Defense Turns Michael Ellington’s Murder Trial Into an Inquisition Regarding the Corruption of Monroe County Sheriff Bill Bivens and His Deputies!

MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DETECTIVE TRAVIS JONES SIGHS, “I’M CONFUSED”

by Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III

Sheriff Bill Bivens won re-election in August 2010 in Monroe County, TN

(May 17, 2011) — Assistant Public Defender Jeanne Wiggins splayed Monroe County Sheriff’s Detective Travis Jones during cross-examination this afternoon on Day 1 of the Michael Ellington murder trial. Eliciting from Detective Jones one sobering revelation after the next, Attorney Wiggins deftly turned what was supposed to be a murder trial into a public inquisition and exploration of Sheriff Bill Bivens and his outlaw Monroe County Sheriff’s Department.

Mr. Ellington entered a plea of not guilty by reason of self-defense.

Ellington is charged with the March 17, 2009 premeditated murder in the first degree of Julia Ann Kinsey of Lenoir City, Tennessee.

Monroe County Sheriff Detective Travis Jones was the second prosecution witness called. Jones testified the lead detective on the Ellington case is Michael Morgan, Captain of Detectives for the MCSD and senior detective under Sheriff Bivens.

Morgan assigned Jones to interview Mr. Ellington on the night of March 17 and early morning of March 18, 2009. A 34-minute DVD video was played of the Ellington interview. Detectives Morgan and Jones began the interview. Sheriff Bivens joined late.

The late night/early morning video clearly shows Ellington in a state of extreme emotional distress. Obviously distraught and fatigued, Ellington struggled mightily in telling the sheriffs how Julia Kinsey surprise-attacked Ellington with a knife while Ellington was lying in bed.

Ellington told and retold how Kinsey came at him without warning, was pushed back once, and came back at Ellington again, knife in hand. Ellington defeated Kinsley, again pushing her away. There was a loaded shotgun in the bedroom. Ellington reached for the shotgun and fired at Kinsey as she began to rise to strike at Mr. Ellington a third time.

Ellington told the detectives and Sheriff Bivens he fired, then left the home to alert his brother to call 911.

Once Ellington told the detective what happened the first time, nothing changed. Nothing! Still Morgan bullied Ellington relentlessly to coerce Ellington to speak falsely against himself.

In the subdued and hushed courtroom, a plaintive realization washed over the people in the room as the DVD played on minute-by-minute. Morgan had a theory.

Mike Morgan’s theory was that Ellington loaded the shotgun before firing.

The DVD video shows Detective Morgan working very hard at badgering, bullying and trying to force Mr. Ellington to say Ellington loaded a gun Ellington never loaded.

The DVD shows Mike Morgan in the early stage of manufacturing a case against Mr. Ellington that the actual facts of the case, as they became known, would never support.

Mr. Ellington is now locked up for two years on Detective Morgan’s theory, one which Sheriff Bivens and head of detectives Mike Morgan knew the facts would never support.

In the quiet aftermath of the DVD showing, Stutts turned Jones over to Defense Attorney Wiggins for cross-examination.

Wiggins destroyed Detective Jones. And Wiggins destroyed Prosecutor Stutts’ case.

Jones testified that 14 objects of physical evidence were collected. Of the 14, only a sample of Ellington’s blood was sent off to outside labs for forensic examination.

No DNA tests were done on the knife or any other of the remaining 13 objects of evidence.

No fingerprints were taken from the knife. No attempt was made to collect fingerprints from the knife.

Detective Travis Jones testified all the physical evidence except Ellington’s blood sample were to be processed by the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department. Defense Attorney Wiggins asked about any outside laboratory reports or MCSD reports of evidence procession.

Jones responded saying there are no outside lab reports. There are no MCSD reports of evidence processing.

Travis Jones testified no photographs were taken of Mr. Ellington. Travis said he should have taken photographs but did not.

Wiggins queried Jones regarding clothes Ellington was wearing on the night of 17 March 2009. Jones said Ellington’s clothing should be in evidence. But Ellington’s clothes are not in evidence.

As the cross-examination progressed, it was determined that Mr. Ellington’s clothing was returned to Ellington’s family. Wiggins inquired of Jones about the existence of a property receipt. Rifling through his records, Jones couldn’t find a property receipt.

Jones was flummoxed at this point and edgy. Having had two years to get his case file straightened out, Jones nervously confided that his records were incomplete. At one moment he blurted out “I’m confused.”

Jones has had two years to get his files straightened out.

Repeating for impact: Lead Detective Michael Morgan did not file any report on the Ellington case.

“No neighbor statements were taken,” Jones told the Court.

Detective Jones said he examined a bed rail, shotgun shells and the shotgun from the crime scene but did not file any report.

