Atty. Orly Taitz Reports Live From Hawaii

HOW LONG WILL HAWAII OFFICIALS BE ABLE TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE?

by Sharon Rondeau

Dr. Orly Taitz was denied access to Obama's original birth record in defiance of a federal subpoena issued last month

(Aug. 9, 2011) — The Post & Email spoke with Atty. Orly Taitz today at approximately 11:30 a.m. EDT/5:30 a.m. Hawaii time.  Taitz is in Hawaii following her attempt to view the original birth document allegedly on file with the Hawaii Department of Health which had been under subpoena for examination by the U.S. District Court in Honolulu with a deadline of August 8.  We asked Taitz about yesterday’s events why she was unable to see Obama’s birth record.

Taitz has conducted several interviews with various news outlets since her appearance at the Hawaii Health Department and the U.S. District Court following the DOH’s non-compliance with the subpoena.  A very short story written by a reporter at KHON2 told Taitz that he had been “assigned me another story today so your interview will not have as much air time.”

The original birth record of Barack Hussein Obama was sought as part of the discovery process in the lawsuit Taitz v. Astrue, which had requested a copy of the original application completed by the person who was allegedly assigned the social security number which Obama is currently using.  Taitz has reported that the work of two private investigators has revealed that the number was issued in the state of Connecticut to a person born in 1890.

Taitz stated that when she arrived at the Department of Health, she was presented with a letter dated July 8, 2011 denying her access to the original birth certificate.  Taitz described that which transpired as follows:

We arrived there, and they had two people waiting for us.  One was an attorney from the Attorney General’s office and the one person represented the Health Department by the name of Keith Yamamoto.  They gave me a letter which was written by the Deputy Attorney General of Hawaii, Jill Nagamine.  She said that they would not allow us inspection of the original because of privacy concerns.  The letter from Nagamine was dated July 8.

First of all, any opposition to a subpoena has to be made in a proper form.  They should have filed a form in federal court in Hawaii or in the original case in Washington, DC, and they did not do it.  They provided their opposition on the day I arrived with my experts, which is an outrage of behavior by government officials.  I have called and left multiple messages for AG Nagamine, and I wrote emails to her, Fedexed letters to Loretta Fuddy stating that it will cost thousands of dollars for my experts and me to have to fly from different states.  I was flying from California; somebody else from Florida, and somebody else from Washington State, and they’re citing “privacy.”  This is an insult to the intelligence of every American.   It’s on www.whitehouse.gov.  It’s not privacy; it’s forgery.

If they had known that they were not going to cooperate with a federal subpoena, they had to advise us timely.  They had two weeks to file a proper motion.  This is a continuation of the same arrogant, obnoxious behavior of the government officials in Hawaii and the Obama regime.  They’re just criminally complicit in this cover-up.

The Post & Email then asked, “Is Jill Nagamine breaking state or federal law by not complying or not filing an objection within the two-week period?

She’s representing Loretta Fuddy, and Loretta Fuddy is violating federal law.  According to Rule 45, which deals with federal subpoenas, if they knew that they were not willing to comply with the subpoena, they had to file a proper objection within two weeks, and they did not do so.  Now we will have a hearing in front of a federal judge where the director of health has to appear and explain why she is not complying with a federal subpoena, why she is not allowing inspection of the birth certificate, claiming “privacy” after Obama has already posted it and waived all of his privacy rights.

I have forwarded to them affidavits from experts saying what Obama posted on the www.whitehouse.gov website is a clear forgery from the different typesettings, from different documents, created on a computer with computer graphics.  Obama’s mother’s signature is a computer graphic; it’s not a written signature in ink.  It is so outrageous.  All of these people should be in prison for what they’re doing.

Would you say that the hearing on September 14 is a reasonable decision?  I noticed in your three-page motion that you had asked for a bench warrant for Fuddy’s arrest.

It’s up to the judge to decide, but I don’t think that a federal judge in Hawaii will go as far as to arrest a high-ranking official.  If it had been anybody else, a bench warrant would have been issued and the person arrested.  But because it’s a high-ranking state official, I guess, they’re not going to issue a bench warrant and they haven’t arrested her.  We’ll see what the judge is going to do.  If he decides that privacy was waived and she needs to comply with the subpoena, he will issue an order to comply with the subpoena, and if she does not comply, then I will have to file a motion for contempt of court or ask for a bench warrant.

If he does not grant the motion to comply, then I will have to go to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which is already dealing with Obama’s case which was filed in California.  They’ve been sitting on that since May 2, over three and one-half months.  Then they’ll have to decide on both cases.

Do you suspect that the Hawaii Department of Health has nothing on Obama?

I’m guessing that they filed in their records the computer-generated garbage that Obama posted as a certified copy of his original.  I’m suspecting that they did not have an original hand-signed birth certificate.  It’s a computer-generated graphic.  So that’s what they have on file.  I think they were determined to have a liberal Democrat in office regardless of how many crimes he may have committed and how complicit they are.

Does the September 14 hearing give Fuddy and Nagamine time to prepare a defense or hire an outside law firm?

Their defense is “privacy,” that it’s his birth certificate and he did not authorize inspection.  I think it’s time for people to start calling Donald Trump again and all of the elected and appointed officials to bring this issue to the forefront, because if Obama claims that the document is not forged, why wouldn’t he then sign a release and allow the experts to inspect what is there?

Obama’s attorney, Judith Corley, said that it was a certified copy, so one wouldn’t think there would be any problem.

Yes, but of course, they knew that it’s garbage.  They know that both copies that were presented on green safety paper and white paper were computer-generated and not a real birth certificate.  They are all complicit:  Robert Bauer, Judith Corley, Loretta Fuddy, Registrar Alvin T. Onaka – these people all need to be prosecuted.  Even Assistant Attorney General Jill Nagamine knows that a crime has been committed and is complicit in misprision of felony.  She is part of this criminal enterprise that has taken over this nation.  It’s like the Mafia.

Do you know anything about the judges who will be overseeing the hearing on the 14th?

They are Susan Oki Mollway, chief judge of the District of Hawaii, and Magistrate Richard Puglisi.

———————-

Editor’s Note:  Previous coverage by The Post & Email of Hawaii Assistant Attorney General Jill Nagamine here revealed that early in 2010, then-Hawaii Attorney General Mark Bennett and his deputy, Jill T. Nagamine, refused to corroborate then-Health Department Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino’s public statement that Barack Hussein Obama was a “natural-born American citizen.”  Nagamine had denied “that the AG office has ever mentioned the term “natural born citizen” in an opinion or policy.”