If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
IS OBAMA A “CROOK?”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Aug. 8, 2012) — On August 8, 1974, President Richard Milhaus Nixon announced his resignation, stating that he wished to “do that was best for the nation.”
Nixon stated that his “political base in the Congress” was eroded and that he had intended to see the “constitutional process” followed through to its conclusion. “But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe that the constitutional purpose has been served, and there is no longer a need for the process to be prolonged.”
His resignation was prompted by the Watergate investigation, which revealed that he had known about the break-in to the Watergate Hotel, the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. Investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein had doggedly followed the leads to the White House, after which an investigation was begun in the Senate and articles of impeachment drafted by the House Judiciary Committee in July 1974.
Woodward and Bernstein said that “Nixon was far worse than we thought” following the Watergate investigation because Nixon was involved in a “criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice.”
Is Obama a crook?
A ten-month investigation by Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio resulted in two press conferences during which Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse pronounced Obama’s long-form birth certificate a forgery. Probable cause was found that his Selective Service registration form was also a forgery. Selective Service Administration Director Lawrence Romo has told Mike Zullo, lead investigator of the Posse, that Obama’s records are unavailable on microfilm or in hard copy. Arpaio called upon the U.S. Congress to investigate his findings.
Obama has been said to be using a Social Security number which was not assigned to him, but rather, issued to a Connecticut citizen who was born in 1890.
If forgeries have been presented to the public in lieu of authentic documents, why, and who was involved?
It has been suggested by a commenter going by the name of “Unknown” at Mario Apuzzo’s website that Obama is involved in a “first rate criminal intrigue” (see comments at bottom). “Unknown” compared Obama to Nixon when he stated:
There are criminal who look like criminals. And there are those who look like Hollywood movie stars. The latter are a problem. Nixon looked like a crook. But Obama looks like a male model or sports guy.
Where does the evidence lead?