Which GOP Candidates Really Care About the Constitution?

ASK THEM JUST ONE QUESTION

by JB Williams

Herman Cain recently announced his bid for president in 2012. Other likely contenders such as Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty have been identified.

(May 27, 2011) — What issue takes precedence over a known fraud in the White House and all of the kingmakers who made it possible? If Article II of the U.S. Constitution means nothing to a GOP candidate at this late date, after the issuance of two forged Obama documents, what else in the Constitution do they care about?

And if a GOP candidate is not willing to take on the most important question of the era, who is the fraud in the White House, how did he get there and how do we make sure that this can never happen again, why would there be a second question for that candidate?

For over two years now, a mountain of evidence has been collected and released on the Internet proving numerous ways that Barack Hussein Obama is not a “natural born citizen” eligible for the office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Every member of congress knows it and so does every member of the U.S. Supreme Court. But nobody, not even the newly elected Tea Party candidates of 2010 have raised a finger to do anything about it. The precedent stands, anyone from anywhere, loyal to foreign entities can be President of the United States now, without even having to provide the basic background information that is required every day in low level jobs across the country and around the globe.

Obama could never pass a standard FBI background check or high level security clearance. Yet, if this issue is not addressed, the precedence has been established. Anyone, loyal to any foreign entity, can be president and nobody can even question that individual.

If GOP candidates are not willing to take on this most vital issue to the future of freedom, liberty, decency, transparency and constitutional self-governance, what else should voters count on those candidates to do on behalf of the people?

Which of the potential 2012 GOP candidates cares about Article II?

Herman Cain – NO

Newt Gingrich – NO

Ron Paul – NO

Tim Pawlenty – NO

Mitt Romney – NO

Rick Santorum – NO

Michele Bachmann – NO

John Bolton – NO

Lindsey Graham – NO

Sarah Palin – NO

Jeb Bush – NO

Chris Christie – NO

Jim DeMint – NO

Bob McDonald – NO

How many of these people even know the true definition of natural born citizen? If they don’t know it, how much do they really care about the Constitution?

  • natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
  • As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
  • The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;
  • in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Should anyone who does not know this basic information be trusted to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States? Should people who do not care about Article II of the Constitution be trusted to care about any other part of the Constitution?

If the Tea Party accomplished nothing else, it did accomplish putting the U.S. Constitution back on the table for debate. By the 2010 election cycle, even Nancy Pelosi was mumbling Tea Party talking points as she tried to stop the Republican tsunami that stripped her of her gavel.

But talking about the Constitution and actually acting to uphold and defend the Constitution are two very different things. If the people elected in 2010 and 2012 won’t ACT to protect the Constitution, all of the flowery rhetoric about the Constitution is meaningless. And if they won’t uphold Article II, which parts of the Constitution should we expect them to uphold?

Obama and his media minions told the world that he released his birth certificate back in 2009. That was proven to be an outright lie when he released another birth certificate, different from the first, in May of 2011, under increasing public pressure from business mogul Donald Trump.

Like everyone else above a 3rd grade education with an interest in truth, Trump has figured out that the second White House birth certificate is also a forgery. Surely the GOP candidates are smart enough to figure this out too, and if they aren’t, are they smart enough to be president of the United States at a time when we really need a real president?

Each American must find their own path here, choose what is most important to them and make their decisions on that basis.

As for me, the U.S. Constitution really does come first, and if a candidate is not willing to uphold Article II, then I do not believe they will be willing to uphold any other part of those principles and values.

In the 2012 GOP primaries, I have only one question for each candidate…

Dear candidate – What do YOU intend to do about the fraud in the White House and the utter intentional destruction of the U.S. Constitution, our economic systems and our way of life under their criminally evil assault on all things American?

If you don’t answer that question correctly, I have no second question for you! I stand for the Constitution, including Article II. If you don’t, I’m not interested…

Until we have a candidate who cares about Article II, we DO NOT have a candidate who cares about the constitution! That’s simply unacceptable!

