If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
FROM THOSE WHO PROVIDED THE EVIDENCE
by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 22, 2014) — Last week, The Post & Email followed up on a report by Randy Foreman of NewsBlaze that two congressmen who were provided Sheriff’s Kits by volunteers last November containing a presentation by a criminal investigator into the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form were “not following the issue at all.”
Foreman had interviewed Reps. Tim Huelskamp and Raul Labrador at a function sponsored by The Heritage Foundation on an unspecified date and asked them about the “birth certificate” question, referring to the reported forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate, which has been posted on the White House website since April 27, 2011.
In September of that year, a criminal investigation was launched by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse into the authenticity of the image. Originally intending to “clear the president” by proving that the image was, in fact, a scanned version of a certified copy of Obama’s birth record from Hawaii, the posse found, after thousands of tests and interviews with experts, that it was a “computer-generated forgery.”
Following the publication of Foreman’s article, The Post & Email was informed by Mike Volin, founder of WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com that both congressmen had been provided Sheriff’s Kits by volunteers in November. The kits, produced by Volin at his own expense outside of donations, contain a presentation by Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo of how the conclusion of forgery was reached in regard to Obama’s identity documents.
The Post & Email then contacted staffers of the two representatives to inquire if the Sheriff’s Kits had been given to them by their aides. With the exception of two short, contradictory statements made by a Huelskamp staffer, there was no response despite numerous phone calls and emails sent to staffers who promised to “see what’s going on.”
In response, Jeff Harrison, who was one of a team of two individuals distributing the kits last November to include Huelskamp and Labrador’s offices, told The Post & Email:
Last weekend, I sent both Labrador and Huelskamp’s Washington’s D.C. office and one of their local offices a fax letting them know that Tom and I visited their office.
My reaction to their lack of action is disappointment. Especially when a citizen such as me who is a common person makes many attempts to contact them about major fraud and an attack on our Constitutional Republic. The American People have been duped and our elected officials swore an oath to the beloved Constitution. Their silence and extreme lack action says something. They are for sale and spineless. I am not for sale. And I will not let this evil continue. I know one thing, evil only destroys itself. As a Sergeant in the United States Marines I swore an oath to the Constitution and it did not end when I was Honorably Discharged. These officials were rude not to have replied after many of us contacted them many times. We spent our own funds and time to educate them and went all the way to Washington, D.C. and we were shunned. I like many other veterans volunteered and served in combat putting our lives on hold and at risk. The least our elected officials can do is examine the evidence and follow the truth. And take action.
Harrison has also twice visited the Washington, DC office of his congressman, Rep. Glenn Thompson, to deliver a copy of an affidavit sworn to by Zullo and included in a civil case in Alabama whose decision was announced on Friday.
Harrison has also appeared on WCED talk radio several times and has two more appearances scheduled on March 31 and April 7, respectively, to discuss the Obama fraud and forgery matter.
Of his visits to Thompson’s office, Harrison told us:
On 09/10/2013 just before noon as I was at Glenn Thompson’s Washington’s office door, he opened the door and was stepping out his door to the hallway. I was within feet of him. He recognized me from the Tea Party I belong to. I lifted a white notebook and said I had an Affidavit to give him. He said give it to the ladies in the office. I went in and gave a several minute presentation to Nancy Billet, and left the first Affidavit to her.
On 11/18/2013 I went to the Washington office again, but this time I was with Tom Pavich of California and spoke with Darrell Owens. Again I gave a brief presentation and left a 2nd. Affidavit.
Additionally, Harrison told us:
I gave a several minute presentation to Rep. Glenn Thompson on 01/20/2014 in person at the Radio Station WCED at about 8:45 am. I went there to drop off a notebook of Lt. Zullo’s Affidavit and related items to Beth Walters. Rep. Thompson did not respond much but with a few words. I did ask him if he actually received the Affidavit that I delivered to his office. He did acknowledge that he did receive it. At the talk I gave him I said there was a problem with Obamas birth certificate, Selective Service Card, and Social Security Card. As a postal worker (Custodian) I explained the item of the date stamp.
At no time did Rep. Glenn Thompson respond or reply to my additional written letters or phone calls. On 01/30/2014 I finally got a hold of Darrel Owens and asked him if Rep. Thompson was going to do anything about the information I had supplied. He said that they were not interested in taking any action. I asked him why and would they send me a letter? There was no reply.
Harrison has been working with Volin, who produced the sheriff’s kits en masse and has sent out thousands to concerned citizens who are presenting them to local media outlets, friends, family, neighbors, and local law enforcement entities.
The Post & Email interviewed Harrison in late December about a flyer he had designed and distributed door-to-door in his neighborhood to inform people about the forgery of Obama’s birth certificate and Selective Service form, which Congress to date has not been willing to scrutinize or investigate.
In addition to visiting his congressman twice, traveling to Washington with other volunteers in November, distributing flyers, doing radio shows, and working full-time, Harrison sent copies of the Sheriff’s Kit by mail to nine congressmen, including Speaker of the House John Beohner and Majority Whip Eric Cantor.
