If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

Will former presidential candidate Mitt Romney act upon Montgomery Blair Sibley’s letter?

(Jun. 7, 2013) — On Thursday, Montgomery Blair Sibley, who was a write-in candidate for President of the United States in 2012 and filed several challenges to the constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama for the presidency, obtained a ruling to an appeal in his lawsuit, Sibley v. Obama.  The U.S. District Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s opinion that Sibley did not have “standing” to bring the suit.

In a press release dated June 7, 2013, Sibley stated that “the Appeals has identified the only person who can challenged [sic] Obama’s legitimacy:  Mitt Romney.”

Over the last 17 months, Sibley filed several cases alleging that Obama is not constitutionally eligible for the presidency under Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states that the president must be a “natural born Citizen.”  The court’s recent ruling made by a three-judge panel responded to Sibley’s request petition for a Writ of Quo Warranto, one of two he has filed in the matter of Obama’s eligibility to serve.

Page 2 of the ruling states, “Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.  The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.”

Sibley has therefore written a letter to Romney in which he relates that “publicly available evidence of the forgery of Mr. Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth (and other personal identifying documents) is overwhelming even to the casual observer.”  Sibley told Romney that “What has not been publicly released is the unimpeachable evidence of the identity of the forger of Mr. Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth and the trail that leads to Mr. Obama himself…”

Sibley is requesting a private meeting with Romney in order to “play his trump card,” about which he states on his blog:

I am privy to the name of the forger of Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth and the trail which leads to Obama.  I have kept this information private waiting for the right moment and for the right person to reveal it so that the media-lapdogs will have no alternative but to behave like real journalists rather than the administration cheerleaders they have become.

The Post & Email asked Sibley how he discovered the identity of the person or persons who committed the forgery of Obama’s long-form birth certificate, to which he responded, “There’s a team of individuals who have been working quietly in the background to gather the compelling, overwhelming amount of evidence, and I’ve been working with them on that as well.  I’m one of a team.”

THE POST & EMAIL:  Is it the Cold Case Posse?

MR. SIBLEY:  In fact, it’s not.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Would you say that you are 100% positive as to the identity of the person or people who created it?

MR. SIBLEY:  As they say in the law, “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

THE POST & EMAIL:  Are you able to say who it is at this point?

MR. SIBLEY:  No, and there’s a tactical reason for that, which is from my mouth, it means nothing, but if Mr. Romney were to stand up and say, “Listen,” I think a lot of people would, in fact, listen.

THE POST & EMAIL:  And your goal is to sit down with him face-to-face?

MR. SIBLEY:  I would like to have a private meeting with my team and him and let him see exactly what we know and what it means, and let him decide what he needs to do based upon his feel of what his obligations are as a citizen and former candidate for whom some 50,000,000 people cast their votes.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think constitutionally, the court is correct that Romney is the only person who could challenge Obama’s legitimacy?

MR. SIBLEY:  Absolutely not.  It’s a continuation of the arc of limiting the public’s right to access the court for redress of grievances and this canard of “standing” that Justice Rehnquist made up two or three decades ago – I don’t want to use the word on tape how mad it makes me.  We’ve lost our access to the court, because they’re saying a person can’t come to court unless you’re a special person.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Did the change in “standing” came with the revisions to the Rules of Criminal and Civil Procedures in 1946?

MR. SIBLEY:  There’s a genesis that actually goes back to the Judges’ Act of 1927 that blossomed under the Rehnquist court, and Justice Rehnquist learned at the foot of the Nuremberg trials under Justice Jackson.  I think the way the Nazis took over their legal system infected him in a way with a virus which caused him to do the same thing here.

THE POST & EMAIL:  How long have you been working with the team of people to discover the forger?

MR. SIBLEY:  This team has been working for over a year quietly and keeping the results sotto voce until the right time and the right person are found to bring them forward.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Are you able to file a criminal complaint yourself with your local prosecutor?

