Update: Elections Complaint Against Obama to be Heard in New Hampshire on November 18

FROM ORLY TAITZ, ESQ.

by Sharon Rondeau

The New Hampshire State Seal displays the frigate "Raleigh," which was built in 1776

(Nov. 16, 2011) — The Post & Email has just spoken with Atty. Orly Taitz, who has been told by the secretary of the New Hampshire Election Board that her complaint filed on Monday will have a hearing on Friday, November 18, 2011 in Concord at 2:00 p.m. The hearing is open to the public.

The street address is 33 North State Street, Concord, NH  03301, Room 307.  The Legislative Office Building is located behind the State House.

Taitz posted the news on her website just prior to contacting The Post & Email.

The website of the New Hampshire Attorney General states that written complaints must be acted upon within 90 days of receipt and that “Federal complaints receive priority because of the time deadline imposed by Federal law.”  The blank complaint form is here.

Taitz did not know if Obama or his representative will be attending the hearing.  New Hampshire State Representative Harry Accornero has informed Taitz that he will be present on Friday when, as Taitz was informed, a five-member panel will evaluate “whether to keep Obama off the ballot in NH.”

It is Taitz’s understanding that there will not be a time limit imposed by the Elections Board for her to air her complaint, which alleges that the birth certificate Obama presented to the public on April 27, 2011 is fraudulent and that he is using a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut which was never assigned to him.

Taitz stated that she would appreciate any frequent flyer miles which people could donate as well as funds for a rental car.  As a matter of course, she takes the “red-eye” to save money while flying. She is uncertain whether she will return to California on Friday evening after the hearing or stay overnight in New Hampshire.  She stated, “I would greatly appreciate, if as many supporters as possible come to the hearing. Also, all the travel is extremely expensive. every trip of just 2 days travel costs me about $1,000, which includes airplane tickets, car rental, one night hotel. That does not take into account all of the days of missed work, so I really need your support in donations and in frequent flier miles and hotel and car rental points.”

The Post & Email will inquire as to whether or not the hearing may be audio- or video-recorded.

New Hampshire was the first American colony to declare its independence from Great Britain in 1776.  It possesses “one of the largest representative bodies in the English-speaking world, with 24 senators and 400 representatives.”

Some have characterized Taitz’s complaint as taking advantage of a “loophole” in New Hampshire election laws because it “allows anyone to challenge a candidate on the ballot. You do not have to be a resident of NH.”  Taitz is calling for citizens to complete complaint forms and fax them to 603-271-6316.

Update, November 17, 2011:  The Post & Email has confirmed via Orly Taitz’s website and a statement directly from New Hampshire Rep. Laurence Rappaport that he has joined Tatiz’s election complaint and will be present at the hearing on Friday, November 18.

Letter from Rep. Harry Accornero to Orly Taitz asking to join her elections complaint against Barack Hussein Obama in New Hampshire

Notice of Hearing on Friday, November 18, 2011, including Orly TaItz's election complaint against Obama

5 Responses to "Update: Elections Complaint Against Obama to be Heard in New Hampshire on November 18"

  1. A pen   Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 9:11 PM

    I wonder if the state of NH will be arresting attendees like TN?

  2. Charlie Resseguie   Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 7:49 PM

    With all of the deceit and terrible things our country is going thru,my prayers have been and will be with Orly.

  3. Hotlanta Mike   Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM

    It should be that a candidate has to prove to the election board that they are eligible to be on the ballot before being placed on the ballot.

    ————————————————————

    Hey Birdy, it should also be that a voter needs to have properly registered and then provide authorized id to cast a vote…but then when does logic prevail in politics?

  4. birdy   Thursday, November 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM

    It should be that a candidate has to prove to the election board that they are eligible to be on the ballot before being placed on the ballot. It should not be up to a challenger to prove that they are not eligible. A challenger should only be required to point out that the candidate has not supplied sufficient documentation to prove that they are eligible.

    I hope Dr. Taitz isn’t held to a higher standard where she has to prove to the election board that Obama is not eligible. The board should require that each candidate provide enough evidence to convince reasonable people that they are eligible. Perhaps a candidate’s word is sufficient until challenged. Then, if challenged, the candidate has to come up with actual documentary evidence to back their word up.

    We’ll see how this turns out; if the board of elections treats Obama as just another candidate (like Roger Calero) or if they protect Obama with special treatment in a show of political bias and corruption.

  5. MacPUBLIUS   Wednesday, November 16, 2011 at 11:36 PM

    Some have characterized Taitz’s complaint as taking advantage of a “loophole” in New Hampshire election laws because it “allows anyone to challenge a candidate on the ballot. You do not have to be a resident of NH.”

    Wouldn’t it be ironic if the fraud, liar, thief, usurper and treasonist-in-chief along with his entire crew got to swing from a “loop hole” someday because of this loophole and the good people of NH?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.