 

29 Responses to "Which GOP Candidates Really Care About the Constitution?"

  1. Charlie Resseguie   Monday, May 30, 2011 at 2:40 PM

    Note for JB,
    There has been an email thread goin around which basically started on the
    GiveUsLiberty1776.blogspot.com site. JB, I have seen many of your great comments on it. A lady named Kathy has started drafting a letter which she is calling: “Citizens Demand For Justice”
    In it she is writing down every point and way our current administration and leadership
    is and has done wrong Constitutionally and legally.
    The letter or petition will be circulated to get as many American Patriots to sign and unite with it in purpose and intent. With the vast amount of people who we all know will agree with this,it will force our government to bring these to justice.
    JB, could you contact her please,to possibly assist her? Others of our group will help in what ever way we can also.
    I am asking anyone who would like to be involved in this effort,please let me know too,
    I’m going to get as many tea party groups[nationally] behind this as well as other likeminded patriotic groups. Thank you all! Charlie Resseguie
    countrycousinsmusic@yahoo.com

  2. Cody Judy   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 10:32 PM

    JB is a great writer and I have had personal debate with him over the “natural born citizen” qualifications of Sen. John McCain. To be the nay sayer of the comment considerations, to understand the “pass” Republican candidates give Obama, is to understand Sen Res. 511 which was non-binding, pushed by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
    I think a great question to consider here is “How can your ‘Natural Born Citizen’ qualifications be lost because with many in Congress its all about giving that status somehow defying nature, and the natural yearnings that come from ones birth place.

    As the only candidate in the 2008 Class who ran for President to sue Sen. John McCain and Barack Obama on that very issue, my question is how could you support Sarah Palin or any of the candidates mentioned who sat around and did nothing?

    The next question- How many people will donate to my campaign in 2012 so I can enter the race as a Republican and give them all something to think about? If you can’t put a few dollars to your resolute and convictions, then your all a bunch of talk anyway right?

    Something to think about but anyone able to run on the R. ticket who can raise the issue has to be able to get to the debates and have a little support. My name is Cody Robert Judy and I am prepareing to enter the race, and I think I’m gonna do it as a Republican because if conservatives can’t clean their own house because of the fear of splitting the vote, nothing anyone said here really matters anyway.

    If that single issue is so important to you all, your support would be greatly appreciated because last time I did this in 2008, I footed the bill believing my time, talents, and fortunes were worth defending America. I think half the time Americans want some fat rich cat to do all the campaigning when the truth is the small donations of Americans who believe in this issue really could move the mountain!

    Its time a few Americans who believe in this issue got behind someone whose been there the whole time, otherwise your supporting a candidate who says they will handle the issue with no back ground on it. That’s pathetic lip service for your dollars, rather than the conviction you seek I believe.

    Cody Robert Judy
    YouTube CODE4PRES
    http://www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

  3. Sovereign Soul   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 5:31 PM

    Congrfessman, Dr. Ron Paul, “Mr. Constitution” himself, as a member of the111th Congrgress, knowing that aka Obama had a British Citizen/Subject as a father was therefore CONSTITUTIONALLY UNQUALIFIED to be POTUS — and he did NOTHING to author legislation to disqualify the CANDIDATE aka Obama! From what I’ve read here and other blogs, (GiveUsLiberty1776.blogspot.com and drkatesview.com, etc.), this FAILURE TO ACT constitutes Misprison — a felony! Thus, ALL members of the 112th Congress, now knowing of the substantial evidence that aka is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, are also guilty of Misprison and the betrayal of their Oath of Office by their silent acceptance of his claim of legitimacy.

  4. MacPUBLIUS   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM

    RSA,
    (1) Where in the Constitution does it say that the President has the authority to use our military force against another nation state after consulting only the UN? Note: Libya does not meet the criteria of the War Powers Act. (2) Yes, himself and/or his handler(s).
    His stint as President of the UN Security Council in 2009 was only temporary, but it was an opportunity to trample the Constitution that he and Rahm didn’t want to pass up. Obama’s agenda is very clear, usurp the Constitution at every opportunity and render it impotent and useless in his quest to “fundamentally change” America. His treason has no boundaries.

