The DOJ Should Convene a Grand Jury to Investigate the Obama Birth Certificate Forgery

MUELLER, COMEY COULD BE CALLED AS WITNESSES AND POSSIBLY BECOME DEFENDANTS

by Sharon Rondeau

(Aug. 4, 2017) — On April 27, 2011, an image purported to represent the “long-form” birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama was posted on the White House website “with the intent to deceive,” according to the former detective who conducted a 5+-year investigation into the issue.

Also found to be fraudulent early in the investigation is Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.

Those findings have never been investigated by the FBI, although in July 2012, following a second press conference on the matter, an FBI spokesman confirmed to this publication that he personally “watched the whole thing.”

Although the FBI is tasked with investigating federal crimes, the spokesman suggested that citizens concerned that a crime might have been committed “contact their congressman.”

Congress is not tasked constitutionally with investigating crimes, although both Senate and House committees often conduct investigations potentially leading to evidence of criminal activity.  Many such probes lead to no indictment, as in the case of four dead Americans in Benghazi, Libya and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server over which she is known to have sent classified information to unauthorized parties.

Congress has also declined to look into the findings of forgery and fraud in Obama’s only publicly-proffered “documentation.”

According to The Wall Street Journal on Thursday, Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III, who was FBI director under George W. Bush and Obama through September 4, 2013, has impaneled a federal grand jury in his ongoing “Russia” investigations.   Mueller was hired in May to purportedly serve as an impartial and experienced investigator into whether or not Trump and/or any of his campaign aides “colluded” with Russian officials to help Trump wIn the 2016 presidential election. Mueller is also expected to uncover the extent to which Russia may have interfered in the U.S. election process.

The general public was unaware until after Mueller was installed as Special Counsel that the day before he accepted that position, he interviewed with Donald Trump for the FBI Director position following James Comey’s dismissal on May 9.

Many Americans have expressed concern that Mueller’s probe is now being fueled by “mission creep” to extend far beyond the original two-pronged “Russia” concern.

When The Post & Email was told by the FBI spokesman that concerned citizens should contact their Congressman rather than the FBI about the Obama forgeries, Mueller was FBI director.

As Mueller’s successor, Comey did nothing to discover why the de facto president’s documentation had been created after the fact and foisted on an unsuspecting public with the “collusion” of the mainstream media.

Comey and Mueller are former colleagues, raising the question as to why Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein hired Mueller to oversee investigations which would inevitably involve Comey as well as why Mueller did not himself see a conflict of interest and decline the invitation.

If Trump’s Department of Justice launched an investigation into the Obama forgeries, Mueller and Comey would doubtless be called to testify as to their action or lack thereof in discovering who created the fraudulent documents and why.

A grand jury could be impaneled, witnesses called, original documents subpoenaed, and any suspects, if they exist, could be subpoenaed to testify.  The witness list could include the two forensic analysts who confirmed the conclusions of forgery reached by lead investigator Mike Zullo as announced in a December press conference.

If Mueller can impanel a grand jury in the scope of his investigations, the Department of Justice can convene one to examine the extensive evidence, absent the original documents, strongly suggesting fraud, forgery, and possibly other federal crimes which obviously reach the highest levels of government.

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

18 Responses to "The DOJ Should Convene a Grand Jury to Investigate the Obama Birth Certificate Forgery"

  1. Philo Vance   Monday, August 7, 2017 at 10:46 AM

    The comments to Gallups’ FaceBook post are pretty funny.

  2. T.F. B0W   Monday, August 7, 2017 at 8:33 AM

    Why would Gallups think anyone would be in a position to disprove Zullo’s information if Zullo won’t release his information to anyone?

