“UNIMPEACHABLE EVIDENCE OF THE IDENTITY OF THE FORGER”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Jun. 7, 2013) — On Thursday, Montgomery Blair Sibley, who was a write-in candidate for President of the United States in 2012 and filed several challenges to the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama for the presidency, obtained a ruling to an appeal in his lawsuit, Sibley v. Obama. The U.S. District Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s opinion that Sibley did not have “standing” to bring the suit.
In a press release dated June 7, 2013, Sibley stated that “the Appeals has identified the only person who can challenged [sic] Obama’s legitimacy: Mitt Romney.”
Over the last 17 months, Sibley filed several cases alleging that Obama is not constitutionally eligible for the presidency under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the president must be a “natural born Citizen.” The court’s recent ruling made by a three-judge panel responded to Sibley’s request petition for a Writ of Quo Warranto, one of two he has filed in the matter of Obama’s eligibility to serve.
Page 2 of the ruling states, “Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.”
Sibley has therefore written a letter to Romney in which he relates that “publicly available evidence of the forgery of Mr. Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth (and other personal identifying documents) is overwhelming even to the casual observer.” Sibley told Romney that “What has not been publicly released is the unimpeachable evidence of the identity of the forger of Mr. Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth and the trail that leads to Mr. Obama himself…”
Sibley is requesting a private meeting with Romney in order to “play his trump card,” about which he states on his blog:
I am privy to the name of the forger of Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth and the trail which leads to Obama. I have kept this information private waiting for the right moment and for the right person to reveal it so that the media-lapdogs will have no alternative but to behave like real journalists rather than the administration cheerleaders they have become.
The Post & Email asked Sibley how he discovered the identity of the person or persons who committed the forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate, to which he responded, “There’s a team of individuals who have been working quietly in the background to gather the compelling, overwhelming amount of evidence, and I’ve been working with them on that as well. I’m one of a team.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Is it the Cold Case Posse?
MR. SIBLEY: In fact, it’s not.
THE POST & EMAIL: Would you say that you are 100% positive as to the identity of the person or people who created it?
MR. SIBLEY: As they say in the law, “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
THE POST & EMAIL: Are you able to say who it is at this point?
MR. SIBLEY: No, and there’s a tactical reason for that, which is from my mouth, it means nothing, but if Mr. Romney were to stand up and say, “Listen,” I think a lot of people would, in fact, listen.
THE POST & EMAIL: And your goal is to sit down with him face-to-face?
MR. SIBLEY: I would like to have a private meeting with my team and him and let him see exactly what we know and what it means, and let him decide what he needs to do based upon his feel of what his obligations are as a citizen and former candidate for whom some 50,000,000 people cast their votes.
THE POST & EMAIL: Do you think constitutionally, the court is correct that Romney is the only person who could challenge Obama’s legitimacy?
MR. SIBLEY: Absolutely not. It’s a continuation of the arc of limiting the public’s right to access the court for redress of grievances and this canard of “standing” that Justice Rehnquist made up two or three decades ago – I don’t want to use the word on tape how mad it makes me. We’ve lost our access to the court, because they’re saying a person can’t come to court unless you’re a special person.
MR. SIBLEY: There’s a genesis that actually goes back to the Judges’ Act of 1927 that blossomed under the Rehnquist court, and Justice Rehnquist learned at the foot of the Nuremberg trials under Justice Jackson. I think the way the Nazis took over their legal system infected him in a way with a virus which caused him to do the same thing here.
THE POST & EMAIL: How long have you been working with the team of people to discover the forger?
MR. SIBLEY: This team has been working for over a year quietly and keeping the results sotto voce until the right time and the right person are found to bring them forward.
THE POST & EMAIL: Are you able to file a criminal complaint yourself with your local prosecutor?
MR. SIBLEY: I’ve taken other evidence to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney in D.C., and they ignored it.
THE POST & EMAIL: Have you been following the developments with the Cold Case Posse, whose lead investigator gave two presentations last weekend and may have some congressional interest?
MR. SIBLEY: I have, and I’ve been in contact with the Cold Case Posse over the last several months. We’re on parallel tracks at this point in time. However, I believe that Congress has very little ability to do anything because their only authority is to impeach for high crimes, misdemeanors, bribery and treason. They can’t impeach for fraud, which is what the allegation is here. That’s why the legal proceeding of Quo Warranto which I brought and was told I’m not authorized to bring is the only legal redress that I’m aware of in the present state of affairs.
THE POST & EMAIL: Could identity fraud be considered a “high crime and misdemeanor?”
MR. SIBLEY: It’s such a fine legal point lost in the midst of legal terms of art – what is a high crime or misdemeanor – but in sum, it means a blow against the state, and I don’t think forgery in order to be elected is a blow against the state; it’s just a commonplace crime. Of course, if he gets convicted and thrown in jail, it becomes evidence.
THE POST & EMAIL: Do you have any idea when the forgery was created and the number of people involved in it?
MR. SIBLEY: Yes, we have solid answers to those questions, but it’s premature to disclose what we legally know at this time.
THE POST & EMAIL: How many crimes might have been committed with the creation of the fraudulent birth certificate?
MR. SIBLEY: There are lots of felonies: wire fraud, conspiracy to commit an offense to defraud the United States; possession of false papers to defraud the United States; naturalization fraud; false statements to obtain federal employees’ compensation; it could be rebellion or insurrection if the web of connections traces back to foreign interests. That’s not an allegation I’m making at this point, but it’s not beyond the realm of possibility, and then all of a sudden, you’re looking at a very serious felony.
THE POST & EMAIL: You mentioned “naturalization.” Does your research point to the possibility that Obama may not be a U.S. citizen?
MR. SIBLEY: That is my supposition alone at this point in time, and I’ve put that in legal pleadings and backed it up based on legal analysis of the statutes for U.S. citizenship when the mother is under 19 years of age. If that was his mother and she was under the age of 19, he didn’t become a citizen by operation of law.
THE POST & EMAIL: Do you believe his parents are the two people he has identified?
MR. SIBLEY: I honestly don’t have an opinion about that; all I’m working with is what he’s represented publicly to be the case, and that’s what’s causing the real problem. The real truth, I think, is that we’re several layers of onion skin away before we get down to the pearl of truth.
THE POST & EMAIL: Have you mailed the letter to Mitt Romney yet?
MR. SIBLEY: Indeed I have, and there’s a confirmation tracking number. As soon as it’s delivered, I’ll send that to you so you can see that it actually was delivered.
THE POST & EMAIL: Is there any closing statement you’d like to make in an attempt to move this forward?
MR. SIBLEY: Mr. Obama had promised “an unprecedented level of openness in Government.” Well, let’s just open it up a little bit more, Mr. Obama, and let the truth come in here.