If it Weren’t for Snowden

A PLAN FOR GOOD OR EVIL?

by OPOVV, ©2014

Edward Snowden was employed by a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) when he flew to Hong Kong in June and revealed that the NSA conducts extensive spying and surveillance on American citizens

(Jan. 29, 2014) — I didn’t know I was personally at war. It was news to me. But, apparently, I’ve been at war for years and nobody clued me in until Edward Snowden let the cat out of the bag. The government, our government, SURPRISE!, has been at war with us. We haven’t done anything wrong, so I put the pieces of the puzzle together and came up with the only possible conclusion: WE are the enemy.  THEY (the government) are at war with us, and we would never have known if it weren’t for Snowden’s whistle-blowing on the NSA.

But it doesn’t stop there, now does it? The IRS is also targeting us. Okay, so our Fourth Amendment rights are being violated numerous times each day. But why? Why is the government interested in us in the first place? We’re no threat to anyone, at least here at home. What gives?

Why would a government target its own people? One would think that the resources would be better spent targeting known enemies, but that is clearly not the case. The only logical conclusion that anyone can reach is that the government and the population are at opposite ends. It is the goal of this government to subject each citizen to a “Loyalty Test”: either you  are emphatically against the Constitution or you are the sworn enemy of the government; you are either anti-American or you are a target of the Gestapo; either you toe the official line or you are marked.

The really sad part about this whole takeover of the government is how easily it was done, thanks to the dimwits who are the employees of the Election Boards in our country. Just think of it: every State Secretary of State, every Federal, State, County, Parish, and township Election Board employee had to turn his back on the United States Constitution. And each of them did, every single one of them: TWICE, in 2008 and again in 2012, when it was far, far more obvious the Obama was NEVER Constitutionally ineligible.

And so we’re targeted. Do we want illegal immigrants in our country? No. Solution: deport them. Do we want Muslims within our borders? No. Solution: deport them. Do we want our troops to continue to be “Targets of Opportunity” for the Muslims in, well, anywhere, right? Ft. Hood, anyone?

So here’s the point: Congress hasn’t listened to one word from the voters ever since January 20, 2009, the day that Obama was sworn in by a Chief Justice that has hundreds of millions in the Vatican Slush Fund, if anyone’s been paying attention (pun intended).

There’s no conceivable reason why we’re the targets unless somebody, somewhere, somehow, has a plan for us. Is it a plan to shore up the Constitution, or is it a plan to replace the Constitution with Sharia Law? Is it a plan that will follow in the footsteps of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., or is it a plan designed to enslave? Is it, in short, a plan for good, or is it a plan with evil intent?

Obama’s private Army: the employees of the Federal Government. I’ve heard government employees say, “It’s above my pay grade” in reference to following illegal orders; orders from Obama, for instance. At the Nuremberg Trials, the answer “I was only following orders” or “That’s above my pay grade” was a sure ticket to visit the hangman, and I don’t see why it’s any different today.

As long as we are still able to abide by the Second Amendment, I suggest we do so as if the lives of our families depend upon what we do today. In order to plan for the future, we must first be victorious day by day. Make it happen. Protect yourself, your family and, above all, the Constitution, for if we lose our Constitution we’ve lost our country.

OPOVV.com

2 Responses to "If it Weren’t for Snowden"

  1. OPOVV   Wednesday, January 29, 2014 at 2:07 PM

    Yes, of course.
    Sometimes in the heat of battle things get turned-around very easily.
    Semper Fi,
    OPOVV

  2. slcraig   Wednesday, January 29, 2014 at 8:53 AM

    EDIT ALERT:

    I believe the last word of paragraph #4 should be “eligible” and reading ” …. “0bama was NEVER Constitutionally eligible…”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.