculpatory” to Flynn, Flynn’s lead attorney, Sidney Powell, wrote to the court on Wednesday:

Strzok’s notes believed to be of January 4, 2017, reveal that former President Obama, James Comey, Sally Yates, Joe Biden, and apparently Susan Rice discussed the transcripts of Flynn’s calls and how to proceed against him. Mr. Obama himself directed that “the right people” investigate General Flynn. This caused former FBI Director Comey to acknowledge the obvious: General Flynn’s phone calls with Ambassador Kislyak “appear legit.” According to Strzok’s notes, it appears that Vice President Biden personally raised the idea of the Logan Act.That became an admitted pretext to investigate General Flynn. The notes are attached as Exhibit 1.

The additional notes say that Flynn’s calls with Kislyak “appear legit.”  Ultimately, Flynn was not prosecuted under the Logan Act, a 1799 law which has never successfully procured a conviction.

On Tuesday, Trump accused Obama of “treason,” which the mainstream media said was “without evidence.”

In early 2012, an image said to represent Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate posted on the White House website was reported to be a forgery beyond any reasonable doubt, along with his Selective Service registration form.  The media has failed to report the “evidence” gleaned over the five-year investigation conducted by former detective and former private investigator Mike Zullo, working under the authority of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO).

 

 

 

4 Responses to "Court Filing Implicates Obama in Flynn Investigation"

  1. Nikita's_UN_Shoe   Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 6:09 PM

    Elmo: All persons born outside of the “50” states/Washington DC to one or even two US citizen parents are STATUTORY US citizens – not natural born Citizens – , whether born in a condor’s nest atop the aircraft control tower on a military base in a foreign nation where US military personnel reside or off-base in a foreign land, including all US possessions. Example: American Samoa, Guam, and Puerto Rico.

    You mentioned “hood-winking”. It certainly did happen when the entire 110th Congressional gaggle of 100 US Senators colluded to muster-in two ineligible candidates (Obama and McCain) for the 2008 presidential election by passing the Senate Resolution 511 that declared US Senator John S. McCain, III was a natural born Citizen based on a sentence found in the repealed Naturalization Act of 1790. In fact a third party candidate for the 2008 presidential election was not a natural born Citizen either.

  2. ELmo   Tuesday, June 30, 2020 at 3:18 PM

    IMO – Republicans and the national media were equally complicit in Obama’s alleged “usurpation”.. There was no official objection in the Electoral College (where a challenge could have been made). I believe that there is evidence that a Democrat/Republican “deal” was made since there is an argument to be made that McCain was also ineligible (Born in Colon – Outside the Canal Zone – not Born on the American Base). The resulting rugg-a-bugga would have caused a big ruckus at the last minute in the election; so a deal was struck and they agreed disregard the Constitution and let the scraps of it fall where they may – and as Obama would later remark “We won, you lost and elections have Consequences”. We have been (and still are) suffering those consequences today. To think it all could have been avoided if the Press had done it’s duty and reported the evidence amassed by Arpaio/Zullo; and the Judiciary system had the guts to decide the question on it’s merits instead of copping out on their “standing” argument (which is inconsistent with a “We the People” reading of the Constitution).

    “We the People” have allowed this debacle to progress to the point where the 2020 election will determine whether or not we will loose the country and our cherished freedoms forever. In a sense WE are ALL responsible!! (I am not indicting those who have worked tirelessly to expose the truth) but the larger portion of the Electorate have chosen to “Drink the Kool ade” – Thusly, WE (as a country) have allowed ourselves to be hoodwinked by not execising proper vigilance. Our country may not recover and our children and grandchildren may heretofore pay the price.
    We have already (as readers of this site have no doubt noticed) made a sizable down payment on our loss of those freedoms.

    ELmo.

  3. Earl Shay   Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 12:01 PM

    ‘AMEN’ to every single word in your comment Mr.Arnold.
    I have known that BHO was ineligible to be president of our great United States since day one and I know I’m far from alone.
    I feel as though I’ve had a whole decade of my life taken away from me, living under the rule of a foreigner who hated our country and worked against us at every level. I want the usurper exposed to the world for the fraud that he is!

  4. thomas arnold   Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 5:49 PM

    “Obama” is not above the law! At least, I don’t think so. However, some like William Barr and Rush Limbaugh have espoused that former presidents are in a sense immune from the law and should never be subject to arrest or prosecution. Only problem is that “Obama” was never a REAL constitutionally eligible president in the first place. He STOLE the presidency. He was not, and is not, a natural born American citizen (Art 2, Sec 1, Cl 5). And, just for the record, “Obama” is not truly black. Ethnically, he is much more Arab American than African American. Do you suppose that this fact, if it became widely known, could ameliorate or even nullify the support for “Obama” by those he has deceived regarding his ancestry (and birth)?
    Now that it appears the sick treasonous truth is beginning to be revealed about “Obama,” the question arises what are we as a society prepared to do about it? Mind you, we are talking about treason here and a multitude of other high crimes and misdemeanors. Should “Obama” be arrested? Prosecuted? Imprisoned for life if not worse. Required to stand before the world and beg for mercy via a mea culpa? Pay reparations for the eight years that he was unlawfully in office and reigned over us? Be removed from our country (physically if necessary) and never allowed to come back or have any dealings with the United States of America again?
    I will tell you, SOMETHING MUST BE DONE to address, in open view of the public, “Obama’s” transgressions and crimes. While we are at it (assuming we do anything about it), we need to consider similar actions against Nancy Pelosi, others on the left who have broken their oaths to represent we, the people, and defend our constitution, the CIA for its part in unlawfully choosing, grooming, and seeing to it in many different ways (among them forgery of a phony Hawaiian birth certificate) that their Manchurian Candidate, “Obama,” was elected, and other potentially guilty parties possibly even including those in the complicit news media.
    THE TIME HAS COME TO REVEAL THE TRUTH. TO CORRECT AND REMOVE THE LIES FROM OUR COUNTRY’S HISTORICAL RECORD DURING THE “OBAMA” YEARS. TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE LAWBREAKERS REGARDLESS OF WHO THEY ARE OR THEIR IMPORTANCE. AND, STOP THE RIOTING AND VIOLENCE. LAWFUL PROTESTING IS PERMITTED. BUT, IT IS NOT THE SAME THING AS THE ANARCHY IN THE STREETS WHICH WE ARE EXPERIENCING TODAY. AND, FOR GOD’S SAKE, CEASE THE SENSELESS DESTRUCTION OF INANIMATE BUT HISTORICALLY RELEVANT STATUES, MONUMENTS, AND EVEN MUNICIPAL AND FEDERAL BUILDINGS AND CHURCHES!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.