  3. Philo Vance   Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 11:02 PM

    Carl Gallups has a FaceBook post on this very issue.

    https://www.facebook.com/carlgallups2/photos/a.380203522019109.83236.358058554233606/1457684844270966/?type=3&theater

  4. Rattlerjake   Sunday, August 6, 2017 at 6:26 PM

    Robert Laity and Gary Wilmott – There are three kinds of people in this world, the smart, those that think they are smart, and the stupid. All Obots fall into the last two categories. These are the same people that believe in anything that the “majority”, usually lead by government, has chosen to believe. They do not possess the ability to reason or common sense. They believe in evolution, that man landed on the moon, that a handful of dunecoons accomplished 9-11, that JFK was killed by Oswald, global warming, etc. There is no amount of physical evidence that you can produce that will make them see the error in their beliefs. The fact that the “birther” movement seems to have dissolved makes them believe even more that they are right, it doesn’t even register that it is because government refuses to even investigate it, that something so important takes a back seat to investigating and trying to convict a baker that refused to make a cake for a certain couple!

    God said:
    Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.
    Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

    As a dog returneth to his vomit, so a fool returneth to his folly.

    Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
    Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
    Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!

  5. Rob Marshall   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 5:08 PM

    Gary Willmott, why is Bill Bryan a disgrace? What has he said that is untrue?

  6. Gary Wilmott   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM

    Bill Bryan you are truly a disgrace.

  7. Bill Bryan   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 11:11 AM

    I should explain – Fogbow isn’t focused on the birther movement anymore. The birther movement is dead, except for (as Mr. Wilmott said), a “tiny” few people. In its heyday, there were dozens of birther websites and hundreds of birthers online, and the birthers filed more than 230 lawsuits, nationwide.

    Those days are over. Fogbow now spends far more time and energy following the sovereign citizen movement and the Trump resistance movement. We have people who keep track of what little birther activity there is, but as a group we’ve moved on. The plain fact is, the birther movement is BORING. Nobody ever has anything new to say.

    And all the birther lawyers dropped off the face of the Earth. Taitz, Apuzzo, Irion, Berg, The Pidge … not one of them is still working on a birther case. Judy’s case is too stupid to be worth following. The lawsuits are all dead, and the birther movement is dead. Even Trump isn’t a birther anymore.

    Arpaio has a group of high caliber lawyers. Not one of them is a birther. The guy who ran Birtherreport.com croaked. Gallups and Zullo are still running their mouths, but honestly …

    Q. How long can you fool a birther into thinking you have evidence, without ever showing anybody that evidence?

    A. So far, more than 5 years, except the number of birthers who are fooled has dwindled to just a tiny few.

    The sovereign citizen movement and the Trump resistance movement are the only ones left that have any real interest today. If it wasn’t for them, I would have closed Fogbow down years ago.

    That’s my story, and I’m stickin’ with it.

    Bill Bryan (Foggy)

  8. T.F. B0W   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM

    What does “pursue” really mean? Laity does have a pending court case (challenging Cruz’s eligibility) but it, like every case before it, is destined to be denied. The same is true for Judy’s.

    Zullo and Gallups talk a good game, but there’s no indication they’ve actually done anything since December. Arpaio is now focused on appealing his own criminal conviction.

    Notably, the president has shown no interest in this topic since running for office (other than to claim that Clinton started it). Nor has any Member of Congress shown interest. Nor any official in any branch at any level of government.

  9. Bill Bryan   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM

    Mr. Laity and Mr. Wilmott, I heartily encourage you to follow your dream for as long as you are able to do so. Maybe someday, you can convince a real grownup that President Obama was ineligible to serve as president. Also, maybe someday Santa Claus will bring you a pony. You gotta have a dream, if you don’t have a dream, how you gonna make a dream come true?

