If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Sharon Rondeau

Galileo Galilei was a physicist, astronomer and later deemed the “Father of Modern Science” after his theory of “heliocentrism” was proven accurate, although he was kept under house arrest for heresy on account of his theories.

(Feb. 26, 2013) — In a radio interview on Tuesday, Michigan State Senator Tom Casperson said he did not know where Barack Hussein Obama was born, after which the mainstream media began its customary ridicule and editorializing masquerading as journalism.

The media does not ask why questions about Obama’s birthplace and history have persisted over more than four years, but rather, attempts to marginalize anyone who voices a concern.

Since Casperson’s interview, the political organization “Progress Michigan” featured a story about it on its website, which seeks “to provide a strong credible voice that holds public officials and government accountable, assists in the promotion of progressive ideas and uses state-of-the-art web based new media to creatively build grassroots support for progressive ideas.”  The group’s executive director declared that “Questioning the President’s birthplace is like believing in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness Monster.”

There are numerous reports of sightings of a “Loch Ness Monster,” and many believe that there is a Bigfoot creature living in the wild.  Galileo Galilei was placed under house arrest after presenting his theory that the earth rotated around the sun instead of the other way around, a contention also believed by the scientist Copernicus, although he did not publish his research for fear of ridicule.

No hospital in Hawaii has confirmed that Obama was born there, and a letter used to raise funds for Kapiolani Medical Center was immediately cloaked after the hospital was questioned on it by a media outlet in 2009.

It is generally believed that a person must be born on U.S. soil to be considered a “natural born Citizen,” which Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution requires of the president and commander-in-chief of the military.  However, many scholars believe that the intent of “natural born Citizen,” as opposed to simply “a citizen,” was to ensure sole allegiance to the United States by requiring the parents to also be U.S. citizens, either by naturalization or descent.

Left-wing websites have seized upon Casperson’s comments by asking, “Casperson’s not sure about Obama’s birthplace…How much proof does State Sen. Tom Casperson want?” Casperson stated that the questions surrounding Obama were relegated to “a conspiracy theory” because the media failed to perform its due diligence into his background.

The Huffington Post reported that Casperson had “joined the ranks of conservative ‘birthers’ who have raised doubts about the validity of the president’s birth certificate.”

However, it was neither “conservatives” nor “birthers” who first “raised doubts about the validity of the president’s birth certificate,” but rather, software, Adobe®, and computer graphics experts.  Within hours of the image’s release on the White House website on April 27, 2011, experts declared it a crude forgery.  Mara Zebest, a co-author of more than a dozen books on Adobe software, staked her reputation on the claim during a press conference in June of that year.

The short-form certificate image released in June 2008 which first denoted Obama’s father as a member of the “African” race when “Negro” was the commonly-used term of the era was also declared a forgery by experienced investigators.  Tabloids have reported more on the alleged birth certificate forgery than mainstream media outlets.

After the publication of the long-form image, members of two Arizona Tea Party groups approached Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio to request a formal investigation into its validity.  A “Cold Case Posse” of volunteers was assembled at no cost to taxpayers.  An initial press conference was held on March 1, 2012, at which time lead investigator Michael Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio stated that they had found probable cause to believe that the Selective Service registration form and long-form birth certificate containing Obama’s name were “computer-generated forgeries.”

The press failed to investigate, and the posse held a second press conference on July 17 to state that there was no longer any doubt that the birth certificate image had been created on a computer and not from an original paper document.

Congress would not investigate, and the FBI will not respond to pleas from the public to perform its sworn duty.

On November 9, 2012, Zullo signed an affidavit which outlined the Cold Case Posse’s findings after making two trips to Hawaii and speaking with a former registrar at the Hawaii Department of Health, also noting the reports of Obama’s use of a fraudulent Social Security number.  In a radio interview in September, Zullo had said that Obama “is the only American president that has Soebarkah,” and possibly “Bari M. Shabazz.”  He has provided conflicting accounts of his early life, including that he was born to married parents but also to a young, single mother.  His wife Michelle first reported that his mother was “very young and very single” when Obama was born, and she also called Kenya Obama’s “home country.”

Obama’s biographer had stated that he had been born in Kenya up until 2007, when suddenly the story was changed to say that he was born in Hawaii.

