If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
OBAMA CAMPAIGN STAFFER: “IS BARACK OBAMA A TERRORIST?”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Dec. 7, 2015) — On February 10, 2007, a relatively young, biracial politician serving his first term in the U.S. Senate from the state of Illinois declared himself a candidate for President of the United States in Springfield to cheering fans.
The man, known as “Barack Hussein Obama,” rolled out his campaign under the mantra of “Hope and Change.”
His Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, nearly 30 years Obama’s senior, termed him “a decent person” who voters had no reason to fear if he were elected in response to a voter’s concerns about Obama’s “cohort” relationship with former “domestic terrorists such as [Bill] Ayers.”
The voter had expressed concern over who Obama might choose for any U.S. Supreme Court vacancies and asked McCain how he would do so if elected.
McCain received boos for attempting to assure the crowd that Obama posed no threat if he were to win the White House.
A second concerned voter, a woman, said she had read about Obama’s background and determined that he was “an Arab.” “I can’t trust Obama,” she told McCain, who immediately contradicted her, contending that Obama was “a decent family man, citizen, that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues…and that’s what this campaign is all about.”
But is Obama an American “citizen,” or is he “a citizen of the world?”
Do we know where he came from?
In 2008, predominantly young voters reportedly from Ohio featured in a video which appears to have been produced by Obama’s campaign were labeled “extremely racist and ignorant” after telling the Obama campaign staffer that they believed Obama could be “a terrorist.”
In response to the interviewer’s questioning, one woman said, “You’re being deceived.” A man said, “I think he’s a communist.”
“If it’s so important, how come John McCain didn’t bring it up last night?” the Obama campaign staffer asked, referring to one of the presidential debates.
Later in the video stream, Obama supporters and critics clashed verbally, with some predicting that Obama would “take your weapons.” Some came close to a physical altercation over policy and military arguments.
Some expressed their clear belief that Obama is a Muslim, which Obama himself said in an interview with ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos in a 2008. Stephanopoulos quickly “corrected” Obama to say, “your Christian faith.”
For the last eight years, anyone disagreeing with Obama or questioning his background has been accused of being a “racist” and “intolerant.”
His regime has repeatedly attempted to make firearms more difficult to acquire, even by law-abiding Americans wishing to defend their families and homes against attack.
Today, many Americans are concerned about the vetting process for Syrian, North African and Middle-Eastern Muslims designated as “refugees” to be resettled in the United States.
But was Obama ever vetted?
When in 2008 Obama’s constitutional eligibility was questioned, neither Congress nor the courts would investigate. Instead, members of Congress hastened to assure their constituents that Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore was qualified to serve.
Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution states that the nation’s chief executive and commander-in-chief must be a “natural born Citizen.”
Obama has claimed an exotic history with a birth in Hawaii and four years in Indonesia, with visits to Kenya to visit family and his father’s grave. His first book, Dreams From My Father, describes a black Kenyan father who he barely knew and a white mother originally from Kansas briefly married to his father, divorced, and remarried to an Indonesian national who she also later divorced.
In his biography on the White House website, Obama does not identify his parents.
A number of constitutional scholars and attorneys have agreed that Obama’s eligibility to serve as president is not determined by where he was born, but rather, the citizenship of his parents, or at least his father, when he was born. Some believe that the Framers of the Constitution intended to disqualify anyone with foreign-citizen parents and therefore divided loyalties.
The U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen” and not simply “Citizen,” as suffices for members of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate.
Obama claimed eligibility for the presidency on his “FighttheSmears” campaign website under the 14th Amendment rather than Article II of the U.S. Constitution.
On or around June 12, 2008, Obama’s purported short-form birth certificate was posted on several websites, including FighttheSmears, although experts immediately remarked that it appeared to lack a raised seal or stamp.
Several analysts said the image was a forgery. Over the next several years, the image appeared in several different color schemes, with the White House officially posting it after releasing what it said was a certified copy of Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate on April 27, 2011, purportedly to prove his claimed birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961.
The Obama campaign downplayed Obama’s connections to Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, with Obama claiming that Ayers was “just a guy in the neighborhood.” Ayers, Dohrn and other members of the radical 1960s group “The Weather Underground” assembled and exploded bombs at the Pentagon, the U.S. Capitol, and New York City Police headquarters. The “Days of Rage” in which college students destroyed property to protest “racism” and Vietnam War began in the same city where Obama launched his political career a quarter-century later.