  5. Lloyd in California   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 12:25 PM

    Boy do I agree with you on Palin. Just look at the attention Trump got with the issue. Any candidate that can’t see that as an advantage doesn’t need to be running.

  6. Lloyd in California   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 12:14 PM

    JB, what a great article. I used it to create a letter that I am going to send to every candidate and to some elected representatives. I hope you are in agreement. If you have objections please let me know. Here it is.

    Dear _______________,
    I am a registered Independent mostly libertarian in my views towards government. The pundits say the Independents are mostly for Obama, don’t you believe them. I am reregistering in the Republican Party so I can vote for a candidate who will answer one simple question. If you will not take on the most important question of my lifetime why would I support let alone vote for you to become the candidate? I am tired of voting for the lesser of two evils and I suspect so are the rest of Americans.
    Every member of Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court knows about the mountain of evidence that has been collected but has done nothing to answer the question, “Is the person elected in 2008 a Natural Born Citizen therefore qualified to be President of the United States of America and Commander in Chief of our armed forces?” The Constitution does not say Native Born or Naturalized Citizen.
    I said the question is simple but before you answer you have to have read and understood what the U.S. Constitution says. If Article II means nothing to you after we have seen the forged documents and all the questions concerning identity remain unanswered, what else in the Constitution do you care about?
    My question is: Who is fraud in the White House, how did he get there and what do YOU intend to do if elected to stop the utter destruction of the U.S. Constitution, our economic systems and our way of life under his criminally evil assault on all things American?

    If you don’t answer my question correctly, I have no second question for you! I stand for the Constitution, including Article II. If you don’t, I’m not interested…

    Any unwillingness on your part to take on this most vital issue to the future of freedom, liberty, decency, transparency and constitutional self-governance, what else should voters count on you to do on our behalf? As you ponder your answer I give you the following:
    You and how many of your opponents even know the true definition of natural born citizen? If you don’t know it, how much do you really care about the Constitution?

    • natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.
    • As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens,
    those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
    • The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children;
    • in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen;
    for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

    Should anyone who does not know this basic information be trusted to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States? Should people who do not care about Article II of the Constitution be trusted to care about any other part of the Constitution?

    Talking about the Constitution, talking about your oath and actually acting to uphold and defend the Constitution are two very different things. If you and the people elected in 2010 and 2012 won’t ACT to protect the Constitution, all of the flowery rhetoric about the Constitution is meaningless. And if they won’t uphold Article II, which parts of the Constitution should we expect them to uphold?

    America awaits your answer.

  7. TruthSeeker   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM

    Great article, JB, and I hope a good rallying cry for all of us!

    Somehow, some way, the message of this article needs to find its way into, and take root in every American, regardless of political affiliation.

    The issue must be depoliticized and presented to the people in a way that all Americans, regardless of their politics, can see the dangers ahead for the nation if this usurpation of the Constitution is allowed to go unchecked and uncorrected.

    I’ll confess up front that I don’t see how it’s possible, but I do feel that unless we can get enough Democrats and Independents engaged on this issue, it’s hopeless. Perhaps showing proof (which is a technical rather than political matter) that BHO’s ‘birth certificate’ is a fake is the best way to do this.

    The two focal points of “what is a natural born citizen” and “the forgery or faking of a birth certificate for the purpose of establishing eligibility to be President of the United States” should be our rallying cry.

    The myriad amount of proof that has already been demonstrated clearly shows that the documents which the Usurper has presented to the public as evidence of his eligibility are, indeed, fake. This SHOULD BE an affront to everyone who really cherishes freedom and liberty regardless of individual political views.

    The ramifications of a usurper in the highest seat of power in our nation, especially one with possible or likely allegiances to foreign entities or causes, is just as dangerous and destructive whether he/she be a Republican OR a Democrat! MacPublius, in his comments, does an excellent job discussing such matters.

  8. Johnson   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 11:06 AM

    Donna is Right 100%

  9. RacerJim   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 9:39 AM

    Hey potential 2012 GOP candidates: Can you hear “We the people…” now?

