Bill O’Reilly: Obama Angry at Trump Over “Birther” Issue

BUT HAS O’REILLY CARRIED OBAMA’S WATER ALL THESE YEARS?

by Sharon Rondeau

Has Bill O’Reilly provided cover for Obama’s lack of, or fraudulent, documentation?

(Jun. 16, 2016) — On Wednesday night’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” commentator Monica Crowley told O’Reilly that Barack Hussein Obama on Tuesday employed “vitriol” in “an incredibly obtuse, petulant speech, and it was all directed at Donald Trump.”

Crowley was referring to Obama’s heated public address clearly aimed at Trump’s contention that immigrants and “refugees” from Islamic-dominant countries should be halted at least temporarily until better vetting of terrorist connections can be assured following the Sunday morning assault on a nightclub by a radicalized Islamic.

O’Reilly does not appear to have posted the “Talking Points” segment on the free side of his website, although other segments with Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and commentator Dennis Miller are summarized.

Commentator Eboni Williams was O’Reilly’s other guest during the segment, which is referenced on the internet.

Crowley’s comments responded to O’Reilly’s wherein O’Reilly claimed that Obama wishes to retaliate against Trump for his raising of the “birther” issue, referencing Trump’s 2011 public questioning as to why Obama had not released his “long-form” birth certificate to purportedly prove that he was born in the U.S. and presumably eligible to serve as President of the United States.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen.” While most Americans had understood the term to mean “born in the country,” other historical interpretations state that the candidates parents must also be citizens at the time of the candidates birth so as to preclude any foreign allegiance.

During the 2016 presidential primary season, questions arose regarding the constitutional eligibility of U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, who was born in Canada to a Cuban-citizen father and presumed U.S.-citizen mother.  The eligibility of Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who suspended his campaign in mid-March, was also challenged because his parents were still Cuban nationals when he was born in the state of Florida in 1971.

On May 11, a highly-reliable source to The Post & Email reported that Cruz’s mother became a Canadian citizen at some point while she and Rafael Bienvenido Cruz operated a seismic-data company in Calgary, Alberta roughly between 1968 and 1974. Cruz was born on December 22, 1970 and claimed his U.S.-citizen mother as the key to his “natural born Citizen” status in the United States.

Renewed debate about “gun control” and a federal assault weapons ban have ensued since Sunday’s atrocity committed by 29-year-old Omar Mateen, whose father arrived in the U.S. from Afghanistan in the 1980s.  On a YouTube channel and his Facebook page, Seddique Mateen has made political statements involving both Afghani and U.S. affairs while stating that the U.S. has offered many in his position “a good life.”

In what some believe was deceptive reporting, O’Reilly has insisted that the “birther” controversy is a non-starter beginning in 2009.  In 2014, the prime-time Fox News Channel host reiterated that he had investigated the short-form Certification of Live Birth (COLB) image posted on a number of websites from an unnamed source during the 2008 presidential campaign.

While Hawaii statute prohibits anyone without “a direct and tangible interest” to obtain copies of vital records, O’Reilly claimed that his investigation obtained Obama’s records and found that the COLB is authentic.  He did not show footage of the purported investigation.

According to a March 30, 2011 Politico article, O’Reilly “slapped back guest Donald Trump on his show Wednesday night for embracing the ‘birther’ chatter about President Barack Obama — and insisted he doesn’t think it’s heartfelt rhetoric by the by the real estate mogul.”

Neither O’Reilly nor any Fox News host subsequently reported that after the White House released what it said was a scan of a certified copy of Obama’s long-form birth certificate in April 2011, the image was declared fraudulent by several experts. Further, a criminal investigation launched in September 2011 declared approximately six months later at a press conference that the long-form image is a “computer-generated forgery.”

The Maricopa County Cold Case Posse included in its findings that Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form mailed to an unknown number of FOIA requesters since 2008 is also fraudulent.  This publication was one of those requesters.

Just days before the release of the “long-form,” O’Reilly stated on air that ““We’re going to put this to bed tonight. He does have a legitimate birth certificate. The state of Hawaii says they have it. And we have no reason not to believe that.”

The term “birther” was coined in the early years of the Obama regime to marginalize and ridicule anyone questioning Obama’s claimed birth in Hawaii and other elements of his life story.

