MUELLER, COMEY COULD BE CALLED AS WITNESSES AND POSSIBLY BECOME DEFENDANTS
by Sharon Rondeau
Also found to be fraudulent early in the investigation is Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.
Those findings have never been investigated by the FBI, although in July 2012, following a second press conference on the matter, an FBI spokesman confirmed to this publication that he personally “watched the whole thing.”
Although the FBI is tasked with investigating federal crimes, the spokesman suggested that citizens concerned that a crime might have been committed “contact their congressman.”
Congress is not tasked constitutionally with investigating crimes, although both Senate and House committees often conduct investigations potentially leading to evidence of criminal activity. Many such probes lead to no indictment, as in the case of four dead Americans in Benghazi, Libya and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server over which she is known to have sent classified information to unauthorized parties.
Congress has also declined to look into the findings of forgery and fraud in Obama’s only publicly-proffered “documentation.”
According to The Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who was FBI director under George W. Bush and Obama through September 4, 2013, has impaneled a federal grand jury in his ongoing “Russia” investigations. Mueller was hired in May to purportedly serve as an impartial and experienced investigator into whether or not Trump and/or any of his campaign aides “colluded” with Russian officials to help Trump wIn the 2016 presidential election. Mueller is also expected to uncover the extent to which Russia may have interfered in the U.S. election process.
The general public was unaware until after Mueller was installed as Special Counsel that the day before he accepted that position, he interviewed with Donald Trump for the FBI Director position following James Comey’s dismissal on May 9.
Many Americans have expressed concern that Mueller’s probe is now being fueled by “mission creep” to extend far beyond the original two-pronged “Russia” concern.
When The Post & Email was told by the FBI spokesman that concerned citizens should contact their Congressman rather than the FBI about the Obama forgeries, Mueller was FBI director.
As Mueller’s successor, Comey did nothing to discover why the de facto president’s documentation had been created after the fact and foisted on an unsuspecting public with the “collusion” of the mainstream media.
Comey and Mueller are former colleagues, raising the question as to why Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein hired Mueller to oversee investigations which would inevitably involve Comey as well as why Mueller did not himself see a conflict of interest and decline the invitation.
If Trump’s Department of Justice launched an investigation into the Obama forgeries, Mueller and Comey would doubtless be called to testify as to their action or lack thereof in discovering who created the fraudulent documents and why.
A grand jury could be impaneled, witnesses called, original documents subpoenaed, and any suspects, if they exist, could be subpoenaed to testify. The witness list could include the two forensic analysts who confirmed the conclusions of forgery reached by lead investigator Mike Zullo as announced in a December press conference.
If Mueller can impanel a grand jury in the scope of his investigations, the Department of Justice can convene one to examine the extensive evidence, absent the original documents, strongly suggesting fraud, forgery, and possibly other federal crimes which obviously reach the highest levels of government.