If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

Was the instructional program identifying evangelical Christians and Catholics “an isolated incident” or a planned propaganda product?

(May 1, 2013) — CitizenLink has reported that the Pentagon is poised to enforce a policy which would punish, and possibly court-martial, U.S. service members who express their Christian faith with other military personnel while in uniform.

The report comes after a U.S. Army trainer’s curriculum was found to have identified evangelical Christians and Catholics as “extremists” and mirrors the FBI’s contention that those quoting from the Bible or the U.S. Constitution, which was founded on biblical principles, could be considered “potential domestic terrorists” and “Sovereign Citizens.”

After the training program became public, an Army spokesman described it as “an isolated incident.”  However, a man who labeled “fundamentalist Christians” as “monsters” who are part of “gangs” and founded the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) met with military personnel at the Pentagon which reportedly included “several generals and a military chaplain.”

Mikey Weinstein compares evangelical Christians as guilty of “treason and sedition,” and Obama has reportedly asked Weinstein to “write the religious tolerance policies for the military.”  The Obama regime is paying Weinstein to act as a “consultant” on “religious tolerance.”

Religious symbols have been ordered removed from military chapels and biblical inscriptions from some Army gun scopes to be “painted black” amidst the claim from a spokesman for the Family Research Council that “a Christian cleansing of the military is under way.”

Weinstein believes that “Islamophobia” and “anti-Semitism” which he claims are present in the military pose a “national security threat.”

Shortly after Obama took office, in April 2009, he ordered religious “signs and symbols” at Georgetown University to be draped in black so that they could not be seen while he delivered a “policy speech.”  During the same month, his Department of Homeland Security issued a report naming returning veterans and those opposing illegal immigration could become “right-wing extremists,” with the depiction of a gun prominently displayed in one of the Obama regime’s propaganda outlets, The Huffington Post.  The Homeland Security report claimed that “right-wing extremists” were using “propaganda” to recruit new members as a result of the poor economy and “in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country.”

On December 14, 2010, a 20-year-old man reportedly entered an elementary school in Newtown, CT and murdered 20 first-graders and six educators, prompting Obama to pressure Congress to pass an assault weapons ban and legislation including universal background checks for all firearms purchases.  To date, Congress has not passed any new firearms bills, although the states of Colorado, Maryland, Connecticut and New York have passed new restrictions on purchasing and owning firearms.
Four years later, none of the violent attacks which have occurred while America’s “first black president” has been in the White House were found to have been perpetrated by a “right-wing extremist.”  Those expressing the desire for the Boston Marathon bombings to be caused by “a white American” were mute when the first suspects were identified as ethnic Chechen Muslims who became radicalized after having received benefits from the U.S. government and about whom the FBI had been warned by two foreign countries.

Obama’s Justice Department is currently attempting to deport a Christian family who fled their home country of Germany because they wished to home-school their children.  However, Obama’s FBI allowed identified radicals to remain in the country, where they killed and maimed civilians by setting off explosives after receiving taxpayer-funded benefits.

Obama’s Department of Homeland Security has covered up the fact that a Saudi national was identified as a “person of interest” on the same day as the Boston bombings, including an alteration to the man’s file after he was designated a “national security threat.”

The Post & Email has contacted the Pentagon media unit for comment on the alleged upcominginstruction booklet” on religious policy within the military.

Weinstein reportedly complained about Christian and Jewish holiday displays at Travis Air Force Base.  Weinstein calls his work “advocacy” and fighting for “religious liberties” within the military to “support our brave men and women in uniform.”

MRFF has reportedly been nominated to receive the Nobel Peace Prize this year.  Predecessors of the prize include Barack Obama, who professes to be a Christian but has a fraudulent birth certificate, and Yasser Arafat, who was a Palestinian terrorist.  The MRFF was also nominated for the coveted award in 2010 and has worked to remove Christian symbols and insignia from military supplies and hospitals.

Many do not believe that Obama is a Christian, but rather, a Muslim or Muslim sympathizer after he described “my Muslim faith” in 2008 and traveled to the Middle East in 2009, speaking from a holy mosque in Cairo which non-Muslims are not allowed to enter.

Weinstein also refers to Christians as “extremists.”  Are such references “isolated instances” or orchestrated attacks on those who believe in the Bible and pose a threat to the Obama empire?

If Christians can be persecuted and prosecuted for speaking about their religious beliefs, what is Obama’s next step?

Relying on the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) to spew propaganda against groups and individuals with a political motive, the Obama regime teaches the military that discussion of “individual liberties” and “states’ rights” could be an attempt to recruit people into “Neo-Nazi” and other radical groups. The SPLC names “Patriot” groups as “anti-government.”

If Obama’s operatives can imprison a man for something he was accused of thinking, will Christians become the next political prisoners in re-education camps?

Perhaps Obama, who uses a fraudulent birth certificate and Selective Service registration form, is the true “national security threat” guilty of “treason.”

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The correlation between the Nazi takeover of Germany in the 1930’s and the “Yes We Can” Party of Obama are too parallel to be coincidental.
    Unfortunately, if people make the same mistakes as others have made in the past and expect different results is the classic definition of lunacy.
    All the signs are there for everyone to see, including the ever expansion of Islam into Europe, Canada and the USA, and to expect Muslims to somehow act differently over here rather than over there is yet another classic definition of lunacy.
    Imagine having the Ten Commandments posted on the doors of Congress, or let’s make it just one, “Thou shall not steal”. It shut the government down in a heartbeat; members of Congress would quit in droves and hightail it back to their districts where they’d be forced to get a real job and maybe, for once in their shallow lives (most of them), work for a living and if they got caught stealing they’d go to jail, unlike the felonious behavior of today’s Congress.
    Getting back to expected results: to expect anything other than a Scorched Earth and Total Devastation of America after Obama and the intellectually challenged Obots get through implementing their insane policies is THE classic definition of lunacy.
    Written in The Year of Our Lord, 2013.