BLOG OWNER SAYS ONE PERSON USES MULTIPLE IDENTITIES
by Sharon Rondeau
(Apr. 7, 2012) — A blog which discusses New Jersey and national politics stated today that one person has been posting comments under multiple screen names.
Today the blog reported on the ballot challenge filed by two New Jersey men and their attorney, Mario Apuzzo, Esq., citing an article posted at Conservative News and Views, also featured as The Post & Email’s Blog of the Day.
Various comments appear below the excerpted post and commentary from Atty. Apuzzo’s website written by “Joe,” “Rick Ambrosia,” “Pete Tempt” and others. In a comment left at 9:10 a.m. today, the blog owner, Art Gallagher, asks for answers to his questions about Obama’s obfuscation of his background, stating, “Maybe Rick, Joe(aka Sam, Bob, Waldo Fred, Louis, Jorge, GOPRedBank2, et al) Pete Tempt and Joey Novak can point out what I’m missing.”
At 9:54 a.m., someone using the name “Not Required” responds, “I can point out what you’re missing. Stupid is as stupid does.”
Gallagher then responds:
Thanks NR, that was helpful.
Maybe it is time that I eliminate the option of commenting anonymously, as Tommy DeSeno has been after me to do.
Or maybe I’ll just edit anonymous comments to include the IP address. It’s not fair that I’m the only one who knows what other identities some of these people post as.
“Not required” is a frequent visitor who posted as “Anna Little” in the April Fools post.
Other identities that “Not required” has used in the past include Dr, Dr, Jackie Kennedy,Seymour Light, Lou Nee Tune, Kathy Baratta, Just the Facts, Eleanor Rigby, and The Truth will set you Free, among others.
Let see the truth set us free.
Commenter “Rick Ambrosia” then says, “posters that hide have something to hide.” Obama has said, “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.” If “Rick Ambrosia” is a synthetic identity, then he is hiding something: his real name.
Cold Case Posse Lead Investigator Mike Zullo has said that a criminal investigation has been opened into why Obama’s long-form birth certificate has been proven to be a forgery.
At 12:08 p.m., Gallagher states that he has “confirmation” that someone posting under the name “Kathy Baratta” has used her email address and computer (which would possess the same IP number) to leave comments under a different name. “Rick Ambrosia” then calls those questioning Obama’s questionable documentation “idiots” and “racists.”
Wasn’t that the technique used during the 2008 election to coerce people to vote for Obama, a virtual unknown who refused to release his records? Is Obama “Unknown?”
“Unknown” has posted on Mario Apuzzo’s blog as well as “The Daily Pen” of “Pen Johansson,” an alleged “constitutional defense lawyer” in Mombosa, Kenya with multiple names.
Pen Johansson never answered our question, “Who are you?”
“Barack Obama,” who are you?
Martha Trowbridge joins the conversation at 2:33 p.m., and at 2:56 p.m., says:
With just a few strokes I have validated your observation. Synthetic identities – likely puppeteered by only one real person.
The extent of internet infiltration of discussions by decent patriotic Americans is staggering. Every single conservative discussion group is riddled with their evil manipulators.
Know them by their vicious attacks, ridicule, insult, shaming, intimidation and threatening.
For years they’ve gotten away with it. We The Decent-Minded had no clue what we were dealing with. We had no model for such behavior.
That’s how they prevented those who sought the Truth from accessing it.
Thanks be to God their m.o. has been smoked out.
Does the method to which Trowbridge refers sound like that of Saul Alinsky? Didn’t Alinsky teach his followers to infiltrate? Did he not recommend making it appear that the numbers were higher than they actually were? Alinsky also said in Rule 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”
Trowbridge had claimed that “Barack Hussein Obama II” is “synthetic identity.” Could that be why his two “birth certificates” have been deemed forgeries?
My own challenge has been to learn the truth and then to discuss it in an open forum. When personally attacked by a troll or other miscreant, I question their actions against me, not on the subject answer, because their answers are invariably distraction and disinformation. I basically call them down for their bad manners and progressive tactics.
By supporting the crimes that are being committed by members of the federal government and the sociopaths working there, the trolls are complicit with the crimes being committed. They are a major and contributing part of our problem.
Nothing defeats fraud and criminal activity like exposure to the light of day. Let’s expose them all.
Authors of evil are precisely the means by which America has been attacked and nearly destroyed. Ascribing to their tactics is ascribing to evil. Period.
Lots of folks avoid reading “Rules for Radical” because they think it is for liberals, which it is, but it contains the rules by which they play the game. Wouldn’t we be more effective “players” if we knew the rules, as well?
Alinsky is my all time favorite evil author!