Why would someone’s two birth certificates, Selective Service form, Social Security number, and life story all be fraudulent?

If Obama has committed identity fraud to appear eligible for the presidency or to cover his true past, is the media complicit in the cover-up?  Journalists are expected to investigate, not propagate stories which may not be accurate.

As in the case of Richard Nixon, is the cover-up worse than the crime?

On Tuesday evening, The Post & Email contacted the author of the Progress Michigan article, Jessica Tramontana, with information in the public domain regarding Obama’s documentation with a request for comment:

Hello, I read your story about Sen. Casperson’s comments on a radio show today regarding Barack Obama’s birthplace.

Your executive director stated that questioning Obama’s birthplace is “like believing in Bigfoot…”

Is he aware that a law enforcement entity has declared Obama’s long-form birth certificate, short-form birth certificate, and Selective Service registration form “computer-generated forgeries?”  http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Affidavit-of-Mike-Zullo.pdf

The Social Security number Obama is using also has been reported to have been “stolen” or not assigned to him:  http://www.scribd.com/collections/3260742/Barack-Obama-Social-Security-Number-SSN-Fraudulent

Would you be willing to comment on these assertions?

Thank you very much.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email

We are awaiting Ms. Tramontana’s response.


Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Obama has committed Treason. He cannot serve in “Any office under the United States of America”.

    See 18USC,Part 1,Chapter 115,Sec.2381

    That he has usurped the Presidency and that we are in a “time of War” makes Obama a SPY under the UCMJ at Section 906,Article 106.

  2. Fact remains that Obama’s claimed Father was NOT an American. THAT alone DQs Obama.,even if Obama WAS born in Hawaii.

    Note: See “The Apology” issued by Bill Clinton as President, to Hawaii.

    In it Clinton admitted that Hawaii was illegally annexed by the USA.

    Hawaii isn’t a bona-fides State. It is a sovereign Nation.

  3. I would be more likely to believe Bigfoot exists, than to believe Obama/Soetoro/?’s real Hawaiian birth certificate exists as presented.

  4. I sincerely doubt Ms. Tramontana will comment. She will go the way of every other progressive journalist…that is to ignore anyone who questions what he/she has written. If by chance she does, you will never get any indisputable facts from her…just more smoke and mirrors.

  5. Maybe we have to wait until the obama Presidential Library site has been selected to find out where he was really born. Since no hospital in Hawaii will claim him, that rules out Hawaii as a possible location. That still leaves Mombassa or maybe Jakarta.

  6. Great post.
    Now that the SCOTUS has officially refused to allow discovery into the subject of Obama’s eligibility to be President, in a case in which this forgery and fraud has been so clearly documented (Noonon v Bowen), the expectation for a successful legal challenge is now beyond hope. This does not mean these challenges should end, it just means we patriots must accept the reality our Judicial System is corrupt from the very top down.

    Somehow, we patriots must come together and force the Republican controlled House to exercise its constitutional authority and responsibility to immediately take up this issue, hold hearings, invite Sheriff Arpaio and Dr. Orly Taitz to present their case and appoint a special prosecutor to open up the authentic records Obama has ordered sealed by executive order.

    This is the only way this Republic can be saved, as a Republic with a meaningful constitution.

    1. This assumption that Republicans will honor their oath of office in upholding the Constitution is erroneous. To date not ONE CONgress member has demonstrated integrity or conviction to the Rule of Law.

      The hijacking of AmEriKa has been in progress for a long time. The fruition of decades of moral erosion, greed, and foreign powers is now visible. All with eyes wide shut.

      1. I agree, they have not and will not unless they are forced to do so. That is our job and if we patriots would unite on this one point we could force them to do so.

  7. Dear Editor,
    Oldest trick in the book: if you can’t attack the facts, attack the messenger.
    Actually, it’s the easiest way to prove a point and win the argument.
    Let’s break it down to the basics.
    “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire”.
    Okay, that makes sense, but what if there were no smoke, just the reporting of someone who may have seen the illusion of smoke, what then?
    Well, according to Dan Rather, an unsubstantiated report of smoke is good enough, the jury has reached a verdict, now we can all go home.