What “Stand-Down Order?”

WAS THE BENGHAZI ATTACK THE RESULT OF ILLEGAL ORDERS?

by OPOVV, ©2014

(May 23, 2014) — So they already had 18 Benghazi hearings: “Thank you for anointing our lowly hearing with your exalted presence, Hillary. And thank you, and I think that I’m now speaking for all of the committee members on this, for your accomplishments.”

Ho-hum. So the Red Cross packed up and left, you say. Next question.

Ho-hum. The British left town, too. But, if Muammar Gaddafi was such a bad guy — the Red Cross was safe under his rule; so, too, were the British, and yet both of them thought, since Gaddafi’s ouster (overthrow), it became no longer safe for them. Am I hearing this right, because it makes absolutely no sense. During Gaddafi: safe; after Gaddafi: unsafe. What have we done, made Libya a lot more unsafe for everyone, that is, if one is not part of the Muslim Brotherhood? Shades of Egypt? Some foreign policy, Hillary.

Ho-hum. Now tell us something we don’t know, such as who gave the stand-down order? And then, if you would, please, walk that “stand-down order” down  the chain of command, from Hillary’s phone or Valerie Jarrett’s phone, or maybe Obama gave the order and it was passed along by word of mouth; maybe it was faxed; emailed; maybe it was by word of mouth, maybe Jarrett said to “Let them all die.” You see, we don’t know, but we’d like to know, if that’s okay with Pelosi and all the other “Fact Deniers.”

And then, we all want to know the why of it all, all the “whys:”

1. Who gave the order not to “lift a finger?”

2. How did the order originate?

3. Why were Americans at that place at that time?

4. How did that order go DOWN the chain of command, for, surely, somewhere, someone said, “Let ’em burn.”

And that’s exactly what happened, wasn’t it? Our troops followed illegal orders from a de facto Commander-in-Chief and we lost four guys who didn’t have to die that night.

That’s it.

From one inquisitive citizen,

OPOVV