Of Eligibility and Project Cassandra, R.I.P.

“THE TREACHEROUS INSINUATION OF FOREIGN INFLUENCE”

by Joseph DeMaio, ©2017

(Dec. 26, 2017) — So, all you defenders of Barack Hussein Obama’s purported constitutional eligibility to have served as the nation’s president… how do you feel now?  And by that, I mean how do you explain your support for BHO now that it appears that your vaunted “Hawaiian-born” [sic] former chief executive seems to have been involved in direct efforts to subvert the criminal investigation and prosecution here in the United States of that peace-loving organization Hezbollah in order to facilitate his cherished Iran nuclear deal?

Oh, sorry… my bad… very few Obots read The P&E.  Too insightful and accurate for their limited intellect.

As broken by the not-so-conservative website Politico.com, there now appears to be a rising tide of evidence that the Obama Administration actively “colluded” with Iran in order to frustrate and ultimately kill an ongoing criminal investigation of Hezbollah involving drug trafficking in the United States, money laundering worldwide and weapons trafficking.  Why?  Well, in order to ease entry into the treasonous Iran nuclear “deal” then being pursued by the Usurper-in-Chief.

The Wall Street Journal chimed in that the Obama regime (in fairness, the WSJ used the clinical, but altogether inaccurate and misleading term “Administration”… sigh…) had provided a “Pass for Hezbollah” in “tamping down” the Drug Enforcement Administration’s “Project Cassandra.”  All for the end result that the mullahs in Teheran would be pacified and not become “anxious” that completion of the utterly stupid and dangerous Iran nuclear deal might be jeopardized.  The WSJ ended its editorial with the sage observation that “this warrants a congressional investigation.”  Duh.

Message to the Obots out there, both of you who read The P&E: this situation is precisely why the Founding Fathers – those XY chromosome beings who drafted and signed the U.S. Constitution – specified that only a “natural born citizen” should ever be eligible to serve as president.  Otherwise, the potential for the treacherous insinuation of foreign influence into the office would be heightened, a peril which the Founders sought to completely eliminate.

And that, Virginia, is why Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5 of the Constitution exists.  As understood by the Founders, one could be a natural born citizen only if born in the United States to a mother and father – also known as “parents” – who were both at the time of birth already U.S. citizens, the misleading “products” of the Congressional Research Service and the pontifications of respected constitutional “scholars” aside.

There is a mountain of direct and anecdotal evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not now, was not in 2008 or 2012 and will not be at any time in the future a “natural born citizen” as contemplated by the Founders.  It is amusing that Obama once “taught” constitutional law, but seemingly without understanding the “Constitution.”  Sad, but oh-so-Machiavellian.

As proof of the validity of the Founders’ concerns about eligibility to the office of the president being strictly confined to a “natural born citizen” as they understood the term, one need look no farther than the efforts of the Obama regime to crush a federal DEA investigation into an organization engaged in hyper-felonious activities here and whose favorite chant is “Death to America.”

Nice going, Obots, you jerks.  Go eat a MAGA cap.

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

8 Responses to "Of Eligibility and Project Cassandra, R.I.P."

  1. T.F B0W   Friday, December 29, 2017 at 7:40 PM

    Mike Zullo was again on “Freedom Friday.” Something about the alignment of “East Africa” on Obama’s long form.

    Radio was perhaps not the best medium for Zullo to discuss visual anomalies that he perceived.

  2. T.F. B0W   Friday, December 29, 2017 at 1:22 AM

    A quick internet search will reveal that Obama spent this Christmas in Hawaii; he was serenaded by carolers.

  3. Sharon Rondeau   Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM

    From reports I have seen, Trump’s mother naturalized four years before he was born:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Anne_MacLeod_Trump

  4. Howard Appel   Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 5:25 PM

    So, according to this analysis, a son born to a US citizen father and an immigrant Scottish (or as Trump would put it – Scotch) mother (who is not a US citizen at the time of the birth of the son) is not eligible to be President. That means Donald Trump is not eligible to be President of the US. His father was a citizen at the time Donald was born, but his mother was not. Additionally, that also means that none of Donald’s children (other than Tiffany) are eligible. Ivana Trump, the mother of Ivanka, Donald Jr. and Eric was not a citizen at the time of their births and Melanie (not sure of spelling) was not a citizen when Barron was born.

    Bummer deal dudes.

  5. T.F B0W   Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 12:10 PM

    What is an “Obot”? What makes an “Obot” different from the majority of Americans who twice voted for Obama?

  6. ZM   Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 12:07 PM

    Does anyone know if the Obama’s took a two week vacation to Hawaii during the Christmas holiday as they had done the previous eight years while occupying the WH? That always seemed to be a very extravagant trip considering they had to have the secret service and all the other folks accompany them. Wasn’t this yearly trip to capitalize on the false fact Hawaii was home to him?

  7. Bob68   Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 11:14 PM

    Thanks, very good article. There are a few Obots who still come here, or maybe just one Obot using several names. They don’t care how wrong they are, they are just doing the dirty job they, for whatever misguided reason, took on. I doubt anything Obama did will ever bother them because if it did, they would stop defending him…….but, they won’t. To them Obama can do no wrong because, he was, (part), black and any criticism of him was and still is, “racist”, and for some, they were/are being paid to defend Obama.

    And maybe the Obots thinking was easily influenced by this:
    http://www.pennypresslv.com/Obama%27s_Use_of_Hidden_Hypnosis_techniques_in_His_Speeches.pdf

  8. Jeffrey Harrison   Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 7:09 PM

    This is a real nice article. Indeed, I did make several copies. In a couple days I will write, fax and sent it to my Congressmen and Senator, as well to my local news paper.

    Thanks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.