MR. SIBLEY:  I’ve taken other evidence to the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney in D.C., and they ignored it.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Have you been following the developments with the Cold Case Posse, whose lead investigator gave two presentations last weekend and may have some congressional interest?

MR. SIBLEY:  I have, and I’ve been in contact with the Cold Case Posse over the last several months.  We’re on parallel tracks at this point in time.  However, I believe that Congress has very little ability to do anything because their only authority is to impeach for high crimes, misdemeanors, bribery and treason. They can’t impeach for fraud, which is what the allegation is here.  That’s why the legal proceeding of Quo Warranto which I brought and was told I’m not authorized to bring is the only legal redress that I’m aware of in the present state of affairs.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Could identity fraud be considered a “high crime and misdemeanor?”

MR. SIBLEY:  It’s such a fine legal point lost in the midst of legal terms of art – what is a high crime or misdemeanor – but in sum, it means a blow against the state, and I don’t think forgery in order to be elected is a blow against the state; it’s just a commonplace crime.  Of course, if he gets convicted and thrown in jail, it becomes evidence.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you have any idea when the forgery was created and the number of people involved in it?

MR. SIBLEY:  Yes, we have solid answers to those questions, but it’s premature to disclose what we legally know at this time.

THE POST & EMAIL:  How many crimes might have been committed with the creation of the fraudulent birth certificate?

MR. SIBLEY:  There are lots of felonies:  wire fraud, conspiracy to commit an offense to defraud the United States; possession of false papers to defraud the United States; naturalization fraud; false statements to obtain federal employees’ compensation; it could be rebellion or insurrection if the web of connections traces back to foreign interests.  That’s not an allegation I’m making at this point, but it’s not beyond the realm of possibility, and then all of a sudden, you’re looking at a very serious felony.

THE POST & EMAIL:  You mentioned “naturalization.”  Does your research point to the possibility that Obama may not be a U.S. citizen?

MR. SIBLEY:  That is my supposition alone at this point in time, and I’ve put that in legal pleadings and backed it up based on legal analysis of the statutes for U.S. citizenship when the mother is under 19 years of age.  If that was his mother and she was under the age of 19, he didn’t become a citizen by operation of law.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you believe his parents are the two people he has identified?

MR. SIBLEY:  I honestly don’t have an opinion about that; all I’m working with is what he’s represented publicly to be the case, and that’s what’s causing the real problem.  The real truth, I think, is that we’re several layers of onion skin away before we get down to the pearl of truth.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Have you mailed the letter to Mitt Romney yet?

MR. SIBLEY:  Indeed I have, and there’s a confirmation tracking number.  As soon as it’s delivered, I’ll send that to you so you can see that it actually was delivered.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Is there any closing statement you’d like to make in an attempt to move this forward?

MR. SIBLEY:  Mr. Obama had promised “an unprecedented level of openness in Government.”  Well, let’s just open it up a little bit more, Mr. Obama, and let the truth come in here.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. I have a few thoughts on various topics mentioned in the article and in certain responses. 1) Mitt Romney is NOT an enemy of America. The election was stolen from him by a wide array of nefarious tactics that have been discussed here before; 2) about 3 days ago, when the Sibley info FIRST appeared here and elsewhere, well suddenly Neil Cavuto was spending one hour interviewing Romney from somewhere in Utah; Romney had hosted a large meeting with a diverse group to address America’s economice problems — he stated that many Repub’s attended, as well as Dem’s and Prog”s, (probably some Marxists too) – he named David Axelrod, and my former classsmate John Hickenlooper (who somehow turned his failed attempts to make a micro – brewery in Denver into the Governorship-go figure); 3) LAW BREAKING THAT CAN LEAD TO THE ARREST OF ANY PERSON — I will summarize a LONG story — it is a fact that the Racketeering Laws (used originally against the Mafia) have MORPHED over the last 40 years into “tools to arrest any person” — If any person has committed ANY felony (ANY – especially if it defrauds the taxpayers or the US Government) AND if said fraud/felony was aided / implemented by using the US Mail or a Government equivalent on at least 3 occassions, then such activity is a RICO violation and the group / person(s) involved are guilty of Racketeering ! PERIOD. Does anyone know of emails and letters from the office of POTUS that were used for financial gain ?? Well those acts, plus established fraud and CCP proven felonies create a RICO situation. 4) I am 1 million percent puzzled as to WHY any Congressman, any Senator, any Sheriff, any peace officer, any US attorney NOT beholden to Eric the RED, why a Sargeant-at-Arms, can NOT make/facilitate an arrest? It appears to be ONE BIG Excuse !

