ORDERS ENTERED, THEN NOT ENTERED
by Sharon Rondeau
(Feb. 13, 2013) — In a case filed on November 29, 2012 by former presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley challenging the results of the November 6 presidential election as a voter in the District of Columbia, an order allegedly issued by the court was never sent to either the plaintiff or the defendant.
An interview with Mr. Sibley in December 2012 details three cases which Sibley had filed regarding the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as president, one of which will be considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday.
The lawsuit names the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics as the defendant and challenges Obama’s eligibility and purported re-election. The case is currently filed with the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Sibley accepts that Obama meets two requirements of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution which state that the president must be at least 35 years of age and have resided in the country for 14 years. However, he contends that Obama is neither a citizen of the United States under the Fourteenth Amendment nor a “natural born Citizen,” which is the third requirement contained in clause 5.
On page 3 of his pleading, Sibley cited evidence of forgery in both the short-form Certification of Live Birth and long-form Certificate of Live Birth which Obama has released in image form to the public using the analysis of typesetting professional Douglas Vogt.
The Post & Email interviewed Vogt after he produced a lengthy report on his findings and contacted Congress, later filing a criminal complaint with the FBI. His report is included as an exhibit in Sibley’s petition.
Sibley also quoted Mara Zebest, an Adobe and Microsoft program expert and co-author, who provided a detailed report on her findings of forgery in the long-form birth certificate to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, which has conducted its own investigation into the image and found it fraudulent.
Zebest stated during a press conference with Dr. Jerome Corsi that the long-form birth certificate is “manufactured.” “This is not only a fake document; it is an obvious fake document, she said. “It is impossible that this document could be authentic.”
Sibley claimed in his petition that Obama was reported to have been born in Kenya by at least one source; that his mother was under the age of 19 at the time of the birth, which made her unable to confer U.S. citizenship to her child under 8 USC §1401; and that Obama’s claim of a father who was a citizen of another country at the time of his birth rendered Obama ineligible for the presidency.
On page 8, Sibley argues that Obama cannot be eligible because he was not definitely born in the United States and was not born to two citizen parents as outlined by Emmerich de Vattel in The Law of Nations, upon which it is believed the Framers relied heavily when drafting the U.S. Constitution. Sibley concludes by asking the Court to declare Obama ineligible and to “set aside the results” of the November 6 election.
Sibley has questioned whether or not “concealment, removal, or mutilation” of a court document has transpired.
When Sibley contacted the court for updated information on his case on February 1, he was told that “on January 16, 2013, the Court entered an Order.” Upon contacting the defendant’s counsel, he learned that the she had not received a copy of the alleged order by mail, but rather, had obtained it by going to the Court in person.
Sibley has asked for an emergency “en banc hearing” of all 12 judges on the federal appeals court to hear the case as a result of the missing order. The Court then stated on February 6 that “no order was entered on January 16, 2013″ in its system.
When The Post & Email asked Mr. Sibley if he believed that something criminal had occurred, he stated, “I don’t know yet. I’ve alleged that there’s criminal behavior because either somebody issued an order from the Court without authority or they lied about it. It has to be one or the other, in my opinion.”
Sibley wants the court to “publicly announce what happened” in the case of the two “orders.” “If you can’t trust the clerk to actively reflect the workings of the Court, the Court must publicly say what they did,” he said.
Regarding Sibley’s other two cases, as stated earlier, the Supreme court will consider one in conference on Friday. “The other case against the DC electors has been stalled as well because the court was supposed to have a hearing this Friday but adjourned without announcing another day,” Sibley told us.
The Post & Email asked, “Can a court just adjourn like that and say ‘We’re not going to hear this?'” to which Sibley responded, “Yes, they can, and ultimately you go to a superior court or appellate court to make them do something. This is one of their procedural mechanisms for avoiding making decisions.”
Sibley has also asked the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia to present his allegations of malfeasance at the court to a federal grand jury.
Regarding the case to be conferenced by the U.S. Supreme Court at the end of the week, Sibley said, “I believe I’ve petitioned them with very significant issues which go to the very heart of the contract between the people and their federal government and the usurpation of the people’s right by the federal government, and if the court is going to ignore that, then in my mind, we’ve had a coup d’etat. So we’ll just have to wait and see what happens on Friday.”
Sibley expects the decision of the Supreme Court to be announced next Tuesday.
Let’s go back a short while when Orly had the case in California with Judge Carter. We know what happened with that BUT do you remember that report that told of Perkins Coie DNC Firm installing a “plant” in Carter’s office while the case was being set up be “blown out” and flushed under the rug? Now we see the same dirty judicial tricks behind closed doors at the highest levels. Blair Sibley is a very bright man and we have to pray for him that there may be a non-coward left in the “Judicial” that will do what is right and allow this usurpation to come to a close and let prosecution begin.
The total disregard for any rule of law has been the operation for a long time. Barry Soetero is the selected operative to carry out the destruction of America. Why do you think the CIA, FBI, CONgress, DHS, DoJ, and armed forces won’t investigate and prosecute?
The evil is so sinister, Satan himself is amazed at their diabolical plot. The players are right in front of your eyes. Party lines are foolish loyalties. The Republic has been hijacked and few can or will see that truth. Plan for a Depression on steroids. That is positive thinking…
The U.S. Attoney for D.C.,Ronald Machen is malfeasant, I have been sending him evidence of Obama’s fraud and ursurpation for over four years now. There is widespread misprision of felony and treason afoot. In addition,extreme dereliction of duty on the part of many in the current government. Note: It was a USDC-WDNY magistrate that advised me that D.C. IS the proper venue in which to file a Criminal Information against Obama,an AO91. I have retained a copy of that letter from the Magistrate. Machen has had that for years. I suppose that he filed it in his “Circular File” (ie.,waste paper basket).