Exclusive: USCIS Denies FOIA Request for Ted Cruz’s Naturalization Papers, If They Exist

“CONSENT MUST BE PROVIDED BY SENATOR CRUZ…”

by Sharon Rondeau

USCIS is a division of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

(Apr. 11, 2015) — On March 23, 2015, Sen. Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz declared his candidacy for the U.S. presidency in 2016. On the same day, his political committee, Cruz for President, filed an official Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Elections Commission (FEC).

Cruz was born on December 22, 1970 in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. His mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born an American citizen, and his father, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, was born a citizen of Cuba.

In an interview with NPR in June 2013, Rafael Bienvenido Cruz stated that while he and his wife were working in the Canadian oil industry, he became a Canadian citizen. It has been suggested, but not yet been verified, that his wife also became a Canadian citizen during that time.  Speculation also exists that Eleanor may have maintained her U.S. citizenship while in Canada but applied for and received Canadian citizenship, rendering her a dual US-Canadian citizen.

Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution mandates that the president and Commander-In-Chief be a “natural born Citizen.” Extensive research shows that the term of art included by the Founders at the insistence of John Jay referred to two generations of United States citizens. The section’s “grandfather clause,” stated as “or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution,” exempted the Founders themselves from the “natural born” mandate, allowing any one of them to serve as president since they had fought in the American Revolution against Great Britain.

The Founders were known to have relied heavily upon the treatise on international relations titled “The Law of Nations,” written by Swiss jurist Emmerich de Vattel. In Book I, Chapter 1, Section 212, Vattel wrote:

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

According to the Encylopaedia Britannica, The Law of Nations “was especially influential in the United States because his principles of liberty and equality coincided with the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence.”

Vattel’s work was quoted by George D. Collins writing for The American Law Review in 1884.

On the day Cruz declared his candidacy, left-leaning TIME Magazine wrote that “Though it’s a common misconception, being born in Canada does not necessarily exclude Cruz, the child of an American citizen, from the White House. In fact, he’s one of many potential presidents over the years who have been born abroad.”

TIME made the argument that the 1790 Naturalization Act of Congress addressed the citizenship of children born in foreign countries to U.S.-citizen parents or fathers.  The article further cites “born-abroad politicians” who did not seek the presidency and therefore were not required to meet the qualification of “natural born Citizen.”

The TIME article raises the question of the presidential eligibility of Chester A. Arthur in relating that he might have been born outside of the United States.  However, research performed by former attorney Leo Donofrio indicates that Arthur’s eligibility problem arose from his father’s lack of U.S. citizenship when Chester Arthur was born, a fact Arthur apparently attempted to conceal by burning the family Bible containing the records just before his death.

Some of the Founders, such as George Washington, were born on U.S. soil to British-citizen parents, while some were born in other British colonies.  While many people today argue that a simple birth within the United States suffices as “natural born,” the clause would not have been invoked in the Constitution were that the case in the Founders’ view.

When many of the Framers, such as James Madison, were born in the colonies, their parents were considered British citizens even if they, too, had been born within the American colonies.

A biography of Madison states that Barack Obama is a descendant of Madison’s wife, Dolley.

In a lengthy essay written in 1916 by Missouri attorney and later Assistant Secretary of State Breckenridge Long, a natural born Citizen was described as a person born in the United States to a U.S.-citizen father. Long contended that Charles Evans Hughes, who ran against Pres. Woodrow Wilson in 1916, was ineligible to seek the presidency because at the time of his birth, his father was not a naturalized U.S. citizen.

Long differentiated between “native born” and “natural born” when he wrote:

The Constitution of the United States puts a particular qualification upon those who shall become President and Vice-President. For all other offices it requires that they be “citizens of the United States,” but for the Presidency and Vice-Presidency it requires that they be “Natural Born citizens.” The word “natural” means “of the nature of”; “naturally a part of”; “by the laws of nature an integral part of” a system. Following that line of thought, a“natural born” citizen would be one who was naturally, at his birth, a member of the political society; naturally, a part of the political system into which he was born; by the laws of nature a citizen of the society into which he was born. It would mean, further, that no other government had any claim upon him; that his sole allegiance was to the government into which he had been born and that that government was solely, at the time, responsible for his protection. “Native born” does not mean quite the same thing. He might be born in a country under conditions similar to the conditions under which Mr.Hughes was born, and subsequently become a citizen of that Country. In that case, after he became a citizen, he would be a “native born” citizen, but he would not have been a “natural born” citizen. From the instant of his birththis government would not be solely responsible for his protection.