  2. What a Complete and UTTER Waste of Time!!!~”RAPID ROMNEY” already has displayed the “SKULL’n’CROSSBONES” of “RINO-ISIM”~HE already negated his opportunity to “‘GIT ‘ER DONE” and instead displayed the “Colors of TREASON” with his IN-Actions and Refusal to consider the Facts about “O”~
    ‘Nuff Said, Fine’~

  3. Obama (Bari Malik Shabazz) is using a POTUS protection clause to pay the DNC Law Firm Perkins Coie in Seattle to keep his papers sealed from the public, using our tax dollars to the tune of over $4 million payed to the firm thus far. If Obama’s mother-Ann Newman, daughter of radical/Communist/Socialist Dr. Fred Newman/associate of Ayers/Malcolm X/Axelrod/ and other radical DNC top leaders was with either Malcolm X or Frank Marshal Davis-that would make Obama legal with Art. 2 Sect. 1. BUT when mommy dropped off little baby Obama to Jakarta’s Muslim Boy’s Prep School for eight years in Indonesia, by their Constitution he had to become an Indonesian Citizen as an adopted child of Soetoro, the Constitution states that you cannot hold dual citizenship and be POTUS. The problem is, we need to demand his Citizenship Papers, we already know Obama is using a false SS/number. HIS PAPERS NEED TO BE SHOWN to the public-NOW! Stop the games, show the papers! We have had copies of the DNC Vetting Papers on line for over 4 years and no one wanted to know anything, since we live in a basically “after the fact” nation-we will have to see more destruction before any of this is ALLOWED to play out and Obama goes off in the sunset to his $35 million retirement mansion-see http://www.wnd.com for that one. Pelosi/Biden falsified the DNC papers to 50 States falsely vetting Obama at the time. Many people knew about what was done but getting these criminals out and prosecution will be nearly impossible till terms have expired. It would have happened right after the 2008 election if the Constitutional Lockdown and blatant/arrogance/obfuscation to keep Obama in power. “No Standing” has been used for quite a while and I am sure that Hillary has been part of the Judicial shakedown and employed her covert friends to keep up the pressure. We have to especially have to pay attention to LTCDR Fitzpatric/Lakin/Wood/Huff knowing they were the first to stand up for the Constitution before all the others were “illegally investigated” and we know see clearly how “THE FOGBOW” and other operative groups were connected at all levels that we only suspected a few years ago. We are fighting for America’s survival and our freedom folks, it’s time to wake up-the “Reality Show” is in DC and it’s our survival that is on trial for the greed of the DNC and other parts of their Socialist agenda’s. High Treason, Perjury, Election Fraud, Identity Fraud, Usurpation Of POTUS, wanton destruction of America. The last time I checked, that crime dialed the “death penalty”. Where have all the “honorable” men or woman of the Judicial gone? They hold the power and yet allowed it to be taken from us to protect themselves at all costs. I admire Montgomery Sibley for applying all his talent to help with the truth and all the time he spent just to find out he was being ignored by the courts but he flushed many of the birds out of the brush for all to see. We need a lot more flushing, maybe a complete cleanout of DC.

  4. TREASON, plain and simple … a firing squad is definitely called for. Will we see it? When hell freezes over. Sorry.