BUT DOES ANYONE BELIEVE IT?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Dec. 26, 2016) — In a recorded interview with Obama-friendly CNN broadcast on Christmas Day, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told host Brian Stelter that “President Obama has been the most transparent president in American history,” despite the long-form birth certificate forgery posted at whitehouse.gov on April 27, 2011 representing Obama’s original birth certificate from Hawaii.
Earnest further told Stelter of Obama and “transparency” that “he has not gotten much, if any, credit for that from journalists.”
Most “journalists” have not reported that shortly after the long-form image was posted and claimed by Obama as his own in a press conference that morning, it was declared a forgery by several graphics and computer professionals, which led to a five-year criminal investigation into both the birth certificate and Obama’s Selective Service registration form.
During a March 1, 2012 press conference, it was announced by the lead criminal investigator that probable cause was found to believe that both Obama identity “documents” are fraudulent.
The birth certificate was said to be a “computer-generated forgery” and the Selective Service form a “hard-copy forgery.”
The media failed to disseminate the investigators’ findings on television and radio, limiting its coverage to the internet with notable skepticism but launching no independent investigations of its own.
A second presser on July 17, 2012 revealed that the standard of probable cause had been surpassed by new information gleaned from the continued investigation of the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse.
On December 15, 2016, posse lead investigator Mike Zullo and Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio gave a third and final press conference detailing the discovery that nine items were placed at precisely the same angles and relative positions as they appeared on a long-form birth certificate belonging to Johanna Ah’Nee, who was born on August 20, 1961 at Kapiolani Women and Children’s Hospital.
Obama claims he was born on August 4, 1961 at the same hospital. The White House released the long-form image as a result of outspoken pressure from then-businessman and possible presidential candidate Donald Trump, who will be sworn in as Obama’s successor on January 20.
The media responded similarly as it did after the two previous pressers, reporting that Arpaio and Zullo had been seeking to discover Obama’s birthplace when that had never been a focus of the investigation. Some in the media headlined that the investigation is now “closed.”
Conversely, Zullo said in an interview several days later of the work which has been done, “We’re not stopping.”
Other than in jest or ridicule, the mainstream media has failed to report on credible statements made by its cohorts long before Obama sought the presidency that he was born in Kenya or Indonesia while aware that the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen.”
Chris Matthews of MSNBC and Will Hoover, formerly of The Honolulu Advertiser, both affirmed that Obama was “born in Indonesia” before the 2008 primary season. Both later changed their statements.
Arpaio said that his goal is to turn over the evidence collected by the investigation over the past 5+ years to “federal authorities” and Congress.
During this month’s press conference, Zullo revealed that two forensic document experts reached the same conclusion, without knowledge of each other’s work, after examining the Ah’Nee document.
As Obama prepares to depart the White House, where he might not have been qualified to serve, many in the media speculate as to what his “legacy” will be.
Could it be felony forgery?