Trump, Cruz, Rubio & Me

RESPONSE TO HARVARD LAW REVIEW ARTICLE ON PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY IN “TOP TEN DOWNLOAD LIST” AT SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH NETWORK

by Montgomery Blair Sibley, ©2016, blogging at Amo Probos

(Jan. 8, 2016) — Last May I wrote a short response to a Note in the Harvard Law Review which Note sought to legitimatize Messrs. Rubio/Cruz/Jindal as eligible to be President under Article II’s “natural born Citizen” requirement.  Predictably, the Harvard Law Review refused to print my retort.
The main stream media has been mocking anyone who seeks to raise the presently-unanswered-by-the-judiciary question: “What does the phrase ‘natural born Citizen‘ mean in Article II.”   Apparently, people are starting to take notice of my legal argument in this regard:  I received this today from the Social Sciences Research Network where my Response is filed and publicly available.

Your paper, “A RESPONSE TO THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW NOTE OF PAUL CLEMENT AND NEAL KATYAL: ‘ON THE MEANING OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'”, was recently listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list.  You may view the abstract athttp://ssrn.com/abstract=2700641

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.