The Constitution Must Mean Exactly What it Says, or it Means Nothing at All

SUPREME COURT DENIES WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN NJ SECOND AMENDMENT CASE

by Nicholas E. Purpura, ©2017

(Nov. 16, 2017) — This first article will deal with a stolen right; the Second Amendment. Unquestionably the most important Amendment set forth in the “Bill of Rights.”  Liberty and freedom as well as our Constitution itself, without it, the Constitution would be nothing more than a piece of paper containing meaningless words of wishful thinking.

Before the Supreme Court of these United States, was a “Writ for Certiorari,” Docket No. 17-280 Purpura v. Gov. Christie et al., Docketed on August 23, 2017 that; if heard, by established law and previous precedent by this same Supreme Court would restored our Second Amendment right in New Jersey and throughout the country. On October 30, 2017, void any review at all, It has been summarily denied.  In fairness to the Honorable Justices on the bench, after careful investigation, it has been discovered; not a single Justice had an ‘opportunity’ to see or address the “Application to Expedite” or “Petition for Certiorari,” if they had your Second Amendment right would have been indisputably restored.

The decision not to forward the Petition to the Justices was made by a single inexperienced recent graduate of law school, chosen for the “Cert-pool.” Clerks fear sticking their necks out to recommend a pro se petition that may be dismissed as “improvidently granted.”  Which would be a significant embarrassment to the clerk in question.  Therefore, the risk-averse thing to do is to recommend not to take a case.” Sadly, evidence exits that indicates that only a handful of lawyers have had success in getting their petitions heard on constitutional challenges.

Justices expect authoritative arguments based upon legal precedent and established principles of law as well as the legal implications of public importance. Regardless of the public importance, a case filed by a pro se goes unread.  Facts, law, reason, and the abundance of the Court’s own prior holdings, which this Petition contained, were totally ignored.

See, attached is a 12-page Application for a rehearing containing three irrefutable arguments ignored by all three Federal Courts. After reading the three questions presented on the first page:  Petitioner challenges the entire “Cert-pool” as to why the Court should not grant a rehearing.

Also see, attached for Petition for Rehearing & original Petition Writ for Certiorari  

LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD – WE NEED YOUR HELP                                              

Respectfully write and request the Court grant a rehearing, Docket 17-280, to restore our Second Amendment right:

SUPREME COURT of the United States
1  First Street N.E.
Washington DC, 20543

This Supreme Court has the fiduciary duty to protect the Constitution especially when the Petition is supported by prior precedent and statutory law. The citizens of these United States rely upon this Court to guard against anti-federalism.  They deserve a fair hearing and a ruling that will provide for consistency in the matter of federalism, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights.

Failure to address this Petition is to condone unconstitutional  de facto administrative law and legislation previously found to be unconstitutional by this very same judicial body. That failure would effectively enlarge, to a greater extent than it is presently, a pathway to tyranny.   If the illegal collusion, detailed and proven in our Petition, is permitted to continue unabated and without consequence, future generations, less safe and less free, will know at which feet will lay the culpability.

The Eagle

Nicholas E. Purpura, Chaplain

Rehearing Purpura v Christie, 17-280

Petition for Writ