Open Letter to White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer

“THE CHOICE IS YOURS”

August 1, 2012

Mr. Daniel Pfeiffer
White House Communications Director
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20500

Dear Mr. Pfeiffer:

Wisely, on Tuesday you chose to apologize to syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer, who on July 27 correctly stated that a bust of Sir Winston Churchill had been returned at Obama’s direction to the British Embassy in Washington, DC.  You had initially called his truthful assertion “ridiculous” and “100% false.”

It is of great concern to this editor that a “White House Communications Director” would not check his facts prior to publishing a scathing indictment against a writer who is well-known to source his statements thoroughly.  Early in 2009, there were numerous mainstream media reports of the Churchill likeness having been returned to the British Embassy and possibly to Great Britain.

I personally have reservations about the authenticity of the photo you presented to prove to Mr. Krauthammer that the bust had been relocated within the White House residence.  It appears highly unlikely that Pete Souza, a highly talented photojournalist and the official White House photographer, would take such an undignified, amateurish photo of two world leaders. Since you have admitted that you were incorrect in your assertions about the bust, might it also be prudent to investigate the origins of the photo?  To my knowledge, although dated July 2010, the photo has not been released before.  You probably are aware that anything can be created on a computer these days.

On April 27, 2011, you vouched for the long-form birth certificate image placed on the White House server and televised representing what Obama claims is his certified birth record.  Your photo appears on all of your White House blog entries, including your posting on the birth certificate image which has been declared “definitely forged” by a county sheriff’s office and adjunct investigative group.  On July 17, 2012, Sheriff Joe Arpaio called upon the U.S. Congress to continue the investigation his office had started last September.

Obama’s Social Security number was issued in the state of Connecticut to a person born in 1890, which means it is stolen.  It is common knowledge that Social Security numbers were historically assigned by “area numbers;” the Social Security Administration says so.  Obama’s Selective Service registration form has been deemed a forgery along with both “birth certificates” issued on the internet, of which a true paper copy with an official registrar’s seal and signature has never been released.

If you continue to affirm that a forgery is real, you could be named as a co-conspirator when the facts are all exposed, just as they were exposed during the Watergate investigation.  The American people know that your boss is a fraud and a criminal.  When will you realize it?

Your Wikipedia biography states that you are only 36 years old.  You have your whole life and career ahead of you if you make the right choices now.  Should you fail to rethink your statements and actions as you did yesterday when you apologized to Mr. Krauthammer, you could spend many years behind bars when all is said and done.

Whether or not Obama was born in Hawaii is no longer the question, but rather, the number of crimes he has committed to enter the White House, the people’s house.

The choice is yours, Mr. Pfeiffer.  You can perform some research and due diligence and discover what millions of Americans already have, or you can keep your head in the sand and be charged as an accomplice to fraud, forgery, and other crimes as a member of the most corrupt White House in United States history.

I hope you make the right decision.

Sincerely yours,

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT  06076
www.thepostemail.com
editor@thepostemail.com