RESPONSE TO HARVARD LAW REVIEW ARTICLE ON PRESIDENTIAL ELIGIBILITY IN “TOP TEN DOWNLOAD LIST” AT SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH NETWORK
by Montgomery Blair Sibley, ©2016, blogging at Amo Probos
(Jan. 8, 2016) — Last May I wrote a short response to a Note in the Harvard Law Review which Note sought to legitimatize Messrs. Rubio/Cruz/Jindal as eligible to be President under Article II’s “natural born Citizen” requirement. Predictably, the Harvard Law Review refused to print my retort.The main stream media has been mocking anyone who seeks to raise the presently-unanswered-by-the-judiciary question: “What does the phrase ‘natural born Citizen‘ mean in Article II.” Apparently, people are starting to take notice of my legal argument in this regard: I received this today from the Social Sciences Research Network where my Response is filed and publicly available.
Your paper, “A RESPONSE TO THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW NOTE OF PAUL CLEMENT AND NEAL KATYAL: ‘ON THE MEANING OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'”, was recently listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list. You may view the abstract at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=
2700641