Travis Jones did a visual examination of Mr. Ellington’s person and stated that he (Jones) saw no blood on Ellington’s shoes or clothing.

Travis Jones did not process Mr. Ellington’s shoes as evidence. As Jones tells it, there is nothing in any report regarding shoe prints. There are no photographs.

Jones was asked about the report his boss Michael Morgan had filed.

Detective Jones testified that lead detective Morgan did not prepare or file a report on Mr. Ellington’s case.

The autopsy doctor was called to the stand later, one Dr. Steven Cogswell. He verified  a copy of his report, then entered it into the record. Prosecutor Stutts then entered into evidence shell fragments retrieved during the autopsy.

The autopsy doctor testified that Julia Kinsey had a .01 blood-alcohol content. Kinsey also had toxic-lethal levels of methamphetamines and Prozac in her system at the time of her death.

The day began with jury selection. Judge Reedy closed the public hearing, disallowing anyone to observe the jury selection process.

A jury was selected and seated in two hours.

There will be more on what’s known regarding the jury and its selection in a future report.

Prosecutor James Stutts disclosed during his opening argument that he intends to use Ellington’s prior bad acts to argue Mr. Ellington is not lawfully entitled to raise the issue of self-defense in this trial.

Mark Boring from “The Buzz” and Michael Thomasson from the Advocate & Democrat represented the press.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6 Responses to "Defense Turns Michael Ellington’s Murder Trial Into an Inquisition Regarding the Corruption of Monroe County Sheriff Bill Bivens and His Deputies!"

  1. Jennifer ford   Friday, November 30, 2018 at 6:42 AM

    Michael Ellington is not a murderer. Bill bivens said at the sence saying he was going to make an example out of him. They had the gun out of the house before crime lab showed up also had flipped her body over before they got their. The landlord heard all that night. They wouldn’t let him speak. Julie told me a week before this happened she would kill Michael before he left her. Michael made her leave due to her giving her phone number to guys at the bar . Michael had been through hell growing up. Things you can’t hear from nightmares. He’s not a bad person nor would he kill out of cold blood. He loved her but her love for men he could not handle. He’s the loyalist person k know

  2. kbp   Tuesday, May 24, 2011 at 9:52 AM

    “…Mike Morgan’s theory was that Ellington loaded the shotgun before firing.”

    “…Detective Jones said he examined a bed rail, shotgun shells and the shotgun from the crime scene but did not file any report.”

    The second quote above indicates multiple “shells” were examined. The article does not reveal where these shells came from or if there were multiple shells in the gun in question.

    It is not clear why Mike Morgan wanted to use the theory that the gun was loaded before firing it, but if it relates to some state of mind that requires the loading of shells to have been immediately prior to firing a shot, the number of shells loaded then would be relevant.

  3. Trac   Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 8:50 PM

    Thank you Mr. Fitzpatrick for your dedication. You are a true Patriot, sadly though Tenn. is not the only state going all Nazi on us…some states go the LEGAL route:
    ———————————–

    Department of Pre-crime

    May 13, 2011 12:08 P.M. By Michael Walsh
    From Indiana comes this chilling decision on the gradual erosion of the Fourth Amendment — for your own good, of course. From NWI.com:

    Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.

    In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer’s entry.

    “We believe … a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,” David said… a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/267184/department-pre-crime-michael-walsh
    ———————
    did you notice that insane statement? The Indiana Supreme Court rules police can just walk in the door for no reason. But if the American Citizen doesn’t like –well they can protest through the court.
    Except the Indiana Supreme Court …Just…Ruled..?????

  4. Fran   Thursday, May 19, 2011 at 10:50 AM

    Corruption in the police department is exactly why O.J. got off the first time. The jury knew that the police were corrupt and the defense used it against them. The police are NOT our friend, any more. The Feds are not our friend and our representatives do NOT represent us, but their criminal bosses.
    I in no way will defend TN, as I have had my own problems with the “Judicial” system here., But we do drive throughout TN all the time with out of state license plates and have had no problem, This is because we are currently located in TN, but also have an address in MN and have been using that address too.

  5. Zeb Blanchard   Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM

    I was sitting in the waiting room of the MCSO with one of the locals folks one day when one of the deputies came through. He was all dressed up in some sort of SWAT team looking uniform which was very impressive to me. I asked the fellow I was with what the deputy was all about and he said he was: “Working the interstate”.
    Do be mindful of traffic violations when you go through TN, if you have to go through TN.

  6. Kristy   Tuesday, May 17, 2011 at 10:14 PM

    Dont ever drive thru Tenn. with out of state plate.
    http://dailybail.com/home/video-tennessee-cops-fight-each-other-to-steal-your-money-no.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.