STILL, ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES DO NOTHING
by Millard Blanchard
October 3, 2011
This is the fifth in a series of challenges, same subject, to the north Georgia Representatives. No response has ever been received; none is expected. However we all have high hopes of sending some of them down the road in 2012.
Representative Graves, by FAX:
We are (or were) a Nation of Laws. Those laws that are not inalienable come from our Constitution. The Constitution of the United States has no caveats; no sometimes we do and sometimes we don’t. The Constitution says what it means and means what it says. And it served us well, into the 20th century.
So here we have a POTUS who orders the assassination of a U. S. citizen contrary to the 5th Amendment’s mandate of due process of law. We are not a nation of laws of man but rather laws from our Constitution. I have been branded a potential domestic terrorist by DHS. Am I next for assassination? Where does it stop?
The war on the Arabian Peninsula continues irrespective of it not being authorized by congress, most recently by committing a drone to a suicide mission in Somalia. We now wage unconstitutional wars by crashing our aircraft into civilian enclaves? How barbaric can that be? We have become a rogue nation, killing on orders of a dictator in charge. Only Congress may declare war. Drones are flying in the U. S. When will they start dropping bombs here?
And that usurper in charge has formed a shadow government of his personally appointed czars to conduct all this depravity outside of and in defiance of the established government. Crimes against the Constitution of the United States and levying War against them are acts of treason.
I can only assume by your continued complacency that you condone this action. What else is a constituent to think other than you like the status quo because you sense it will be your turn after the next election and you wish to retain this power? What I know is that some of you are already marked for primary competition and what I hope is that each and every one of you will not be returned to the swamp in 2012 to enjoy your new found power.
For the Republic,
M. J. Blanchard
cc: GOP 9th District,
media,
grassroots
Representatives Broun, Gingrey, Scott, Woodall
In addition to the historical accuracy of comment above it also raises complex issues,
for example the breach of fiscal policy. Since national debt is incurred by government but must be authorized via CONgress. Constitutional adherence is voided on both sides of the coin (figuratively as US CORP and United States of America)
However, what is now interesting by assassinating al-‘Awlaqī; on foreign soil raises a huge problem for barry’s commitment to close GITMO. Foreign terrorists on US base on foreign soil with stronger evidence of terrorism than online jihad instruction that al-‘Awlaqī; was charged with, will not have a favorable outcome no matter how DoJ presents the case. In addition, what will all the liberal lawyers now do? Call for impeachment against barry soetero. Killing a citizen as an illegal putative POTUS should pretty much put him for life, plus add the charges for fraud, forgery, falsified filings as DNC candidate. Oh, forgot treason, perjured oath, and willful intent to defraud.
The United States exists in two forms: The original United States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had very little authority.
The original United States has been usurped by a separate and different UNITED STATES formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the UNITED STATES CORPORATION) that acts as our current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law.
The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”