If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

The FBI claims that “public corruption” is its “top priority”

(Jul. 5, 2016) — On November 13, 2009, an individual contacted the New Haven, CT office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) asking for an investigation of Barack Hussein Obama, who many Americans believe is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution to serve as president.

The email was written after the release in June 2008 of a “short-form” Certification of Live Birth (COLB) purported to be Obama’s only birth record stating that he was born in Honolulu, HI on August 4, 1961.

The COLB was noted to be lacking an official raised seal and registrar’s stamp.  Contrary to many mainstream media reports, the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) has never said that the image originated from its office in Honolulu.

On April 27, 2011, the White House posted what it said was a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate to quell concerns raised by Donald Trump that Obama did not meet the “natural born Citizen” requirement and amid reports that the COLB, posted at the White House website along with the long-form, was a forgery.

Within 24 hours, experts deemed the “long-form” image at whitehouse.gov to be an easily-detected forgery.

In September of that year, a criminal investigation was launched by the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse into the long-form birth certificate which determined and announced publicly six months later that the image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

The posse also found that a second “document” bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama” is fraudulent:  his purported Selective Service registration form.

Over the last week, CCP lead investigator Mike Zullo has given at least two interviews on the topic of Obama’s Selective Service form specifically, tying its lack of authenticity to an option published by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) last year stating that a new citizen taking the oath of allegiance can omit the pledge to “bear arms” in defense of his new nation.

The initial email to the FBI reads:

From: Redacted
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:57 PM
To: New Haven

I am hereby filing a criminal complaint against Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein Obama, for usurping the office of the President of the United States .  He is by definition not an Article II, Section 1 “natural born citizen” because he acknowledges that his father was a citizen of Great Britain at the time of his birth.  The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in four different cases that a “natural born citizen” is not the same as a “citizen” or “native born citizen.”

Soetoro/Obama has never proved that he is even a citizen of this country.  Evidence has been gathered by two private investigators, Neil Sankey and Susan Daniels (www.orlytaitzesq.com) that Obama has used more than 30 social security numbers over his lifetime, including that belonging to a deceased man from Connecticut .  Have you investigated this, since the decedent was a Connecticut resident?

On January 21, 2009, the day after Soetoro/Obama was illegally sworn in as president, he signed an executive order denying access to all of his personal records except om the approval of his criminal attorney general, Eric Holder.  This is a clear usurpation of power on the part of the executive branch, and the chief executive, specifically.

I would like to know why the FBI continues to turn a blind eye to the crimes of Soetoro/Obama instead of arresting him for the fraud and deceit he has perpetrated upon this country.  I would like to know why the entire government is pretending that all is well when we have been invaded by a foreign enemy.  I would like to know why the entire executive branch has not been arrested for their cover-up of this incredible crime and the election fraud that made it happen.

And how about all of the foreign donations?  What are you doing about that?  Are you even prosecuting crime any longer? I would like a formal response to this inquiry.

The FBI, or someone representing himself to be a representative of the federal law enforcement agency, responded:

From: New Haven
To: Redacted
Sent:Saturday, November 14, 2009 8:27 AM

You do realize that since he was born in Hawaii that makes him a U.S. citizen no matter what nationality his father was at the time. He was born in 1961, 2 yrs after Hawaii was made the 50th state in the country. There is nothing illegal about his presidency, he has not utilized 30 different social security numbers either.

 The citizen then replied:

From: Redacted
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 8:48 AM
To: New Haven

Is this an official response from the FBI?  This reply does not meet what I would expect to be FBI professional standards.  Either you have someone answering unofficially for your office, or your email has been hacked.  You might want to investigate that at this point.

to which the following response was received:

New Haven <NewHaven@ic.fbi.gov>
11/14/09 at 9:05 AM
To:  Redacted

This is our response. Or email has not been hacked, though the format is off, it is officially the FBI’s stand.

On Tuesday, following an alleged year-long investigation into whether or not then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton violated federal law by using a home-based, private email server to send both personal and official State Department correspondence, some of which was later designated “classified,” FBI Director James Comey said that his agency would not recommend criminal charges be filed against Clinton.

Comey prefaced the announcement by stating that Clinton and her aides had been “extremely careless” in their management of official communications, some of which were later identified as “classified.”

In May, a Romanian citizen brought to the U.S. to stand trial for allegedly hacking into Clinton’s private email account pleaded guilty to “charges of identity theft and unauthorized access to protected computers.”

According to NPR on Tuesday:

Clinton has said that she never used her personal email to send information that was marked classified at the time, although some of her emails had been retroactively classified.

Comey says that’s not true. Of 30,000 emails Clinton turned over to the State Department in 2014, FBI investigators found 110 emails containing information that was classified at the time the email was sent. Eight of those were top secret, the highest level of classification.

U.S. Code, Section 1001, renders lying to “government agents” a federal crime.  Hillary Clinton has been noted to have been untruthful on a number of occasions.  On Saturday, she was interviewed by the FBI for more than three hours, although the substance of the discussions has not yet been made public.

In 2005, entrepreneur and multi-millionaire Martha Stewart went to federal prison for five months for allegedly obstructing justice by lying to the FBI.

On July 17, 2012, the Cold Case Posse gave a follow-up to its first press conference in regard to the criminal investigation of Obama’s documents, during which more details were made available.  The following day, The Post & Email contacted the Washington, DC bureau of the FBI to inquire as to whether or not it was aware of the posse’s findings.  After being transferred to approximately five different people, we finally were connected with a media representative, who we asked (paraphrased), “Were you aware of the press conference given yesterday regarding Obama’s documentation?”

His response was, “Yes, I watched the whole thing.”

When Zullo and Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who commissioned the investigation, asked Selective Service System Director Lawrence Romo to inspect a certified copy or microfilm of Obama’s Selective Service registration form, Romo declined the request through an agency representative and changed the policy by which such records are maintained.  According to Zullo in an interview with The Post & Email last week, Romo’s declared alternation to the policy “stonewalled our investigation.”

The same Selective Service representative, Associate Director of Public & Intergovernmental Affairs Richard S. Flavahan, wrote in a letter dated March 22, 2012 to Arpaio:

This Agency has no evidence that President Obama’s 1980 registration is not authentic.  However, if you have any credible evidence to the contrary and believe that a Federal crime has been committed, we suggest that it be turned over immediately to the Federal Bureau of Investigation to pursue.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The FBI said they are interested in “public corruption”, no mention of government corruption. I suppose from what we see every day government corruption gets the “green light” from the FBI.

  2. Sharon and Friends,

    Another good job of reporting Sharon I am with you all the way, however:

    I must say, with the reputation that he has, I expected more from Jim Comey. Of course, in the pursuance of his investigation, Comey could not consider the reputation of the subject (Hillary Clinton), however the voters can consider it and I hope that come November, they remember that there seems to be a separate standard that is applied to the so called “Elites” in this country.

    Will voters remember “Airportgate” when it’s time to vote in November?

    I certainly hope so -There is a drastic difference in the visions
    of the Republican and Democrat candidates and the direction our nation takes will be affected by how YOU vote in the 2016 election.