AND WHAT SHOULD IT SAY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Jan. 13, 2015) — On Tuesday evening, Rep. Jim Bridinstine (R-OK1) issued a series of tweets regarding new legislation he has proposed, a vote scheduled to take place in the House of Representatives on Wednesday on appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and another less specific tweet which said, “The Republican majorities in the 114th Congress must send a message to Pres. Obama and the world.”
On November 4, voters elected enough Republicans to the U.S. Senate to form the first majority since 2006, and Republicans gained seats over their existing majority in the House.
Bridinstine advocates a refusal to provide funding for Obama’s “executive amnesty,” declared by Obama on November 20 to be within his constitutional authority despite having said the opposite since 2008. During his declaration, Obama said that he was granting a reprieve to illegal aliens with relatives accepted into his 2012 “DACA” program, which granted deportation relief for approximately 600,000 young illegals brought into the country by their parents when they were children.
Boehner reportedly now opposes “amnesty” and, according to The Washington Times, “will pass a bill through the House canceling President Obama’s deportation amnesty and boosting pro-enforcement policies.”
Bridinstine also supported the replacement of Speaker of the House John Boehner last week along with approximately 24 others.
In response to the last tweet, The Post & Email responded, “Yes, Obama’s documents are forgeries! http://mcsoccp.org/joomla/ ,” referring to the investigation conducted by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse which concluded that Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form are “computer-generated forgeries.”
The posse’s investigation began in September 2011 after a group of Tea Party members approached Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio with concerns that reports of fraud and forgery stemming from the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House in April of that year would disenfranchise their votes in the upcoming 2012 presidential election.
In a brief press conference during which Obama attempted to minimize the widespread speculation that he was not born in Hawaii as stated in his biography, Obama claimed the image as an accurate representation of his birth certificate allegedly held by the Hawaii Department of Health.
While Obama stated that he was born in “Kapiolani Hospital,” no spokesman there will confirm the claim.
Arpaio agreed to delegate his Cold Case Posse to examine the image, believing that an examination would quickly “clear the president.” After several days, however, the posse found that the image could not have originated with a paper document.
In the first of two press conferences on March 1, 2012, CCP lead investigator Mike Zullo and Arpaio stated that the investigation to that date had gathered clues about the uploading of the fraudulent image to the White House website on April 27, 2011 and determined that both Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service form were poorly-crafted forgeries.
At the second presser on July 17, 2012, Arpaio and Zullo revealed some of the evidence which led them to reach their conclusions and called upon Congress to investigate those findings.
Congress took no action, and the FBI deferred to Congress when questioned by The Post & Email on July 18, 2012.
In recent months, Zullo stated that Arpaio’s office now knows the identification of the forger.
At an unannounced time, Arpaio launched a second investigation focusing on matters stemming from, but not including, the birth certificate issue.
According to Zullo, Boehner has stonewalled consideration of the forgeries which the regime presented to an unsuspecting public. Former Rep. Steve Stockman had promised to publicize the issue but reneged on that promise before leaving office earlier this month, having not sought re-election in November.

Congress should stop funding Obama’s vacations and golf trips. That might actually do some good. If he ever gets convicted, will he have to refund the money?