If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
BUT WHO IS GUILTY OF IT?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Sep. 27, 2013) — While speaking to students at a Maryland community college on Thursday, Barack Hussein Obama accused Speaker of the House John Boehner of attempting to “blackmail” him as a result of the House’s vote to fund the government but defund Obamacare, the unpopular health care law, beginning October 1.
Obama was quoted as having said, “I have to say no Congress before this one has ever, ever in history been irresponsible enough to threaten default, to threaten an economic shut down, to suggest America not pay its bills just to try to blackmail a president into giving them some concessions on issues that have nothing to do with the budget.”
He also accused Congress of “governing from crisis to crisis.”
Obama’s former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, now serves as mayor of Chicago, which recorded the highest number of homicides in 2012. Until recently, when the Illinois Supreme Court determined that citizens have a legal right to carry guns outside of their home for protection, guns were banned in Chicago.
Emanuel is known for his remark that one should “never let a serious crisis go to waste.”
In August, Obama was quoted as having “threatened” to veto any bill containing funding at sequester levels, which has affected the military and other industries with across-the-board spending curtailments since March 1.
It has also been suggested that the Obama regime has “blackmailed” U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who reportedly was set to vote against the constitutionality of Obamacare but inexplicably changed his mind within 30 days of the announcement of the court’s decision. Some analysts say that Roberts “rewrote the law” to then deem it constitutional, and millions of citizens disagree with Roberts’ decision issued in June 2012.
Some say that Obama’s public comments directed to the U.S. Supreme Court before their decision was announced were “a veiled threat.” The regime told the Supreme Court that the Medicare program “‘would impose staggering administrative burdens” on the government and ‘could cause major delays and errors’ in claims payment.”
Sen. Mike Lee, who has also taken a stand against Obamacare, suggested in June that Roberts was “intimidated” into voting the way he did and published an online book about his observations. On June 14, Rep. Steve King of Iowa stated that Republicans discovered that their movements on the internet had been tracked by Democrats.
In early June, Edward Snowden revealed that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been collecting virtually every email and electronic communication of American citizens in likely violation of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. In 2011, Obama changed the internal policy of the NSA to allow it to “spy” domestically and not just overseas. World leaders became angry after learning that citizens of their countries had had their communications surveilled.
Prior to Snowden’s revelations, some had suggested that the Obama regime was blackmailing members of Congress.
At least one lawsuit claims that the ability of the IRS to make “rules” about how federal subsidies will be apportioned is a violation of the Affordable Care Act itself.
Obama insisted in his speech that “the Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” regardless of what the data show. He decried Republicans’ efforts to defund it, stating, “That’s not going to happen as long as long as I’m president.”
But Obama may not actually be “president.” His long-form and short-form birth certificate images as well as his Selective Service registration form have been declared fraudulent by a criminal investigation which is seeking a congressional investigation of its findings. Numerous inconsistencies about Obama’s life story and college years have never been reconciled. His school records, college theses and medical records have never been released to the public.
The obscured facts about Obama’s birthplace and citizenship have raised the questions as to whether or not he is a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.
The criminal investigation, carried out by the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse, also has affidavits from members of the media who said they were threatened for showing interest in the questions over Obama’s constitutional eligibility and the authenticity of his purported birth documentation before they were deemed to be fraudulent. Lead investigator Mike Zullo said that one journalist left the U.S. with her family out of fear for their safety. Canada Free Press also reported in August 2009 that several prominent media personalities were threatened to keep silent.
The mainstream media has refused to report the posse’s findings which have been confirmed by a document expert with 20 years of experience who has been performed work for Obama’s law firm, Perkins Coie.
Contrary to Obama’s claim of having been born in the state of Hawaii, a source described as highly reliable told Zullo that “there never was a birth in Hawaii” in regard to the man who calls himself “president.”
The U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” which many scholars believe means that the person was born in the country to two parents who were U.S. citizens at the time of the birth to avoid dual or alternate allegiances. In April 2009, the first of four Congressional Research Service (CRS) memos contended that a birth on U.S. soil was enough to qualify for the presidency, but the memos omitted crucial information from Supreme Court decisions which had included the citizenship of the parents in the various opinions rendered.
Obama purports to have a father who was never a U.S. citizen, which by that standard would make him ineligible. His official biography stated from 1991 until 2007 that he was “born in Kenya” but raised in Indonesia and Hawaii. However, the biography was changed to read that he had been born in Hawaii, not Kenya, in 2007 and attributed to a “fact-checking error.”
It is generally understood that a person born on foreign soil to foreign-citizen parents is not eligible for the U.S. presidency, although many in Congress have attempted to change the “natural born Citizen” requirement over the years.
In an interview with Infowars, Zullo suggested that members of Congress have been “blackmailed” by the Obama regime’s use of the NSA to gather personal information about them.
Last year, a commenter at Atty. Mario Apuzzo’s blog calling himself “Unknown” had referred to Obama’s purported procurement of a Hawaii birth certificate and other “crimes” by stating:
I think we have to accept that Obama got high level assistance that went well beyond his friends in Chicago. Clearly this is a first rate criminal intrigue. The list of crimes committed would fill hundreds of pages by now.
Currently there is a movement in Congress for impeachment over the use of military without Congressional approval. Might Obama have taken one step too many?
There are criminal who look like criminals. And there are those who look like Hollywood movie stars. The latter are a problem. Nixon looked like a crook. But Obama looks like a male model or sports guy.
The real question is this: Will Congress take the necessary steps and dump him; or will Black Mail Incorporated start to work and discourage its members?
Obama has refused to negotiate over the issue of the debt ceiling, which he wants Congress to raise without any conditions.
Because of his fraudulent documents, Obama may be subject to blackmail from political bosses and world leaders.