An opinion piece published in The Harvard Law Review the week prior to Cruz’s announcement claimed that Cruz is a natural born Citizen by virtue of his birth to one U.S.-citizen parent, regardless of his place of birth.

In 2008, members of Congress and Obama supporters claimed that Obama’s purported birth in Hawaii on August 4, 1961 to a U.S.-citizen mother was enough to qualify him as a natural born Citizen.

Obama’s father was a citizen of Great Britain, and later, Kenya, when Kenya achieved its independence from Great Britain in December 1963.  The new Kenyan Constitution, ratified by the voters on August 4, 2010, extends to anyone with one parent possessing Kenyan citizenship a Kenyan citizen him- or herself, which includes Obama if his life narrative is accurate.

Following Cruz’s presidential announcement, The Post & Email submitted a number of requests under the 1996 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to various federal agencies to determine whether or not Cruz was registered at birth as a United States citizen, later naturalized as a U.S. citizen, and whether or not he declared himself a U.S. citizen on any required federal applications.

A Public Information Act request made to the state of Texas last fall for Cruz’s applications for the post of state Solicitor General revealed that he was not asked whether or not he possessed U.S. citizenship.  In August 2013, Cruz appeared to learn through an article at The Dallas Morning News that he had been a Canadian citizen his entire life by virtue of his physical birth in that country.

The voters of Texas were therefore not informed during Cruz’s 2012 U.S. Senate race that possessed Canadian citizenship.

Two separate reports unconfirmed by The Post & Email indicate that Cruz has previously acknowledged that he is not a “natural born Citizen.”

For 20 months ending in February 2003, Cruz served as Director of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission in Washington, DC. After The Post & Email submitted a FOIA request to the FTC for documents Cruz had signed, agency attorney Anna Murray directed us to 116 pages of documents released in response to a similar request made by a private individual last November.

In the documents, Cruz identified himself as “R. Ted Cruz” or “Ted Cruz.”

The Post & Email has followed up with Ms. Murray to determine if additional documents are available.

On March 24, 2015, The Post & Email requested of the U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Service (USCIS) the “naturalization record, if it exists, of Rafael Edward ‘Ted’ Cruz, a declared presidential candidate with no further presumption of privacy.”

On April 10, 2015, we received the following response:

An article written by a contributor to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press (RCFP) during the 2012 presidential campaign reported that while personal information is often withheld from FOIA request responses on public figures, “mounting public interest has suggested that transparency and ethics regulations monitoring candidates running for public office should perhaps take into account certain personal records in their capacity to affect official government business.”

Writer Amanda Simmons began her article with:

In 2004, Jack Ryan, a successful investment banker, was the Republican nominee in a close race for a U.S. Senate seat in Illinois, when two Chicago news media organizations successfully argued for the public disclosure of his previously sealed divorce records. Ryan opposed the records’ release and the ensuing revelation of a salacious sex scandal with his ex-wife derailed his campaign, paving the way for his opponent, a little-known Democrat from the Illinois State Senate, to win the November election by a landslide.

His name was Barack Obama.

Years later, as president, Obama of course became embattled with a private records controversy of his own, when Donald Trump and other supporters of the ‘birther’ movement pressured him to release his long-form birth certificate to prove that he was born in the United States and is qualified for the presidency. Leading up to Obama’s securing of the Democratic party’s nomination for reelection in April, obstinate skeptics filed lawsuits in 13 states challenging his eligibility to be listed on the primary ballots unless he showed more proof of his natural-born U.S. citizenship.

6 Responses to "Exclusive: USCIS Denies FOIA Request for Ted Cruz’s Naturalization Papers, If They Exist"

  1. Robert Laity   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 2:29 PM

    Foxes don’t “Hoot”. Wise old owls Hoot. The owls are still out there “giv[ing] a hoot”.

