If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

Welcome Back!


by Michael D. Jackson

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2005

(Nov. 28, 2011) — The following letter was sent by certified mail, #70110470000241170944, to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, who administered the oath of office to Barack Hussein Obama on January 20, 2009.  Because both Roberts and Obama misspoke, Roberts allegedly repeated the swearing-in the following day, but the event was not publicized for the American people to see.  Since 2008, there have been questions about Obama’s eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in-Chief as put forth in Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution which Roberts’s court and many others have refused to adjudicate.  On May 2, 2011, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral argument from Attys. Gary Kreep and Orly Taitz but has not rendered a decision on Obama’s eligibility.

The letter will also be sent to U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justices Scalia, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas.


Honorable Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.

Supreme Court of the United States

One First Street NE

Washington, DC 20543

Dear Chief Justice Roberts,

It takes an extraordinary circumstance for an average, middle class American to contact your Court once, but this will be my second attempt at bringing to your attention the fact that we have had ongoing since the 2008 presidential election the greatest Constitutional crisis this country has perhaps ever faced, next to the Civil War.  Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, our alleged president, has fraudulently and complicity overtaken the Oval Office.  Mr. Obama/Soetoro is not eligible to be our president according to the U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section I, Clause 5:   “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”  His father Barack Sr. was never a U.S. Citizen, he was born a British Subject and was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948:  (4)”Subject to the provisions of this section, every person born within the United Kingdom and Colonies after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by birth: (5)Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth ….”  Under the British Nationality Act of 1948, Obama’s father became a British citizen under Section 4 by being born on the soil of an English Colony, Kenya. Under Section 5, when Obama was born in 1961 in Hawaii or some other place, he automatically became a British citizen by descent from his father who was a British citizen under Section 4.  These are irrefutable facts and cannot be denied.  There is U.S. Supreme Court precedent regarding the Natural Born Citizenship clause in our U.S. Constitution.  This can be found in the ruling Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875).

Honorable Chief Justice, I’m sure you recall approximately two and one half years ago, a very courageous woman drove all the way from southern California in the early hours of the morning to hear you speak and possibly have the great honor and privilege to be called upon to ask your Honor a question and share her great concern for the peril and danger facing our country because we have a Constitutionally unqualified person getting ready to take occupation of the White House and be Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces. This woman’s name was Attorney/Dr. Orly Taitz.  She was by God’s marvelous grace called upon to share her concern with you when you were at the University of Idaho, I believe approximately on March 14, 2009.  Here is the link to the video clip of that very moment.  http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=28297  Chief Justice Roberts, evidence of great felonious crimes were presented to you, along with well over 300,000 petitions from the American people for you to not allow a usurper to occupy the White House and stand up for the U.S. Constitution that you swore an allegiance to.  May I share a quote with you most Honorable Chief Justice, from our country’s first Supreme Court Chief Justice John Jay to George Washington on 25 July 1787 “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

May I implore the Chief Justice, I am also greatly concerned that sometime in January of 2009, eight of the nine Supreme Court Justices met behind closed doors with Mr. Obama/Soetoro.  Even if nothing was shared that was questionable, it appears before the American people and the electorate as if the Supreme Court of the United States has been tainted with impropriety or inappropriate influence. “We The People” should expect there to be jurisprudence shown at the highest level.  Here is a link to the secret meeting in which I refer to: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=86863 .

Currently the U.S. Supreme Court has two Justices appointed by Mr. Obama, but due to his unlawfulness, committed against our U.S. Constitution, how can they have jurisdiction to make any rulings?  Most honorable Justice, may I implore the Court that there is great likelihood you will have brought before you other cases concerning Mr. Obama’s ineligible and unlawful occupation of the White House.  May the Lord grant you the wisdom and understanding Chief Justice Roberts, to judge in righteousness, courage and honor.  Due to the unlawful action(s) of the occupant in our White House the two Chief Justices, Miss Kagan, and Miss Sotomayor, if not Constitutionally removed from the Court, must recuse themselves to remove any appearance of impropriety in the event your Court needs to make a Constitutional decision on the adherence to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of our U.S. Constitution.   You must demand that the law is adhered to, and enforce such judicial law, that unless the two Chief Justices Mr. Obama/Soetoro appointed are removed, they must recuse themselves if a case regarding Mr. Obama/Soetoro’s unconstitutional occupation  of the office of the presidency is brought before the Court.

