If Roberts Was Blackmailed, Will Obama Claim Plausible Deniability?

WILL THE REPUBLIC STAND AFTER THE TRUTH IS KNOWN?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 14, 2013) — Earlier this evening, a video clip from Glenn Beck’s TV show was released which contained a brief interview with Rep. Steve King of Iowa, who told Beck that Republicans are now aware that the Obama campaign monitored their internet activity during the 2012 election cycle.

On Monday, Beck will host Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, who reportedly be revealing that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was “pressured” last year to uphold the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as constitutional against his initial inclination.  On June 7, Beck hinted that Roberts was the object of blackmail but did not elaborate.

On Thursday, a video produced in New York City as Beck walked down Fifth Avenue divulged that Beck had had several significant meetings with members of Congress about an issue which he said could “take down the whole power structure” of the United States government.  He stressed that the country would go through a tumultuous and unprecedented cataclysm of sorts.

Beginning on June 6, The UK Guardian and The Washington Post released a series of articles each on the PRISM program, which taps into the databases of at least nine internet companies for information on users’ emails, photos, internet browsing, and Skype activity by the National Security Agency (NSA).  Whistleblower Edward Snowden, who flew to Hong Kong to make the revelations, claimed that he could no longer work as a contract employee after what he had seen while working for the NSA.

In an interview with The Guardian, Snowden said, “The government has granted itself power it is not entitled to. There is no public oversight. The result is people like myself have the latitude to go further than they are allowed to.”  Snowden believes that continuous surveillance of every movement of the American people has impinged on “transparency” and “democracy.”

King told Beck he could not confirm that Republicans’ internet activity was monitored by PRISM but that a program “similar to PRISM” was what was used to gather the information, unbeknownst to them at the time.

Beck has voiced his objections to the IRS, which exposed itself several weeks ago as having targeted Tea Party, pro-life, traditional marriage, and evangelical groups for extra scrutiny and invasive questioning beginning in 2010, as the manager of the monetary aspect of Obama’s health care program.

Obama began verbally marginalizing those he viewed as his political enemies shortly after taking office and following a Tea Party protest day on April 15, 2009.  Many Tea Party members want Obama impeached for what they see as excessive government spending.  Next month, the Obama family plans to take a trip to Africa which will reportedly cost taxpayers between $60,000,000 and $100,000,000 in a time when as many as one in four Americans cannot find gainful employment.  The Obamas have taken lavish vacations since becoming ensconced in the White House in January 2009 along with Michelle’s mother, Marion Robinson.

African newspapers have reported that Obama was born in Kenya, and Michelle has called Kenya “Barack’s home country.”  His biographer reported that he was born in Kenya until the narrative was changed in April 2007 to say that he was born in Hawaii, two months after he had announced that he was running for president.

Article II of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a “natural born Citizen,” which most Americans understand means born on U.S. soil.  However, the citizenship of the parents was also historically an important factor in a child’s citizenship.  Obama claims to have a father who was never a U.S. citizen, which by historical accounts would have disqualified Obama from the presidency.

Obama supporters have trolled the internet under false identities, disseminating propaganda, making threats, hacking email accounts, websites and servers, and lying about those challenging Obama’s legitimacy, eligibility, policies and identity.  Even after a law enforcement investigation showed Obama’s long-form birth certificate to be a “computer-generated forgery,” the use of Saul Alinsky tactics continued.  However, many Obama propaganda websites have vanished or have remained inactive for months as of this writing.

There is evidence that Obama trolls have engaged in criminal activity, which has been reported to various authorities.

Last June, the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the PPACA, known as “Obamacare,” was greatly anticipated by supporters and critics alike.  Twenty-six states had filed a lawsuit against the act, claiming that it was unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution and violated their Tenth Amendment rights.  A twenty-seventh state, Virginia, filed its own independent lawsuit.

It was widely believed that Obamacare would be struck down by a 5-4 vote of the Supreme Court, two members of whom were appointed by Obama and confirmed by the Senate. Before the ruling was announced on June 28 of last year, Obama “warned” the Court that it should not “take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

But were members of Congress blackmailed?  Were their internet activity, telephone conversations and emails monitored?

CBS exclusively reported on July 2 that Roberts had been prepared to declare the bill unconstitutional and had written most of what was then the majority opinion.  Inexplicably, Roberts changed his mind within 30 days of the ruling, to the surprise and chagrin of Justices Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy.  The opinion included an unusual politically-charged statement from Roberts which told the American electorate that if they did not like the laws their representatives passed, they should vote for different representation.

Since the bill was upheld, dozens of religious institutions have filed lawsuits against the mandate that they must provide abortifacients and birth control in violation of their beliefs, which the First Amendment was intended to protect.

Neither Obama nor his spokesman has ever explained the fraudulent birth certificate which has been posted on the White House website since April 27, 2011.  A compliant media has protected Obama from tough questions since at least 2007, with numerous familial relationships existing between White House employees and members of the corporate media.

While the media has always referred to him as “President Obama” since he took office in 2009, he might never have been a legitimate officeholder.

Mike Zullo, lead investigator of the Cold Case Posse, which performed the investigation on the birth certificate and found it to be fraudulent, said in a recent interview that Obama could claim “plausible deniability” of the forgery.  However, Zullo said that a large public outcry could catapult the issue to congressional action.  “We have to get it to Congress,” he said.  “The American people’s voice has been silenced on this issue…but I have real evidence now,” he said.  He suggested that a special prosecutor would be an effective avenue to carry out an investigation.

Zullo said that the only reasons why a forgery of Obama’s birth certificate would have been presented to the public would be to “add, conceal or erase certain information” or if a real document never existed.  Zullo has found that Obama does not seem to have a verifiable background.

If blackmail was used to alter Roberts’s vote, can Obama say he did not know?  Who made the alleged threat, and on what grounds?

If Roberts was blackmailed, can he remain Chief Justice of the Supreme Court?

If he was blackmailed, will Obamacare or any other decision in which Roberts has participated stand?

Did Obama effect a coup of the U.S. government?

Has Glenn Beck been told the answers to these questions?  Beck stated on Wednesday that the information about to be revealed over the next ten days “will rock” the United States and the world.  He seemed confident that “the truth” will emerge.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

– The Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776