Cold Case Posse lead investigator Michael Zullo has said that the investigation, which remains ongoing, has found no evidence that Obama was ever in Hawaii prior to the age of two. One life narrative written by the Associated Press states that Obama was taken to Indonesia by his mother at the age of two, while others say that he went overseas at the age of six.

According to the AP in a 1990 article featuring Obama as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review, Obama’s claimed father is reported to have attended Oxford in the UK and Harvard in Cambridge, Massachusetts, while other narratives say that Obama Sr. was a student at the University of Hawaii, where he met Obama’s purported mother, Stanley and Dunham, and then went to Harvard.

The AP has not responded to The Post & Email’s questioning of the discrepancy.

In his White House biography, Obama does not name either of his parents.

In a broadcast several years ago, O’Reilly attempted to explain Obama’s purported Social Security number which appears to have been issued from the state of Connecticut by stating that because Obama’s father attended Harvard, he might have lived in Connecticut and applied for his son’s Social Security number from there. No evidence was presented to support that speculation.

Following the Cold Case Posse’s first press conference on March 1, 2012, Zullo stated that Fox News host Sean Hannity had booked him for an appearance that evening but canceled it at the last minute as a result of pressure from upper management.

Like O’Reilly, left-leaning media have worked diligently to protect Obama’s murky past from scrutiny and to utilize Saul Alinsky-type tactics to silence anyone citing the Cold Case Posse’s declarations of the forgery of government documents, which is a federal felony.

18 Responses to "Bill O’Reilly: Obama Angry at Trump Over “Birther” Issue"

  1. Cody Robert Judy   Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 11:46 PM

    Obama himself is proving the importance of Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. He is bound to the energy of deception and it’s rewards.

    NEW YORK POST SHOCKING REPORT OF OBAMA’S Domestic Terror Cover Up! Is Obama aiding and abetting with his ‘Lone Wolf’ narration-message to America? The facts to the answer- Yes! http://nypost.com/2016/06/18/why-the-lone-wolf-terrorist-is-a-myth/

    [Obama’s “rogue” homegrown Muslim terrorist is a myth. In virtually every case, the terrorist suspect’s radicalization spokes off into family, local mosques and the larger Muslim community. Family and friends knew they were radicalized. And in some cases, they even helped them pull off their evil plots. The shock and denials from relatives and clergy are for the most part for public consumption.] Cont..

    https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1209877692380345&id=510896692278452

    The Washington Times headlined an article yesterday,
    American-born children of immigrants proving fruitful recruiting ground for jihad in U.S.

    http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/13/second-generation-americans-proving-most-fruitful-/

    Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court has indulged itself in a full blown “discrimination of the poor” on the issue, with the only known bipartisan Federal Court Record in Obama and McCain being Pres. candidate Cody Robert Judy culminating in Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

    An arrest of the injustice goes high and deep in the Republican and Democratic Parties lust for power more than a desire for Justice.

    http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/06/turning-blind-eye-waking-up-to-danger.html?m=1

    In the wake of fulfilling standing is a most grievous injury the mainstream media has taken part in along with those citizens partisan to support principle over personality.

    U. S. Sen. RES 511 started this with the three main players in elections since 2008 .. John McCain, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama.

  2. Jeffrey Harrison   Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 3:02 PM

    1st. birther was Obama’s (Bio)promoting his book that
    was never actually written, go figure. This non written book
    was entitled Journeys in Black and White.

    The Acton & Dystel Promotional booklet, touted Obama as born in
    Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii, used the “born in Kenya”
    language ran from 1991 to (April) 2007. Then it was changed to
    Obama was born in Hawaii. And it stated “The son of a KENYAN
    finance minister”… At best, and highly unlikely, Obama’s
    fathers’ status disqualifies himself as a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
    and also for not being eligible of the office of POTUS.

    2nd. birthers were the Clintons at Hillary’s first run for
    president. Dr. Jerome Corsi wrote an article entitled:
    HOLLYWOOD PRODUCER HEARD BILL CLINTON SAY OBAMA INELIGIBLE.
    (see WND) Bettina Viviano had stated the Clintons were the
    original “birthers” and Bill was about to speak out but didn’t
    for threats against his daughter”.