    Bill Bryan (Foggy)

  10. Robert Laity   Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 5:05 AM

    Bill Bryan, I INTEND to pursue this issue until “the day” that I “DIE”! The quest is well worth it. Obama committed high level espionage and treason against the people of the United States. There has been much blood shed in order to defend this nation against it’s enemies. Our dead veteran warriors cry from Heaven for justice. If you do not think that this is mission is “pathetic” or “meaningless” then you are to be pitied as someone who cares very little about preserving our nations freedoms and liberties. “There is NO ‘President’ Obama”: http://www.thepostemail.com/09/17/2010/there-is-no-president-obama/

  11. Dave L.   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 9:15 PM

    The British East Africa Protectorate comprised the land area of present day Kenya. In 1920 it was divided up and renamed the Colony and Protectorate of Kenya. The Protectorate of Kenya was comprised of the area along the coast and the Colony of Kenya was the inland portion.

    https://books.google.vg/books?id=PzTS61nkQPkC&lpg=PA783&dq=Kenya%20Annexation%20Order&pg=PA783#v=onepage&q=Kenya%20Annexation%20Order&f=false

    That someone who grew up in the 1940s and 50s in Kenya referred to it as Kenya, East Africa is not particularly surprising.

  12. Mark Billison   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 7:23 PM

    I talked to someone on the FBI and she said that after the July 2012 press conference they did a cursory exam of the claims and found that the two main claims (pencil number 9 and out of sequence cert numbers) were false. They had already looked into the layers claim from the first press conference and knew that was false. So they concluded the investigation was either a sham or incompetent.

    At the time Zullo said they used real experts.

    But Zullo himself now admits that the layers, cert number and pencil 9 are not proof of forgery.

    Obviously with that track record, the FBI is not going to pursue any new claims by Zullo

  13. T.F. B0W   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 7:19 PM

    “Either Kenya becoming independent in 1963 is a lie or the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate is a lie.”

    More precisely, the information on the birth certificate was imprecise. In at least Hawaii, information on birth certificates about the parents is self-reported. Miki Booth, who has given birth in Hawaii, has explained this.

    So “Kenya, East Africa” was merely the information reported, presumably by Obama’s mother.

  14. Gary Wilmott   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 6:27 PM

    To Foggy and all the other pathetic Obots…keep it up. Your ridicule, lies, deceit and anti-American agenda will eventually be exposed. We, the so-called tiny birther community are a patient group because we know we have the truth on our side. We will continue our “whining.” Meantime enjoy your small and unpleasant place in history.

  15. michael d jackson   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 6:12 PM

    Excuse me Mr. Bow and Mr. Hudson,

    How do you explain your lie away when Kenya was a British colony in 1961 A.D. and this British colony did not gain its independence nor exist until 1963? (http://www.kenyaembassy.com/aboutkenyahistory.html)

    A purported 1961 U.S. government identity document (birth certificate) belonging to Barack Hussein Obama, in box 11 shows the birth place of reported father Barack Hussein Obama as Kenya, East Africa.

    Either Kenya becoming independent in 1963 is a lie or the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate is a lie.

    “The lip of truth is established for ever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment” Proverbs 12:19 KJB

    “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a
    man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth
    to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that
    soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting” Galatians 6:7,8 KJB

  16. Bill Bryan   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 4:34 PM

    I hope to see the birthers constantly, constantly whining about Obama until the day I die. I mean, it’s not like they have anything else to do with their pathetic, meaningless lives, right? .

  17. Lane Hudson   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 3:07 PM

    T.F.Bow wrote

    “Perhaps there would be more interest in such an endeavor if Mike Zullo publicly released these analysts’ conclusions.”

    And perhaps pink unicorns will fly into my backyard tonight. It wouldn’t make any difference. No one outside the tiny remaining Birther community takes Zullo’s investigation seriously. The Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution makes Hawaii the final authority on the authenticity of its vital records.

    While we would all like to see Reed Hayes and Forlab’s reports they would not matter. At this point one would have to conclude there are very good reasons Zullo has never released them. It is probably because they are inconclusive and don’t say what Zullo has claimed they say.

    This article should be tagged “pipe dream” and/or “satire”.

  18. T.F. B0W   Friday, August 4, 2017 at 1:37 PM

    Perhaps there would be more interest in such an endeavor if Mike Zullo publicly released these analysts’ conclusions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.