  10. RSA9999   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 9:32 AM

    Mac, wasn’t it the UN security council that agreed that he should attack Libya? He’s now taking orders from himself?

  11. A pen   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 9:07 AM

    Under the circumstances, that the omnipotent and omnipresent media control public opinion, it is strategic to veil the answer to JB’s question. It is up to the best interpretation of the candidates position based on their understanding of the principles enshrined in the founding documents which may be answered facetiously in order to attain that office from which a proper assault upon treason can be waged. It is up to us to do our best to aid in the promotion of the individual best tempered to perform the task given the opportunity. To evade the enemy one must match wits with him and gain the high ground without him knowing, just as what was done in commission of the usurpation. Our choice must not be determined by exposing the will but in evading it being a detriment.

  12. NUTN2SAY   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM

    Has he yet to acknowledge just even the existence of people like us who are saying the U.S. Constitution has been violated with the usurper in the White House? Let me guess…..he has not.

  13. MacPUBLIUS   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 5:20 AM

    An even bigger problem exists with the usurper establishing precedence that virtually anyone can be POTUS, i.e., who is really commanding our armed forces and to whom or what is his or her allegiance? It’s not just the greatest Constitutional crisis in our nation’s history, it is also the greatest threat to our national security in our lifetime and a nuclear surety threat of the highest order. That is what the question Lt Col Lakin was asking was all about and I am dumbfounded that other military officers and leaders are not asking the same question and raising hell.
    Consider this; in September 2009 Obama presided over the U.N. Security Council in an “unpresidented” (intentionally misspelled) move. So who was his allegiance to at that time, the United Nations or the United States of America? IMO, the United States was leaderless and Obama betrayed the nation. No, he doesn’t get to wear two or more hats while he is POTUS!
    How about Libya? If Obama doesn’t need congressional approval to commit forces and can unilaterally declare war on Libya, what’s to stop him from also using a nuclear weapon because he deems it necessary? Will the military suddenly say, sorry boss, you can’t do that? Essentially he has unbridled authority to do whatever he wants. We are living in a dictatorship folks. This is a national security nightmare of mega proportions and it must be brought to a halt immediately.
    Great article JB, I just had to add my thoughts on the national security aspect because I believe we are living in epic times that are extraordinarily dangerous. In my view, America has become the apex of evil under the Obama administration.

  14. Charles1934   Saturday, May 28, 2011 at 2:42 AM

    No.1 problem is the mass media which protects Obama from the eligibility issue.

    But why would Fox News join hand with the leftist CNN and MSNBC in this issue? Why have Palin and Bachmann changed their rhetorics in TV interviews in the last 5 months from “Americans are asking a legitimate question” to “let’s not get distracted from more important issues”? Why did Hannity happily interview Trump 2 months ago on the issue of Obama eligibility but cancelled in a rush his interview with Dr. Corsi about his new book “Where is the birth certificate?” I don’t believe it’s because of the pressure from the White House. I rather believe Ailes got notice from the “advisor” which the new Comitern had planted there.

    No.2 problem is the Republican Party establishment which is also under the influence of the new Comitern which has politicians and businessmen bought by “being your factory and owning your bonds.”

    Both Dems and Rinos are working for the same boss across the ocean.

  15. RSA9999   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 11:37 PM

    JB, this is an excellent article! You must have read my thoughts and put them in writing. I have told campaign callers in no uncertain words that if they do not address that ONE problem, not only will no other problem be solved but they are good for nothing and my money will remain in my pocket for that one soul who will not only campaign on this issue but follow through when they are in office. It is an outright lie for any politician to claim that they don’t know for sure or they believe what they’ve been told. The words they are actually shouting from the highest mountains are, “I’m a yellow bellied moron but never mind that, give me your money so I can make you a miserable slave.”