    Other “birthers” who stated Obama was “Kenyan-born” are: Associated
    Press (AP), Kenya Sunday Standard, Kenya Standard, The Nigerian
    Observer, USAfrica, Newspage Weekly, AllAfrica.com, GraphicGhana.com,
    NPR, Michelle Obama, Mama Sarah, James Aggrey Orengo (Minister for
    Lands “Kenya), Dr. Khalwale (Kenyan National Assembly)…

    This “birther” movement wasn’t started by conservatives, or other
    such groups, the bread crumbs started with Obama, the Clintons,
    and the liberal media. Here is where the glass slipper fits.

  3. David Pickhardt   Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 9:10 PM

    actually, i have been paying attention and while the natural born citizen clause has been mentioned in passing in several decisions of the supreme court and some lower courts, the supreme court has never directly addressed the question of a specific presidential or vice-presidential candidate’s eligibility as a natural born citizen. bingham’s attempts were to permit the eligibility of kissinger to become president. that never happened but the mere fact it was not challenged does not make it constitutional.

    if the issue had in fact been clearly decided, all of the birther stuff would go away. why hasn’t it?

    congress can not change the constitution by definition. that would require amendment, or in the event of ambiguity, interpretation by the supreme court.

  4. Jeffrey Harrison   Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 3:22 PM

    Seriously, after nearly 2 1/2 centuries as a nation, lots of
    citizens are in limbo what a Natural Born Citizen is? Especially, elected officials included.

    Just as media should be held liable for false and misleading
    press, so too should our “elected officials” for poor proficiency,
    especially congress and the courts.

  5. ELmo   Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 1:30 PM

    If you had been paying attention, you would know that the Supreme Court has already spoken on the issue of “Natural Born Citizen” several times. The issue has also been raised and defined in Congress by John Bingham (the father of the Fourteenth Amendment) without challenge. There is no need for the Supreme Court to say more – it is now in the hands of the Executive Branch and if the Executive fails to
    “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” then it is up to the Legislative Branch to impeach and remove the fraud.
    ELmo

  6. David Pickhardt   Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 8:11 AM

    when i said:

    should they be stoned as apostolic?

    should have said stoned by the apostolic

  7. David Pickhardt   Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 7:18 AM

    yes, that is the job of the supreme court. judicial review. it is an absurd suggestion that they define every word in the dictionary or the colors of the rainbow. believe that is what is called a red herring and yes, there is an end as noted below:

    In retrospect, it is evident that constitutional interpretation and application were made necessary by the very nature of the Constitution. The Founding Fathers had wisely worded that document in rather general terms leaving it open to future elaboration to meet changing conditions. As Chief Justice Marshall noted in McCulloch v. Maryland, a constitution that attempted to detail every aspect of its own application “would partake of the prolixity of a legal code, and could scarcely be embraced by the human mind. . . . Its nature, therefore, requires that only its great outlines should be marked, its important objects designated, and the minor ingredients which compose those objects be deduced from the nature of the objects themselves.”

    it is in fact the job of the supreme court to rule on interpretation, not the wing nuts in the gallery.

    by your example, one could conclude that skin stretches a very long way if it were to say in the bible that moses tied his ass to a tree and walked forty miles. for anyone whose skin is not so pliable, should they be stoned as apostolic?

  8. Jeffrey Harrison   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 10:29 PM

    Really, we need the Supreme Court to make a ruling on what Natural Born Citizen is / means? Stop the planet, I’m getting off at the next stop.

    Where does it end? Saying is isn’t so, doesn’t make it so. Is it going to be that the Supreme Court will judge and define every word in the dictionary? Is the Supreme Court is to judge the colors in a rainbow?

    It’s plain awful, enough silly season. Parents, take control of the steering wheel. Funny, our founding fathers knew and wrote what NBC was, enough silly putty.

  9. ELmo   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 7:36 PM

    O’Reilly is as much a fraud as Obama. He asserted he had “seen the birth certificate” and then fell back to the two newspaper birth announcements; calling it ridiculous that someone would put such an announcement in the paper so their son could be President in thirty five years. Talk about “PINHEADS”…
    ELmo

  10. David Pickhardt   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 3:27 PM

    and what is your proof for the comment:

    it was the Saudis who paid for Barry’s Harvard education.