In 1995, Obama launched that career in the Ayers living room.
Ayers and his fellow Weather Underground members considered themselves “revolutionaries.”
Just days before the 2008 election, Obama promised to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.”
The reported “radicalism” infused into Chicago public schools by Obama and Ayers while they served on the board of directors of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge may be the driving force behind the Common Core Educational Standards imposed on unsuspecting states enticed with “Race to the Top” money beginning in 2011. The former superintendent of Chicago Public Schools, Arne Duncan, has been Obama’s Education Department Secretary for both of Obama’s terms.
Duncan’s biography states that “During Duncan’s tenure, the Department has launched a comprehensive effort to transform the teaching profession.”
The Annenberg money was used to teach “social justice” through the Coalition of Essential Schools based on “progressive” educators John Dewey, Paulo Freire, and Theodore Sizer. Ayers has written extensively on the topic. Ayers himself said publicly that Obama cannot effect “change” as well as members of communities who take leadership positions.
Common Core has been reported to contain “indoctrination” for first-graders. In September 2013, one analyst described “signs that government schools are pushing their progressive ideology down the throats of our children. In Skoke, Ill., fourth-grade classes were taught on work sheet lessons that government is equal to the family, according to the lesson. It sets the rules and takes care of people’s needs such as food, education and health. There have been other schools using students to sing the praise of our current president, preaching acceptance of previously perverted behavior and reciting collectivist slogans to convince students that government exists to take care of them.”
Linda Darling-Hammond, a key architect of Common Core, has connections to Ayers and Columbia College, from which Obama reportedly graduated in 1983 but where no one remembers him.
On September 2, 2008, a writer at The New York Sun wrote:
Senator Obama’s life story, from his humble roots, to his rise to Harvard Law School, to his passion as a community organizer in Chicago, has been at the center of his presidential campaign. But one chapter of the tale remains a blank — his education at Columbia College, a place he rarely speaks about and where few people seem to remember him.
Contributing to the mystery is the fact that nobody knows just how well Mr. Obama, unlike Senator McCain and most other major candidates for the past two elections, performed as a student.
The Obama campaign has refused to release his college transcript, despite an academic career that led him to Harvard Law School and, later, to a lecturing position at the University of Chicago. The shroud surrounding his experience at Columbia contrasts with that of other major party nominees since 2000, all whom have eventually released information about their college performance or seen it leaked to the public.
Obama has “revolutionized” education, health care, and the way in which the federal government functions. With executive orders and executive actions, Obama has dictated new “policy” without action from Congress.
Shareholders in the Chrysler Corporation have lost their investments with no recourse; political bundlers unqualified for such positions have been rewarded with ambassadorships; poorly-managed “green energy” company executives have been richly rewarded by Obama with taxpayer money before declaring bankruptcy; members of Congress have been spied upon and possibly blackmailed; and Obama’s “Justice Department” has refused to prosecute black criminals.
Obama’s rhetoric extols the belief system of Black Liberation Theology, the Black Panthers, and Malcolm X.
One of Obama’s first phone calls after his inauguration was made to Mahmoud Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority. His first major trip overseas was to assure Muslims around the world that the U.S. was not “at war” with Islam.
He entered into an agreement with Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism, American hostage-taker and developer of nuclear weapons intended to destroy Israel and other Western countries.
Obama has repeated that Islam is not the enemy throughout his occupation of the White House, including after 14 people were killed by radical Islamists last week in California. “Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that,” Obama said, while warning Americans about “divisiveness” and “letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam.”
Despite repeated terrorist attacks on U.S. soil under his watch, he continues to bring in Middle Eastern “refugees” which even his FBI director maintains cannot be fully vetted. Obama’s attorney general and Department of Homeland Security Secretary have apologized to Muslims since the California attack and threatened criminal prosecution of those speaking out against the danger of radical Islam.
The wife of the terrorist couple behind the attack in San Bernardino, CA was reportedly from Pakistan, spent time in Saudi Arabia, and was allowed into the country on a “fiancee visa” by Obama’s State Department. Months later, she and her husband carried out their attack which may have been funded by overseas terrorist connections despite Obama’s characterization of them as “lone wolves.”
