OR DO THEY MEAN ANYTHING AT ALL?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Sep. 26, 2012) — After many weeks of “dead-heat” poll reports in the mainstream media, a recent report from Karl Rove suggests that Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney is actually leading by eight points nationally and has experienced increased support in former “swing” states.
Rasmussen states that Obama is still leading in swing states, with the economy continuing to be the main concern for voters. Whether or not the individuals polled will actually vote is not clear. Some have reported that pollsters tend to survey more Democrats than Republicans and favor their chosen candidate. A former journalist claims that polls do “not…reflect reality, but…distort it.” Are major voting blocs camouflaging their intentions when speaking with pollsters in an effort to maintain their previous loyalty?
Romney is reported to have a 14-point advantage over Obama with middle-class families. It is predicted that fewer young people and minorities will vote in 2012. The Romney campaign is relying on its internal polling, particularly in the state of Ohio, which is considered essential for him to win the White House.
Many states have early voting, with some beginning next week.
In “blue” Connecticut, Obama does not show a “clear advantage” which he was reported to have had just weeks ago. In June, he had a 52% approval rating in the Constitution state, where the state Democratic Party chairwoman “assumed” that Obama was “still very popular.” Why was she not sure? Could the race there be competitive?
Romney has been reported to have been extremely generous to people in need. Questions about Obama’s Social Security number, long-form birth certificate and Selective Service card still exist and have been raised in several lawsuits filed to compel discovery into the purported forgeries.
Do Obama’s supporters know about these concerns? Has the media informed them?
Obama raised slightly more money than Romney nationally in August after three months of trailing Romney. The media has been markedly favoring Obama since the 2008 campaign, including a failure to report on the conclusion that his “documentation” consists of forgeries and fraud.
Romney leads with both young and older veterans by 20 percentage points. But is he “running out of time?”
A new polling source claims to be providing “unskewed” data and shows Romney leading by more than seven points nationally.
One analyst states that the trending of stock prices has historically predicted who the next president would be about 82% of the time.
The win by Ronald Reagan in 1980 was reportedly an upset not predicted by the polls, although one source reports that Reagan was polling ahead of Carter prior to election day.
Which candidate would support and defend the U.S. Constitution most effectively? Is the American electorate concerned with that or more concerned with a “stash” of cash which they would not earn but from which they would benefit?
Do we fight for freedom or capitulate to bondage? “Squander or save?”
Update: On September 25, Dick Morris reported that Mitt Romney actually leads in several states which Obama won in 2008. Morris said that polling this year has been based on 2008 voter models not applicable to this year’s election and that Obama’s reported leads in such states as Ohio and Florida are much smaller than the mainstream media has reported.
More Muslim empowerment to Sharia Law being forced on U.S. Citizens without their vote or permission. Hillary and her demons are enabling the legal allowance of the Muslim entitlement. Hillary enabled them as “displaced minorities” which allows free business loans, health and dental care, welfare, food stamps, cell phones, free cars, $20,000 for college, exemption from zoning laws nationwide, housing, job placement, etc. Do you think real Americans would allow this while our legal citizens, veterans, unemployed, displaced people that have lost everything after working their entire lives and professionals that have run out of money and can’t get hired because of being classed as “overqualified” would “approve” these criminal free giveaways of taxpayers money without a vote or permission while they flounder in a job market that is destroyed for most people? Who exactly “approved” these massive “giveaways” to people that are not citizens and when America’s own citizens can’t get a job or sustain themselves? You can start with Hillary for many things and places to look at but Treason, Perjury and Election Fraud charges are still waiting at the gate for those charged. We are all waiting to see if the American Law System will let the people down that support it and give them their paychecks. It is time for America to wake up and rise to the cause and get Communists, Black Panther Members, Socialists, Muslims, Anti-American trash and any others that don’t support our Constitution as it is written to get out of our country. Any LEO’s or other “agents” that don’t stand up for their right to follow and protect the Constitution should not be able to work or operate in authority of America law. Bari Shabazz, Pelosi, Biden, Michelle, Hillary, Holder, Sharpton, Jackson and all of the Communist/Socialist/Muslim members of the DNC should be on trial for Treason, Perjury and Election Fraud and deliberate continued attempts to sabotage and destroy the Constitutional Law of The United States and it’s Military. What are they waiting for, anarchy/bankruptcy/social war? Yes, that is what they want according to Glenn Beck’s report on “The Project” government plan to force Muslim law and social ethics on Amerian citizens without their consent or vote.
The polls actually spell LACK of support for Obama.
As in every election, many are tightlipped and will just wait for Election Day to express themselves. Some will express themselves by NOT going to vote. Droves of otherwise traditional Democrats are fed up with Mr O and will prove it very soon.
O is probably at the top of polls amongst the Iranian government, however.
His UN Grovel Tour was right out of the Islamist Handbook. By incessantly mentioning “the video” he was making publicity for it.
It was a study of Caesar’s book of Rhetoric: Talking about something by Dismissing it.
Why?
One COULD conjecture that O’s TRUE impetus is something more akin to Islamic Messianism’s goal to hasten the return of Imam Mahdi, than “leader” of the “free world.” To bring back the “hidden imam” there must be World War and a great loss of life after which Mahdi will return and ALL will be Muslim..either by will, by force and, if still not, losing one’s head. Those are the options..not many!
Did anyonoe notice how O ticked off a list of his official roles in America? He said he was Chief Executive and Commander in Chief.
By taking on the “hajib” of “respectability” Mr O could practice “Taqiyya” to present himself as a “duly elected” hence authorized) representative of the American citizenry denouncing purportedly anti-Islamic portrayals in the media. At the SAME TIME, he was actually heightening tensions, avoiding reponsibility, hastening war, demeaning Free Speech, Israel, and snubbing his Ineligibility under the noses of the World.
Just ruminations….but in the world of “Taqiyya” O is a real maven.
Or he is just a narcissist with no clue….like Madonna?