    If there is anyone out there who doesn’t believe that evil triumphs when good folk DO nothing, look at the world around you. This is the last of the best nations but VERY VERY vulnerable to failure. Bush gave us a taste of slavery but this slimy sham in DC has given us a front row view of the enormity of the enemy. They already feel quite comfortable just ignoring every attempt to correct our course in a civilized manner. They are not afraid of us and I believe that is called tyranny. I also happen to believe that the elegant, avant garde voting machines are a gift from Chavez to the new world order. We are no longer going to be toast, we already are. All that’s left is to watch the slow decline into hell. I am so sure of it that I no longer keep my money in a bank.

  16. Kevin J. Lankford   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 10:47 PM

    As I listen to the discussions on t.v. and radio about who is the most viable republican
    candidate who can out perform obama in the next election I am overcome with disgust.
    These talking heads, (bobble heads), who claim to be so well informed and on top of
    all current events so casually refer to obama as president it makes my blood boil.

    I do not believe anyone who cannot or will not verify they fully comprehend our Constitution and intend to adhere to it’s mandates will garner any support. Obviously
    their only proof would be to directly challenge obama’s lack of eligibility.

    It is true that person is not on your list of potentials, but it is my understanding that there
    are at least two waiting to take advantage of obama crashing the gate for them.

  17. jacqlynsmith   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 10:47 PM

    My Plan for a Freedom President
    How I would put the Constitution back in the Oval Office

    by Ron Paul

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul647.html

  18. Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 10:31 PM

    JB – Spot on with your focused commentary!

    And, because none of the candidates will touch the Constitutional presidential eligibility issue, they all might be wondering the day after the 2012 election, why Conservatives, Independents and some Libertarians didn’t bother to vote. In a recent blog entry of mine, I put it this way:

    “Why vote for a Conservative to defeat Obama:?”

    ……….If Obama’s illegitimate and illegal occupation to the US presidency is not a priority with “conservatives,” – then, voting in the 2012 elections for a “conservative” [against, Obama] isn’t a priority with me and other “birther” conservative / patriotic, Americans!

    If the United States Constitution isn’t worth, upholding and fighting (for), – then, the defeat of the United State’s Constitution, usurper, isn’t worth it, either…….

    http://freedomtorch.com/blogs/12090/2941/why-vote-for-a-conservative-to-d

    Finally, if Sarah Palin does run for the GOP nomination, – she might just be the one person who has the courage to make the presidential eligibility issue a huge highlight of her campaign. If she does run and if she does highlight Obama’s unconstitutional, illegal presidency, Palin’s chances of occupying the White House are a very good percentage…….

  19. Mairi   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 10:27 PM

    The support of the Constitution is NOT a “pick-and-choose” option……it’s ALL or NOTHING! Not a single candidate running so far gets this……not a single candidate running so far is worth your vote!
    We have the POWER. Use it, and USE IT WISELY!
    I’d vote for Terry Lakin in a heart beat!
    Think outside the box, America…….BOTH parties have savaged our Revered Constitution. It’s time to make them pay for that mistake.

  20. packrat1145   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 9:32 PM

    Re “the most important question of the era, who is the fraud in the White House, how did he get there and how do we make sure that this can never happen again”

    Thanks for this great article, JB!

    I have preaching exactly what you are saying for the last three years or more.

    The Constitutional crisis we now face compliments of the ever widening fraud of Obama & Co. is the MOST important issue in America today. Before we can hope to fix any of our other problems long term, we MUST solve that crisis ASAP.

    We ALREADY have Rubio and Jindal waiting in the wings planning their opportunity to usurp the office of president even though neither is a natural born citizen. By contesting the true meaning of the term “natural born citizen,” they are either not knowledgeable enough of the Constitution; OR, they are willing to allow their political ambitions to over rule what they know is wrong.

    Therefore, either way, in my opinion, they are both unfit for any elected office in America!

    I’m sure there are many others in both parties who are willing to forgo the original intent of the Constitution in order to further their political careers.

    This issue MUST be solved ASAP; and, it most certainly needs to be solved before Obama completes even one full term.

    As you allude to, if he is allowed to complete a full term, that will set a legal precedent that will be almost impossible to overturn in future court cases dealing with that issue that are sure to come up.