While Obama’s NSA was collecting Americans’ phone records based on the claim that the activity assisted in foiling terror plots, the Boston Marathon bombers killed three and maimed hundreds; the Ft. Hood shooter killed 13 and an unborn child and wounded dozens more after collaborating with a known terrorist overseas; and men of Somali and other Middle Eastern origins have plotted to join ISIS and kill Americans, including Obama himself.
As this article was prepared for publication, “The Factor” host Bill O’Reilly, who falsely vouched for Obama’s purported Connecticut Social Security number, short-form birth certificate, and long-form birth certificate over the years, stated, “We are losing the war on terror.”
Various media commentators and writers are now questioning what they are seeing as Obama defends Islam again and again despite its violence and barbarism against Christians, Jews, Yazidis, and other religious groups.
During his Oval Office speech on Sunday evening intended to assuage Americans’ rising fears of Islamic terrorism, Obama referred to the audience as “My fellow Americans,” but it is unknown if he himself is an American.
Because like the Syrian “refugees,” he has no documentation.
In the U.S. today, an individual needs government-issued identification to apply for a job, open a bank account, or to obtain a driver’s license. A license with photo ID is required to cash a check or rent a post office box. However, Obama occupies the highest political office in the land without a verified birth certificate, Social Security card, U.S. passport, birth certificate, or Selective Service registration form.
On his show on Monday evening, O’Reilly appeared to be bewildered at Obama’s current behavior. But O’Reilly has facilitated that behavior by obscuring the truth about the man who calls himself “president,” as has all of the major media for the last eight years.
Other mainstream media are beginning to question Obama’s “refusal” to use the term “Islamic terrorism.”
The media is well aware that the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse determined early in 2012 that Obama’s long-form “birth certificate” and Selective Service registration form are fraudulent. Instead of launching their own investigations into the findings, media outlets attacked the messengers, Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and posse lead investigator Mike Zullo.
Members of Congress criticize Obama’s “policies” without pursuing the root of the problem: that he has no documentation and that his life story contains unexplained gaps which only generate further questions.
A 2012 biography of Obama written by David Maraniss described a “composite girlfriend” who may never have existed.
Zullo has termed Obama’s “Dreams” as a book about a “life that was never lived.”
Questions about Obama’s purported attendance at Columbia University led to a representative from the National Student Clearinghouse stating to WND in 2012 that two records had mistakenly existed for Obama showing that he attended Columbia for one and two years, respectively, thereby allegedly explaining the “missing year” in his transcripts.
Wayne Allyn Root, 1983 Columbia graduate in the same field of study as Obama, has stated on multiple occasions that no one who should have known Obama at the college recalls his having attended. On his blog in 2012, Root wrote:
According to Zullo, Obama has “dead spots” in his background, including a “gap in the [Columbia] transcripts.” “You can trace things back only so far,” Zullo said. “There is very limited human contact and no plethora of people who know him.”
What, then, is Obama’s true history?
Obama has reportedly brought in tens of thousands of Muslims after destabilizing Libya, Syria, Egypt and other Middle Eastern nations during the “Arab Spring” of 2011.
Obama stated in his book that since the 9/11 attacks on U.S. soil, he is concerned about Muslims’ “sense of security and belonging.”
“They have been reminded that the history of immigration in this country has a dark underbelly; they need specific assurances that their citizenship really means something, that America has learned the right lessons from the Japanese internments during World War II, and that I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction,” Obama said.
But what citizenship does he hold? What religion? What goals does he harbor for America?
Who is he?
At a climate change conference in Paris on the same day as the California terrorist attack, Obama said that “the threats to U.S. and global security from climate change are already ‘akin’ to an Islamic State terrorist attack.”
With his strong defense of Islam and inclusion of potentially radical Islamists in his regime, is he, in fact, a supporter of terrorism while pretending to fight it?
While filibustering the nomination of John Brennan for CIA director, Sen. Rand Paul said of the election of Adolf Hitler in 1933, “It was a chaotic situation. Out of that chaos, Hitler was elected democratically. They elected him out of this chaos. The point isn’t that anybody in our country is Hitler. I’m not accusing anybody of being that evil. I think it’s an overplayed and misused analogy. But what I am saying is that in a democracy, you could someday elect someone who is very evil. That’s why we don’t give the power to the government. And it’s not an accusation of this president or anybody in this body. It’s a point to be made that occasionally even a democracy gets it wrong.”