More on “The People’s Money System”

MAKING THE RECORD CLEARER SO THAT MORE AMERICANS CAN UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS OUR MAJOR PROBLEM TODAY!

by Steven Wayne Pattison ©2011, All Rights Reserved

Was Woodrow Wilson's signature on the Federal Reserve Act constitutional?

(Mar. 18, 2012) — The first article about The People’s Money System was published on December 27, 2011.

Why is the U.S. currency (Federal Reserve Notes) printed by the Federal Reserve Bank, a private company? Can a barter system owned by the People work, and would Americans be better off with it?

This posting is an attempt to fully explain that anything done within the de facto governments, state or Federal, where the Federal government is currently operating as a National Government with total control over all the 50 Union states that may be conceived as good or bad is still de facto, meaning that the banklords do some things to keep enough of the People happy, causing them believe that what they are doing is really making a difference and it is not!

Today it seems as if there are a lot of people wanting to revolt against the de facto, but they don’t understand why they are still losing. They don’t understand the System that was created as the de facto where the People have no ‘Standing’ and no ‘Rights’ within the ‘de facto,’ no matter what they do. This problem of having no ‘Standing’ within the de facto has to be learned because most of the People are wasting their time without this knowledge.  Depending on their actions within the de facto, the de facto could put anyone they wanted in jail except those Americans who understand their ‘Standing’.

There are many examples of this over the last 200 years, of which the main ones are covered in a series titled –

A Time for Choosing, Part I – THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG BANKLORDS, FIAT CURRENCY, AND ECONOMIC HARDSHIP by Steven Wayne Pattison, ©2011 Posted (Nov. 2, 2011)

You are wasting your time if you don’t fully understand what is presented in all of my postings.

President John F. Kennedy’s address before ‘The American Newspaper Publishers Association’ at Waldorf-Astoria Hotel on April 27, 1961:

“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.”

J. Edgar Hoover – The Elks Magazine (August 1956):

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.”

If you have not read all of my postings, then you may be wasting your time and mine on some of the Responses.

If you really want your Country back, you will need to educate yourself so that you are part of the solution. If you don’t fully understand, then you may be playing into the hands of the banklords and actually be part of the problem.

By reading my postings, you will learn the reason for our current situation and how it took place in other countries. Everything you do or see is controlled by the banklords. Therefore, it is very important to know the truth so you don’t quote what someone else has said when they don’t fully understand the de facto compounding our problem.  Not understanding the de facto will lead you down a rabbit hole where the de facto always wins.

Take, for example, within my article titled “The People’s Money System” posted December 27, 2011, in which I referred to Marilyn M. Barnewall’s article,  in which she states, in part:

“Because my career was banking, I have written much about the attack on America’s independent banks by a federal regime that apparently seeks global governance.”

Although Barnewall was a career banker, I do not believe she fully understands what happened, and that was my point for writing this article.  One of the Responses stated, in part:

“So Barnewall uses the BND as an example of the success of a state owned bank.” Source

From the same source – “Think of a State Bank as a mini-Federal Reserve – only it’s State-owned rather than a Federal Reserve Bank.”

The banklords, by the use of the de facto, control all 50 Union states, making them de facto, which means banklords that control the Federal Reserve also control the ‘90-year old Bank of North Dakota”.

What is reported next should provoke some interesting questions. There is success only because it is still owned and controlled by the banklords and is still part of the de facto government.  It may be better than what the other 49 states have, but it is still within the de facto. Is the BND traded on S&P? On BND webpage it reports, “S&P Raises Credit Ratings for Bank of North Dakota”.

Remember:  everything is within the de facto, including the “S&P”.

Can a De jure Union state which is not within the de facto even own a bank?

“In our system, the legislature of a state is the supreme power; in all cases where its action is not restrained by the constitution of the United States.” 12 Wh. 347.

Section 10 Of Article I of the Constitution for the United States of America states:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.”

Does the Bank of North Dakota print its own money or does it use Federal Reserve Notes just like the other 49 Union states do?

Can someone do the research and document that the Bank of North Dakota is Constitutional or unconstitutional?

I am currently working on what will be needed to start our own Banks where no laws would be broken or none of our actions could ever be deemed as being unconstitutional.

All Rights Reserved,

/S/ Steven Pattison

Cell (913) 461-1661 – Skype – steven.wayne.pattison

Other articles posted by Steven Wayne Pattison.

“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” — Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.