by Sharon Rondeau

(Jan. 30, 2018) — On Friday evening, radio host Carl Gallups and Obama birth certificate investigator Mike Zullo were guests for the second and third hours of The Hagmann Report to speak about the 5+-year investigation which found in its early stage that the “long-form” birth certificate image posted on the White House website in 2011 is a “computer-generated forgery.”

The image bears the name “Barack Hussein Obama II” and is said to be a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s original birth certificate from the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH).  The image indicates that Obama was born on August 4, 1961 at what was then called the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecologial Hospital.

Just before the two-hour mark in Friday’s interview, Zullo revealed that during the course of his investigation, he came into possession of a hard-copy Hawaii birth certificate generated in 1960, approximately 15 months prior to Obama’s alleged birth, which is “half-typed and half-handwritten.”

In an interview which took place approximately two weeks before the White House released the long-form image, former HDOH Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino was quoted by NBC News as having said that she had viewed Obama’s original birth record and that it was “half typed and half handwritten.”

Hawaii’s 2011 statute governing who could view a vital statistics record does not include the health department director, but rather, only individuals who have demonstrated “a direct and tangible interest in the record” such as a parent, legal guardian, or a person who shares an ancestor with the “registrant.”

Prior to 2011, Fukino was reported to have “inspected” Obama’s birth certificate on two occasions in order to prepare public statements about his alleged birthplace, nationality and eligibility for the office of president as a result of a questioning American electorate resulting from credible reports that Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia.

On October 31, 2008, Fukino stated:


On July 29, 2009, she made her second public statement:

On April 26, 2011, CNN presented a two-part special in which Gary Tuchman interviewed Fukino, who again stated that there existed “no doubt” that Obama was born in Hawaii based on the records she had allegedly seen.  Tuchman additionally reported that “original” birth certificates “are no longer certified by the state.”

During the segment, a “short-form” birth certificate bearing Obama’s information was shown but attributed to “Factcheck.org.”

The following day, the long-form image appeared on the White House website, said to be a PDF of a “certified” copy of Obama’s original, more detailed birth record.

At the conclusion of CNN’s first installment of the two-part series, host Anderson Cooper urged his audience to return for Part 2 the following evening, during which people who allegedly “knew President Obama as an infant, an American infant” would be interviewed.  One of those individuals shown in a brief video clip in Part 1 is former Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie.

However, Part 2, which also showed what appeared to be microfilm of a birth certificate and could have been misleading to the viewer, has been mysteriously removed from the outlet’s website. CNN did not respond to this writer’s query, submitted when Part 2 was still available, as to exactly whose birth certificate was depicted by the microfilm.

Interestingly, in 2012, Duncan Sunahara was denied access to his deceased sister’s original birth certificate, with two state courts ruling in favor of then-HDOH Director Loretta Fuddy’s decision to withhold a certified copy of the Certificate of Live Birth generated for Virginia Sunahara and issue only a “short-form” birth certificate.

Fuddy reportedly oversaw the copying of Obama’s original birth certificate in what was said to be a notable exception from Department protocol after Obama’s personal attorney, Judith Corley, requested it.

In December 2013, Fuddy was reported to have passed away as a result of a cardiac event after the small plane in which she was traveling on official business was forced to make a water landing due to engine failure.

The image on the White House website is completely typed, although Zullo’s investigation revealed various anomalies, inconsistencies and the lack of a raised seal by the registrar’s office.

At approximately 1:55:00 in the Hagmann interview, Zullo raised the fact that in January 2011, then-Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie had “discovered a document in the archives in Hawaii” noting Obama’s birth which was “half-typed and half-written.”  Although launching a very visible campaign to locate and produce Obama’s original birth certificate from within the state’s “archives,” Abercrombie abandoned his mission within a week, citing the state’s “privacy laws” prohibiting the release of vital records not one’s own.

Zullo went on to hypothesize, in light of the partially-handwritten 1960 birth certificate in his possession, that a Hawaii birth certificate containing handwritten information was considered incomplete by the Health Department and was likely maintained outside of the standard record books until the complete data on the birth was provided.