Since May 2, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to render a decision on oral arguments presented by Attorney Taitz regarding Mr. Obama/Soetoro’s occupation of our White House.  I don’t know the time period for a Court to decide on a case, but more than six months has gone by and no ruling.  It comes across with the appearance of stonewalling and fearfulness.  Since Attorney Taitz was able to present to you back in March 2009, the evidence of Mr. Obama’s crimes and the cover-up of those crimes continues to grow and our country becomes that much more in peril.

In closing, most honorable Chief Justice, truth and justice must be upheld.  We are a nation built upon laws. You know as well as I, our founding fathers escaped tyranny.  We now have tyranny making a blatant and purposeful attack upon the very liberties on which we were founded.  Our country’s framers had it right and we as a people need to return back to the ancient landmarks which our father’s laid and stop removing them. Please, Chief Justice, honor your oath in which you swore. According to Title 28, Chapter I, Part 453 of the United States Code, each Supreme Court Justice takes the following oath: “I, [NAME], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as [TITLE] under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Please, Chief Justice Roberts, do not ignore this great peril that our country faces with this Constitutional crisis of having an unlawful, and not yet legally identified person occupying our Oval Office.  The time for sweeping it under the rug has come to pass.  The truth must be upheld in this in order for our country to survive.  This is a great duty, responsibility, and burden, for you to lawfully fulfill.

 For Christ and Country and Most Respectfully,

Michael Jackson

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. We judge judges and other politicians by their broken spoken English of lack there of as being foreigners and even foreign spies or True Americans.

    John Roberts, not a likely name but a made-up name, was appointed by Bush II to the highest US judicial post even though he had but three years of judicial experience on the appelate court in DC. Thus you need his birth certificate to judge him ‘honorable’ or ‘respectable’.

    Analysis of a Google transcript, ‘John Roberts transcript’ (or George HW Bush transcript, George W Bush transcript, Hillary Clinton transcript, Bill Clinton transcript, etc.) shows Roberts extreme difficulty with the English language, considered to be the most difficult to learn of all languages. Happily that makes it easy to find German spies!

    Bush II born of foreign parents might have a US birth certificate but no matter as his parents are German citizens. Still Bush has a major problem with the English language.

  2. Mr. Jackson,
    This is a well composed letter but may I be allowed one correction without sounding critical.
    There is but one “Chief Justice” seated on the Supreme Court of the United States at any given time, that currently being Chief Justice John Roberts. The rest (of the Justices) are referred to as “Associate Justices”. Just an FYI in case you plan further correspondence to the Court.
    Keep up the good fight.

  3. Sadly, no mail gets to SCOTUS judges. It mail all filtered by the court clerks, if it even gets to the court building.

    There basically is no way to communicate with anyone in the feral government directly unless they travel to some place where you can see them and talk with them directly (as Orly Taitz was able to do a couple of years ago).

    Having said that, have the states do something like pass SB 1070, and they all hear about it. The states are the solution to the federal problem, but sadly, many of them are as corrupt and complicit with our destruction as the feds are, and they are doing precious little to stop the lawlessness in Washington.

  4. Mr. Jackson, yours was a noble and patriotic attempt to secure our rights as guaranteed under the constitution, but doomed to fail. The justices of the Supreme Court proved long ago that they have no intention of upholding the document which forms the basis of our republic.

    We differ in one respect, sir, for you close your letter with the words “Most Respectfully.” I greatly fear the powers held by the SCOTUS, but I no longer revere or honor the men and women who make up that body, and will not do so again until they uphold their sworn duties as guardians of the law and our constitution. By acting as they have and refusing to hear cases challening Obama, they have shown themselves to be nothing more than cowards and traitors unsuited to the high office with which they have been entrusted.