IS OBAMA A “CROOK?”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Aug. 8, 2012) — On August 8, 1974, President Richard Milhaus Nixon announced his resignation, stating that he wished to “do that was best for the nation.”
Nixon stated that his “political base in the Congress” was eroded and that he had intended to see the “constitutional process” followed through to its conclusion. “But with the disappearance of that base, I now believe that the constitutional purpose has been served, and there is no longer a need for the process to be prolonged.”
His resignation was prompted by the Watergate investigation, which revealed that he had known about the break-in to the Watergate Hotel, the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. Investigative reporters Woodward and Bernstein had doggedly followed the leads to the White House, after which an investigation was begun in the Senate and articles of impeachment drafted by the House Judiciary Committee in July 1974.
Woodward and Bernstein said that “Nixon was far worse than we thought” following the Watergate investigation because Nixon was involved in a “criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice.”
Nixon himself had said that the American people “have got to know whether or not their President is a crook.”
Is Obama a crook?
A ten-month investigation by Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio resulted in two press conferences during which Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse pronounced Obama’s long-form birth certificate a forgery. Probable cause was found that his Selective Service registration form was also a forgery. Selective Service Administration Director Lawrence Romo has told Mike Zullo, lead investigator of the Posse, that Obama’s records are unavailable on microfilm or in hard copy. Arpaio called upon the U.S. Congress to investigate his findings.
Obama has been said to be using a Social Security number which was not assigned to him, but rather, issued to a Connecticut citizen who was born in 1890.
If forgeries have been presented to the public in lieu of authentic documents, why, and who was involved?
It has been suggested by a commenter going by the name of “Unknown” at Mario Apuzzo’s website that Obama is involved in a “first rate criminal intrigue” (see comments at bottom). “Unknown” compared Obama to Nixon when he stated:
There are criminal who look like criminals. And there are those who look like Hollywood movie stars. The latter are a problem. Nixon looked like a crook. But Obama looks like a male model or sports guy.
Where does the evidence lead?
The last time I looked, Obama’s name could be Bari Malik Shabazz, son of Malcolm X along with the stolen Social Security number that the mother got for him when she worked for the Social Security in Hawaii. Richard Nixon was one of the most professional and intelligent POTUS the U.S. ever had. He was a good man but was destroyed by people that were jealous of his talent that they knew they would never have. Having a rogue Muslim POTUS seems to be good for America as it has exposed so many greedy and stupid people still willing to kiss his shoes. Knowing that they are still there even if the usurper is voted out will be too much to take realizing that America is still quietly under siege. Hip Hip Hooray for a new POTUS may NOT fix what is wrong here. It goes way beyond rewarding criminal behavior and a Godless generation of lost souls seeking the pot of gold that is empty. I wonder if Tony Rezko and Blago are dancing to “The Jailhouse Rock” or are they mentally counting all the money that was stolen from MF Global, Solyndra, Union Payoffs and Kickbacks and if they are counting their day when they will get out and can light their cigars on all the stolen money that taxpayers slaved for and most who eventually lost their jobs or livelihoods for this collection of human trash that poses as “public trustee’s”?
Where are Woodward and Bernstein when you really need them? We have a Country to save reporters; or maybe all these so-called reporters are only capable of going after Republicans. Nixon at least wasn’t out to destroy America like this foreigner who we know nothing about because he wasn’t properly vetted. Yes, some of you very stupidly elected a President with sealed documents and a totally unknown background – heck we don’t even know his real name now – do we?????.
NO!~The description for this Narcissistic, Self-Centered Egomaniac with Delusions of Grandure, Type-A Personality and God-Tendencies has NOT been defined by Webster!!
Nostradamus said it best: “There will be, at the beginning of the Twenty-First Century a MAN, who will come Upon the World; He will be BLACK of Color, Muslim of FAITH, and forever OMNIPOTENT~HE will cause upon the World great Wars, and Strife~HE IS the “ANTI-CHRIST!!”