House Committee Chairmen Push DOJ to Appoint Second Special Counsel

CITING “DECISIONS MADE AND NOT MADE”

by Sharon Rondeau

(Mar. 6, 2018) — Two U.S. House committee chairmen have sent a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein requesting that a Special Counsel be appointed to investigate allegations of corruption within the U.S. Justice Department and one of its subsidiaries, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

The complete letter can be read here:  https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Goodlatte-Gowdy-special-counsel-letter.pdf

Judiciary Committee Chairman Robert Goodlatte and Oversight & Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, both Republicans who are not seeking re-election in November, wrote that because of conflicts of interest within the agencies in regard to the investigation they believe should take place, “an independent Special Counsel is warranted.”

A number of Republican congressmen have previously called for a second Special Counsel, particularly in light of a four-page memo released by Republican members of the House Permanent Subcommittee on Intelligence (HPSCI) chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes.

The March 6, 2018 letter to Sessions and Rosenstein refers to revelations contained in the “Nunes memo,” which contended that four surveillance warrants were requested of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) by means of an unverified “dossier” appearing to implicate Donald Trump in salacious activity while in Russia and possible “collusion” with the Kremlin during the 2016 presidential campaign and perhaps afterward.

A Democrat-authored “counter-memo” released on February 24 refutes the claim that the dossier was heavily relied upon when presented to the FISC as evidence to support requests for ongoing surveillance of Carter Page, a short-time foreign-policy adviser to the Trump campaign in 2016.

Surveillance of Page began in October 2016, with subsequent requests from the DOJ and FBI approved by the FISC judges and extended through June of last year.

Both the Senate and House Judiciary Committees have conducted investigations into whether or not anyone in the Trump campaign improperly coordinated with Russian operatives to sway the election and have thus far found no evidence to support the theory.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who was brought in last May by Rosenstein to lead a dual-pronged investigation of reported Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump “collusion” claims, has obtained grand-jury indictments against former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and an associate, Rick Gates, unrelated to the Trump campaign.

On February 16, Rosenstein held a press conference in which he announced that 13 Russian nationals and three Russian-organized groups were indicted by a grand jury for their alleged role in interfering with the election.  It is unclear as to whether or not the Russians will be extradited to the U.S. for prosecution.

Trump’s first national security adviser, Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn (Ret), pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI in December, although in February Mueller requested that his sentencing be delayed.  A new presiding judge in the case, G. Emmett Sullivan, has also requested all exculpatory material despite Flynn’s having already accepted a plea deal.

Some believe that more indictments of former or current Trump aides are forthcoming, while Trump has roundly criticized the probe of his campaign as a “witch hunt.”

The DOJ’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, has been investigating allegations of political influence, bias and misconduct within the FBI since January of last year and is expected to issue his final report this month, according to independent reporter Sara Carter.  Carter is a regular contributor to the “Hannity” show, where potential wrongdoing within the FBI by former Acting Director Andrew McCabe, former Deputy of Counterintelligence Peter Strzok, and FBI staff attorney Lisa Page have been discussed in depth.

On Tuesday Carter published a list of pros and cons, according to DOJ employees and members of Congress, of appointing a second special counsel for the reasons outlined in the Gowdy/Goodlatte letter.

Carter has also been in contact with an informant who has reportedly been interviewed behind closed doors by three congressional committees about the “Uranium One” agreement in which the Obama regime sold 20% of U.S. uranium supplies to a company owned by Russia.

Goodlatte and Gowdy maintain that “decisions made and not made” by both former and current Department of Justice and FBI officials have led to the need for a special counsel.  “There is evidence of bias, trending toward animus, among those charged with investigating serious cases.  There is evidence political opposition research was used in court filings,” they wrote in the letter in a clear reference to the “dossier” compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele.

Last month, a January 4, 2018 memo from the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Charles Grassley was made public, with some redactions, and recommended that a criminal investigation take place into Steele’s contradictory statements made in a civil proceeding filed against him in a British court and to the FBI as to whether or not he leaked information from the dossier to the media.

While the two chairmen indicated confidence in Horowitz’s work on Tuesday, they wrote that he “does not have the authority to investigate other governmental entities or former employees of the Department, the Bureau, or other agencies.”

They concluded by terming their request to Sessions and Rosenstein as “important.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

3 Responses to "House Committee Chairmen Push DOJ to Appoint Second Special Counsel"

  1. ELmo   Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 11:58 AM

    Jonathan,

    Your reduction ot the situation to a mathematical equation is brilliant!! I hope you don’t mind if I borrow it (with attribution of course).
    As far as the request for the second Special Counsel goes; I am willing to wager that Sessions and Rosenstein will “opt” (read that “Stall”) to wait for Horowitz’ report before deciding that issue -In the meantime they will try everything they can to avoid/postpone/stall and downright going down that road (because that road leads OUT of the Swamp and those creatures need “Swamp Muck” to survive).

    Bob68,
    I agree with your point re: “Crime too big to prosecute” – Sessions and Rosenstein are both “Swampers” – to pervert the old hymn “Oh the wagons will be circled once again Lord by and by”.
    ELmo

  2. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:30 AM

    Thank you, Sharon, for KEEPING THE LIGHTS ON everyday via the P&E.

    I browse the P&E everyday over any other news source because it contains a tidy 9-year archive of historical diary of events of an America under siege from the Pelosi-Soros’ Soetoros (Little BO Peep and BIG MIKE)…while We the Sheeple go about their daily lives on the treadmills of commerce (and contraband), mostly content to live on a drive-by diet of sound bites and sanctuary PC(DC + DNC) = BS.

    Your P&E is a glaring beacon of light around the world of America’s “Watergate x 1,000” via the Soros’ Soetoros invasion 08-28-08- TODAY, and it is assisted with daily salvos from the Trump canons heard ’round the world via Trump’s MAGA “fireside tweets”, that replace the former FDR’s Great Depression “fireside chats”.
    http://www.americanresistanceparty.org/2018/03-18/manipulation.pdf
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fireside_chats

  3. Bob68   Tuesday, March 6, 2018 at 10:45 PM

    If Jeff Sessions appoints a second Special Council it will be, like Sessions and Mueller, another protector of the deep state……and yes, to repeat myself still again, a protector to prevent Obama’s usurpation from being fully revealed and acted on. The, “crime too big to prosecute”, remains off limits because giving America’s government and her military to the enemy is a HUGE crime and the complicit are in the hundreds, if not thousands….so, nothing happens and this, it is hoped, just goes away.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.