    Courts have previously handed down rulings that if certain laws are moot if not enforced equitably in the past. This case is FAR too important to allow that to happen!

  21. Vicki   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    Good article – and a very good question to be asked of all the candidates to answer.

    Even if a candidate feels Article II isn’t that important – point is, it is a rule and law of the Constitution to abide if anyone wants to run for president. There is some talk about making it “law” for the next election. This idea is obsurd to me, because it already is a “requirement” and always has been, and followed all these years. No “new” law has to be made for this. These people in DC are law creation crazy!

    This is not complicated. It very simple.

  22. dotdotcom   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 9:05 PM

    I’m new on twitter (I’m @wwwdot_dotcom there) and Darrell Issa is following me so I keep tweeting about Obama’s ineligibility, fraudulent BC/SSN(s), criminal activities, etc, hoping Issa will see and do something. For all the readers here, if you pick to follow Darrell Issa (@DarrellIssa) and Senator Pat Toomey (@SenToomey) on twitter, they will probably follow you back (at least they did with me and several others I know) so if you have a twitter acc’t, follow them and if you don’t have an acc’t get one and follow them…then once they are following you, keep tweeting about this issue plus you can direct message them too…this is yet another way we can keep this issue in their face, join in the fun!

  23. 2discern   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 8:57 PM

    somehow the page reset- the five stones loading our usurper removal sling shot is-
    WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!

  24. 2discern   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    JB hits it again. This has been “the” question prior to the 2008 elections. We now see the cowardice of CONgress, in the longevity of this fraudulent occupation of the Oval office. This question is paramount to the entire future of our Republic.

    The blogging and articles are great. The media outlets that do cover the crime of the century with facts keep us informed. However, as the Founders took action in their day. Today, NOW, as in URGENT, we must act. Clogging the traffic arteries of DC we can descend upon the corruption nest of our despised leaders by the tens of thousands demanding the arrest (not the impeachment) of the fraud-in-chief. What agency of the US Gov still abides by the rule of law? We shall see. Should they all be complicit, we then form citizen tribunals (as grand juries) to indict based on law from our formation as “We the People”.

    Why can Spain, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Syria get the attention (often life threatening) of their government and we can’t get anything but a forged birth cert. He (barry soetero) mocks our laws and shoves Alinsky style leadership at us like we are dirt. I say, the Goliath of deceit is going down. We all need to stoop down at the brook of Freedom and grab 5 stones. Those 5 stones are 5 words with resolve. What are they? The sling shot of our full desire until satisfied is loaded-

  25. A Southern Lady   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 8:47 PM

    Yes! This letter echos my thoughts exactly!! Wonderful writing! Oh how I wish Lt Col Terry Lakin would run…HE would be the Dream Candidate we’ve all been waiting for and would totally freak out the criminals in DC. It’s not too late for him to get in the game and I’m praying that he WILL!

  26. Bob1943   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 8:43 PM

    They are all gutless when it comes to confronting Barry.

    There is an opportunity for someone to jump to the front of the pack to oppose Barry, simply by respecting the Constitution and not being afraid to speak out on Barry’s ineligibility and hidden records, bogus BC, etc., etc., etc.

    But they won’t have the courage to do so………

  27. Challenger   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 8:29 PM

    JB draws the clear line in the sand. I too have been keeping score and there is no one on the list that has the intestinal fortitude to stand for the Constitution. Many of the contenders/pretenders on the list have taken an oath to defend the Constitution or, if not yet, they must take the oath to become President. Yet, everyone on the list insults the American people with their weasel words, “I believe he is a citizen” or “I believe he was born in Hawaii” without even taking the time to determine Obama’s eligibility deficiencies or to examine into the meaning of the term ‘natural born citizen.’

  28. Donna   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 7:45 PM

    Vote for Col. Terry Lakin!!!! We know where he stands!!

  29. John Sutherland   Friday, May 27, 2011 at 6:40 PM

    Great article, and even greater question that must be asked and answered by every candidate – not just the GOP candidates.

    It is time for true constitutional patriots to stand up for what they believe in.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.