Atty. Mario Apuzzo Accepts Mark Levin’s “natural born Citizen” Challenge

RADIO HOST HAS CALLED ELIGIBILITY QUESTIONERS “STUPID”

by Sharon Rondeau

Radio host Mark Levin has said that he believes Sen. Ted Cruz is a “natural born Citizen’ because of his birth to a U.S.-citizen mother

(Feb. 29, 2016) — On Monday, constitutional eligibility activist Gary Wilmott reported that attorney, author and radio host Mark Levin stated on January 6, 2016 in regard to Cruz’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president:

I’m prepared to debate any so-called legal scholar, professor, serious commentator or candidate on this particular issue on the air. More than happy to do it. You see it’s not just the matter of just an opinion. You have to understand the Constitution, have to understand the nature of construction, you have to understand a little bit of American history. So that makes things complicated for liberals and knee-jerkers.  But I’m more than happy to debate this issue with anybody who says that an American citizen born of an American citizen mother wherever that citizen is born is not eligible as a natural citizen as a naturalized citizen to run for POTUS.

There is absolutely no authority for that.

I’m putting out a challenge right now on this program.

At issue is whether Cruz, who was born in Canada to a Cuban father, is a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution for the presidency.

On January 7, Breitbart News reproduced a statement released on Levin’s Facebook page in response to an article written by Breitbart’s John Nolte in which Nolte asked, “As “stupid” as this issue may be for Levin, do we want to litigate it in front of the American people today or three weeks before the general election, when Cruz is either our presidential or vice-presidential nominee? Because you have to be wearing blinders to believe that will not happen.”

Nolte’s speculation mirrored that of Ken Post, who contacted the Republican National Committee (RNC) more than a year ago to express his concerns that an ineligible individual might receive the nomination, be successfully challenged in court by the opposing party, and disqualified at a late date in the election cycle.

Levin’s response to Nolte’s article began, “Ah, now I get it. A stupid attack on Cruz’s citizenship helps Cruz because now the Democrats won’t use it should Cruz become the GOP nominee. And, we are told, this is not a settled legal issue so we need a federal court to resolve it as quickly as possible – or resolve it some other way. And, if you reject all this as a stupid political attack that distracts conservatives from real issues, you obviously are on the wrong side of a cultural divide. Now, I expect this kind of incoherence from liberals, but not from young, aspiring conservative writers.”

A journalist is not expected to be “conservative” or “liberal,” but rather, a finder and reporter of the truth without political bias.

Levin repeatedly used the word “stupid” to describe the debate over Cruz’s eligibility, calling it a “desperate birther tactic” several days later.

Beginning in 2008, questions about Obama’s eligibility were ignored by Congress, state attorneys general, governors, sheriffs, judges, the U.S. military, and secretaries of state asked to evaluate whether or not Obama’s name should appear on the 2012 ballot.  Obama claims a birth in Hawaii to a British-citizen father from Kenya who never became a U.S. citizen.

Cruz and others on his behalf have argued that the child of one U.S.-citizen parent is a “natural born Citizen,” regardless of where the child was born.  Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada to a U.S.-citizen mother and Cuban-citizen father, the latter of whom reportedly became a Canadian citizen in 1973.

Most Americans have generally understood the “natural born Citizen” requirement to mean “born in the country,” although in Cruz’s case, he cannot make that claim.  Because of his birthplace, Cruz was a Canadian citizen until May 2014, when he applied to renounce the citizenship.  The process was finalized the following month.

In response to Levin’s on-air offer to debate the “natural born Citizen” issue, on Monday Wilmott sent the following letter:

An enlarged version of the letter follows.

7 Responses to "Atty. Mario Apuzzo Accepts Mark Levin’s “natural born Citizen” Challenge"

  1. RoseC   Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 12:42 PM

    Levin will never take the challenge. I listened to him regularly at 6pm every night for 8 years. Two weeks ago I finally had to turn him off. Couldn’t stand it anymore. He was so in the tank for Cruz and claiming he could legally run. It was mind boggling to me b/c he is supposed to be a Constitutional scholar (?). He has lost my trust. I hope that others have turned him off as well. I can’t understand him at all. Cruz is a Manchurian Candidate. Don’t be fooled. He helped write the TPP and his wife is member of CFR and a Goldman Sachs honey. She also helped write the TPP and worked in the White House under Bush. They are both fake. We can not allow Cruz or Rubio to win this election. An HONEST man would not run for p or vp knowing they themselves are not eligible under our Constitution.

  2. Don Anthony Dillon   Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 1:51 AM

    My bottom dollar says Levin never bothers to reply to this letter.

  3. Rebecca johnson   Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 1:03 AM

    Both parents have to be American citizens for the child to be natural born.

  4. Bob   Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:55 PM

    Cruz received his citizenship as a result of an act of Congress. Congress is only empowered with powers of naturalization. Therefore, Cruz is naturalized. Both Wong v. Kim and Rogers v. Bellei support this. In particular, the Bellei case (which mirrors exactly Cruz’s birth circumstances) wouldn’t even exist if he had not been determined a naturalized citizen to begin with (otherwise, Congress couldn’t strip him of his citizenship).

  5. lawrence due   Monday, February 29, 2016 at 9:40 PM

    the 1790 law that ted cruz and mark levin cite has been REPEALED AND REPLACED. VATTELS Book law of nations states that one cannot be made a natural born citizen. https://www.facebook.com/notes/bruce-tanis/common-law-and-common-sense-of-tyrants-and-kings-and-natural-born-things/10153928143403035. also the 1934 immigration law ENDED ALL CITIZENSHIP FOR CHILDREN OF FOREIGN FATHERS. SECTION H. you should not need anything else to prove that cruz and his followers are liars or delusional or both. electing one illegal person is no reason to elect another.

  6. cfkerchner   Monday, February 29, 2016 at 8:40 PM

    The Framers’ Definition of a Natural Born Citizen Is Not Based on Race, Color, or Religion | by Atty Mario Apuzzo
    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-framers-definition-of-natural-born.html

    CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
    Lehigh Valley PA USA
    http://www.protectourliberty.org/
    http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.