Zullo said that in 1965, an “amended” birth certificate was issued for the child born in 1960 following his adoption.  That document is completely typewritten, Zullo said, contains the original serial number and indicates that it was “accepted” by the registrar in 1965. The individual indicated as the child’s mother is reportedly not the same as the mother indicated on the partially-handwritten, incomplete birth record.

He said that “birth certificates are typed up at the hospital” where the birth occurred and then sent to the Department of Health but that the child born in 1960 was not born in a hospital.  Zullo reminded listeners that at the time, Hawaii law mandated that the Health Department issue a birth certificate upon the report of any state resident of the alleged event.

The statute governing the obtaining of an “amended” birth certificate today states that “the following persons may apply for an amended certificate of birth:

  • A person born in the State of Hawaii who already has a birth certificate filed with the Department of Health and
    1. has become legally adopted, or
    2. is requesting a new birth certificate with a sex designation change, or
    3. a legal determination of the nonexistence of a parent and child relationship for a person identified as a parent on the birth certificate on file has been made, or
    4. previously recorded information in relation to the person’s surname and/or the father’s personal particulars has been altered pursuant to law.
  • A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii.”


Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. To Adrien Nash,
    Very impressive piece of work Mr. Nash. If only a few pieces of evidence could be turned to corroborate it. The logic is very impressive IMO.

  2. As I’ve shared in multiple expositions, baby Obama was not born in Hawaii but his mother sought to register him there and obtain a birth certificate as if he had been. So she went to the DoH and was given a Late Birth Certificate Application which was an information form constituting an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury.

    The problem was that that was not enough. The state also required an additional affidavit from an unrelated witness or medical professional attending a home (or highway) birth. No such witness existed and no one was willing to lie for her and undergo the mandatory interrogation as to the facts of the birth. So the DoH was left with her hand-written affidavit (birth record / birth document) whose information was repeated via typewriter, hence, half hand-written and half typed. That affidavit is what Fuddy allowed Obama’s counterfeiters access to to digitally copy it’s original info and writing.

    Note that no one from the government in Hawaii has ever said that Obama had an original Hawaiian hospital certificate of live birth, not once. That is because he was not born in a Hawaiian hospital nor even in Hawaii. He was born in Vancouver, B.C. as I’ve laid-out in an extensive backward engineering of his birth circumstances.
    I first explained the truth about who is and is not a natural born citizen, and then shift into the Seattle Scenario. You can read it here: http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/2013/10/11/reverse-engineering-dunham-obama/

    It begins: Reverse Engineering the Dunham-Obama Timeline & Story
    A Tale of Four Theories

    In order to determine the truth about Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as the American President it is necessary to exam two subjects completely unrelated to each other, -those being the location of his birth and the nationality of his parents.

  3. U.S. citizens should not have to worry about guessing where aka HUSSEIN Obama is from. As a (putative) POTUS, his whole life should have been an open book from birth.

    Rather, the U.S. justice system should focus on the criminal obfuscation and fraudulent offering by many complicit participants of aka Obama’s background documentation.

    aka Obama’s criminal and unConstitutional behavior and record as the putative 44th POTUS should be a candidate for a U.S. citizens’ grand jury.

  4. I only add my ongoing belief that he is Indonesian, and was born in Indonesia. On this, there seem to be two scenarios. He was, literally, a street orphan who was picked up either by Stanley Ann or someone close to her. The second is the “way out there” theory that he is a son of Michael Rockefeller and the mother was an Indonesian woman.

    As such an orphan, then taken to Hawaii, this would also fit with Elmo’s point.

    However it works out, to me his facial features are more Indonesian than anything else.

  5. I haven’t seen many aritcles (lately) that look into an “adoption scenario” for Obama.
    If Obama was adopted by Stanley Ann, a new Birth Certificate would issue (naming the adopters as parents) and the original “Birth Ceritficate” would be sealed. That may have been what Abercrummy was referring to (“Half typed half hand written”).
    answers a lot of questions (IMO)

    Hawaii Law re: Adoption BCs :
    Access to Original Birth Certificate Citation: Rev. Stat. §§ 578-14; 578-15; 338-20
    If a new birth certificate is issued, the original birth certificate shall be sealed. The sealed document may be opened by the department only by an order of a court or when requested in accordance with § 578-15.