  11. bobbi A White   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 11:06 AM

    my understanding is that Fox itself threated that if any of their employees gave credibility to the birther issue, they would be terminated.
    Remember that Saudi Prince holds a controlling interest in Fox
    it was the Saudis who paid for Barry’s Harvard education.

  12. David Pickhardt   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 9:51 AM

    the constitution says:

    “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

    unless or until the supreme court actually decides the meaning of “natural born Citizen”, any discussion about the father’s birth status, the birth status of both parents, or rantings over where one might think someone was born are nothing more than meaningless opinions.

    a lot of people seem to have their hair on fire concerning strict adherence to the constitution yet provide their own interpretation to justify their argument. congress can not change the constitution, that has to be done by amendment. interpretation of the constitution is the job of the supreme court and with respect to the natural born citizen issue, they have been missing in action.

  13. Tim   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 2:53 AM

    Once again, the Post & Email is the only news source on the web that has been accurately reporting on this issue since its inception. I remember well when Bill O’Reilly was pretending to be an investigative reporter, when in truth he was either a paid shill or just another ignorant talking head with an ego. He wanted so badly to get the interview with obama to boost his ratings, that (I believe) he sold his soul to get it.

    “In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.” – – Mark Twain

    Keep up the damn fine work Sharon!

  14. Robert C. Laity   Friday, June 17, 2016 at 2:15 AM

    The definition of a Natural Born Citizen is one born in the US to two US citizen Parents. NO exceptions. O’Reilly and others on FOX news such as Sheppard Smith took no time in calling “Birthers” such things as “Pinheads” and “Crazy’. Fox news personnel are a guilty as many others in carrying water for Obama. Obama is a usurper,fraud,traitor and spy. There is no ‘President’ Obama: http://www.thepostemail.com/09/17/2010/there-is-no-president-obama. Currently, Laity v NY, Cruz,Rubio and Jindal, Docket # 1561-16, is making it’s way through the NY State Courts seeking their exclusion from being on any ballot for President, OR VP, in NY State

  15. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 11:26 PM

    Bill O’Reilly is a paycheck instead of a patriot.

    Bill O’Reilly profitably provided cover for Obama during all of The Soros-Pelosi-Obama Sedated Sedition 08-28-08- TODAY.

    http://canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm

    http://www.westernjournalism.com/an-open-letter-to-william-james-bill-oreilly-ii/

    Bill O’Reilly’s actions, when translated into English, indicate he selfishly decided to write about dead presidents for profit instead of prying off the cover-up-lid of a dangerous living lying muslim-insurgent presIDent, Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Obama II, for the benefit of some 320,000,000 American citizens.

    I suspect his former closet confidants, his ex-wife and kids, will agree with everything I’ve stated/studied herein!: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/mar/2/bill-oreilly-loses-custody-of-his-children/

  16. Loggia   Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:57 PM

    How could Bill say that “his people” had come to the conclusion that Obama was natural born when they had no way of even requesting to view the original B/C. Bill NEVER explained his adamant declaration making the viewers take it “ex cathedra” from his papal throne.

  17. Jeffrey Harrison   Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 5:28 PM

    Excellent summary. Hannity, Fox, and O’Reilly (“the inverse non
    spin zone”) know fully that Obummer is a fraud, fake, and phony.

    As noted in the above article Lt. Zullo had been scheduled to go
    on the Hannity Show and this could have blown “Barry” out of the
    water and revealed to the nation we have an USURPER in the White
    House. Hannity and Fox was complicit. They have blood on their
    hands…

    As a volunteer with Mr. Mike Volin of:
    http://www.wheresobamasbirthcertificate.com others and myself have gone
    to Congress and gave presentations of Sheriff Arpaio’s information
    and evidence. Most is not all Congress truly know Obummer a sham.
    They too know and have been mute and unresponsive.

    Citizens, I urge you not to just read articles, but to share this info with others. If you haven’t, contact your Congressmen on this issue. http://www.house.gov and http://www.senate.gov And get others to do the
    same.

  18. Dave Roth   Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 3:54 PM

    A child can tell its a forgery, if your not interested in the truth so be it but that doesn’t make your argument true. No documentation avail

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.