  2. Robert Laity   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 2:24 PM

    Ted Cruz is NOT a Natural-Born American Citizen. Even if American Citizenship follows from an American Father, the definition of an NBC requires that one’s Mother also be American and that Birth in the United States is mandatory. Cruz is ineligible is so many ways.

  3. gigclick   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 1:19 PM

    Was “consent” provided by Obama and DNC members? Cruz AND Rubio are NOT Article 2 legal to be POTUS! RNC ignorance of their eligibility may eclipse Obama’s illegal status as a “dual citizen” which Biden and Pelosi falsified in 2008 on DNC vetting papers we have had copies of for nearly 7 years. Few listened when 300 members of American Grand Jury Online studied DNC corruption-the Constitution and serving Criminal Presentments which were served for over 1.5 years with all courts illegally blocking all Criminal Presentments-that is when we all realized there was much more to what was going on and that political manipulation and corruption was much deeper than we could imagine. Further investigation has led to extreme amounts of channels of bottomless corruption and manipulation of law to allow the corruption to run freely including being aided by corrupted Judges in violation of their sworn oaths committing and allowing Misprision Of Felony at all levels from county to federal which has been proven over and over until we are sick to our stomachs from the quantity of DNC and some RNC members working together for America’s ruin and their gains-politically and financially at the public’s expense. Total corruption from top to bottom including illegal arrest and falsely charged imprisonment to keep 6 Veterans and other whistle blowers mouths shut while controlling all press/media that would expose their prosecution and indictments. There are so many people involved, we may never know the depth of corruption including members of the judicial and senate/congress that have also ignored and enabled that full scale operations that have run full blast for 7 years with vicious cover ups and lies at all levels while an illegal POTUS and crew spit out illegal laws that were never voted on legally or passed with public approval. It is out of control with no means to stop them other than old laws that may never be exercised due to current red tape and professional excuses that have no bottom. Meanwhile, the disenfranchisement, national debt, internal military cuts, weakend foreign policy, 95 million people underemployed or unemployed are killing America with dole costs, $160 billion being spent on “illegal alien” costs, higher costs of living spiraling out of control and unaffordable unsustainable costs at every turn and corner, medical costs out of control. What will be the end result? We are approaching that result and yet unable to do anything about any of this and the beat goes on for the DNC while we see America in collapse and looking at few promising candidates from the RNC that will have answers of cures for the damage that has been allowed for nearly 8 years of an illegal POTUS and fully corrupt DNC that is out of control. Will more pretense fix it?

  4. ss442   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 1:17 AM

    By the way, since when did the DHS take over FOIA requests? Since Obama placed the Obama filter in front of FOIA requests?

  5. ss442   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 1:13 AM

    I told my Congressman Michael Burgess that there was going to be a fight regarding Cruz’s ineligibility via his Canadian citizenship and his failure to disclose that when running for senate. If he did, I never heard about it and certainly would not consent to his running for president.

    Let the process begin for the truth. This might perhaps be the shovel that uncovers the lies in the Obama camp.

  6. OPOVV   Sunday, April 12, 2015 at 12:36 AM

    The Owls saw the fields below them, and each field was its own domain because of a fence, gully, stream, road or maybe it was just a row of telephone poles.
    Here’s the deal: Foxes could only hunt in the field that they were born in. No exceptions. Also, the Fox’s mother and father had to be also born in the same field. That’s them rules. It was even written down in a document and all the Foxes thought that was a fair. Over 200 years of acceptance.
    Then all hell broke loose by a Black Fox crossing a border and hunting where he wasn’t supposed to.
    The Owls waited for the Foxes to get upset and not allow the intruder Fox to hunt in their field, but the Black Fox just ignored all the other Foxes and then it came to pass that all the other Foxes in all the other fields just said “The hell with it” and then any Fox anywhere could vote and hold public office, even become president and the heck with the previous rules, regulations and that 200+ year document that no longer had any meaning.
    Really now, does any Fox think that the Fox named Ted Cruz gives a hoot?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.