Last August, Harrison personally spoke with Pennsylvania U.S. Senator Pat Toomey about the forgeries, describing his encounters thusly:
“On 08/28/2013 starting at about 3:00 pm Sen. Patrick Toomey attended a Town Hall meeting at VFW Post 813 located in PA 15801. This meeting lasted for about 2 hours.
“Before Sen. Toomey spoke he asked if he could sit next to me before he spoke. I said that no one was sitting at the empty seat, and sure, sit down. As he sat next to me I stated to him that after he spoke I had my binder to give to him. This contained Lt. Zullo’s Affidavit.
“After Sen. Toomey spoke I got up and briefly presented my white binder of the Affidavit. I informed him that it was about Obama credentials. He took the binder and carried it around with himself as he spoke to other citizens. In the binder I had my address information.
“On 08/30/2013 at about 2:00 pm I had had a scheduled appointment with his staff member Mr. John Frick at Sen. Toomey’s Johnstown, PA office. I was there with Mr. David Noll of the Tea Party from that area. Our meeting lasted for over two hours. We talked about several items. I attended this meeting also because it had been scheduled and the meeting of 08/28 had come up on a notice of just a few days, and I thought, “why not”.
“This meeting was also attended by another Tea Party member of that area, but I forgot his name. At the ending of our meeting in front of all of us I presented Lt. Zullo’s Affidavit and stated I was requesting a Congressional Investigation of Obama. Mr. Frick took the Affidavit.
“On 11/19/2013 I and Tom Pavich went to Sen. Toomey’s Washington, D.C. office and I gave a brief presentation and gave a “sheriff Kit” to Jeremy Baker, Legislative Correspondent. (see picture at Mike’s web site / D.C. PRESENTATIONS.)
“I have made more calls and sent letters to Toomey’s office, but received no replies.”
Pavich also provided his reaction to The Post & Email on the lack of response by congressional staffers and the congressmen themselves on the evidence they were presented regarding the forgeries:
I am extremely disappointed that I traveled almost 3,000 miles to personally hand deliver a Sheriff’s kit to both Congressman Heulskamp and Labrador to find that the information never made it to the Congressmen. A matter of highest Constitutional importance has been tossed into the DC trash heap of irrelevance. Were we ignored because we were not occupants of K Street DC and rather occupants of Main St. USA? Shame on you Congressmen and your staffs.
All we want to know regarding the pResident’s forged documents is, “Who did it and Why did they do it?”
Despite Zullo’s two press conferences in 2012 declaring Obama’s identification documents fraudulent, the major media has reported virtually nothing of what could be the largest corruption scandal in the nation’s history. In December, U.S. News & World Report published an article on the subject, and Fox News’ “The Five” held a discussion on constitutional eligibility for the office of the president in August but did not raise the question of whether or not Obama was eligible or his documentation valid.
Obama’s presidential eligibility has been doubted by many as a result of news reports that say he was born in Indonesia or Kenya and the fact that Obama claims a father who was never a citizen of the United States. Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief of the military be a “natural born Citizen.”
Volin contends that “We’ve been sold out by the media” which have failed to report on the forgeries. Of his campaign to educate members of Congress about the forgeries and their lack of response, Volin told The Post & Email, “One of the reasons that I pushed to take pictures and get business cards of people who were there [in Washington, DC]…this can’t be buried under the rug. At one point, this is going to come out.. If they start running and grabbing at the Sheriff’s Kits…’I’ve had one, I’ve had one!’…Well, that’s fine, but what did you do with it?”
Zullo has reported that television executives and producers have stated that they feared for their jobs or their safety if they were to air anything on the Cold Case Posse’s findings.
On Friday, the Alabama Supreme Court announced its decision in the case of McInnish v. Chapman (Bennett), which contended that then-Secretary of State Beth Chapman had not performed her constitutional duty to properly vet presidential candidates prior to placing their names on the Alabama state ballot in 2012. Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore and Justice Tom Parker wrote lengthy dissenting opinions which will reportedly be used in pending cases filed by Atty. Orly Taitz.
While the court voted 7-2 that the Secretary of State does not possess the statutory authority to check candidates’ qualifications for the office they seek, one member of the majority, Justice Bolin, stated that “(Chief Justice Moore concluded in his dissenting opinion) that the Secretary of State has an affirmative duty to investigate the qualifications of a candidate for President of the United States of America before printing that candidate’s name on the general-election ballot in this State. Although logically the Secretary of State, being the chief elections official of the state,should be vested with such a duty, under our present constitutional and statutory framework addressing elections, including presidential elections, not only is that not the case, but the Secretary of State would be bereft of written authority for such an action and ill equipped from a practical standpoint to carry out such an important duty.”
On Friday, Zullo told Carl Gallups of PPSimmons News & Ministry that “It is clear that the argument here is the lack of statutory provision giving the Secretary of State the legal authority to conduct an investigation to verify the legitimacy of a presidential candidate to be placed on ballot of the respective states. There clearly is a lack of statutory authority and legal mechanism in place for a Secretary of State in any of the fifty states to conduct that type of investigation. This Alabama Supreme Court adjudication in no way reflects the question that is really at hand – the authenticity of the document provided to the public of proof- positive that Mr. Obama was in fact born on us soil thus fulfilling the ‘soil requirement’ to be eligible to hold the highest office in the land.”