The Post & Email Speaks with “New ‘Speaker of the House'” Theresa Cao

PRESS CONFERENCE TO BE HELD JAN. 19 FOLLOWING ARRAIGNMENT

by Sharon Rondeau

What is this man hiding?

(Jan. 18, 2011) — This morning The Post & Email spoke by telephone with Theresa Cao, who attended the reading of U.S. Constitution by the U.S. House of Representatives on January 6 and shouted out “Except Obama! Except Obama! Help us Jesus! My name is Theresa…!” when Article II, Section 1, clause 5 was read by Rep. Frank Pallone.

Article II states:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In response to Cao’s interruption in his reading, Pallone reportedly stated, “I mean it’s a fact that he’s a natural born citizen, so I think it’s just inappropriate for people to keep raising it. The problem is the people that keep raising it want to go against the facts…I think that was an example of this phenomenon today. There’s nothing he can do to make it go away because they just don’t want to face the facts.”

What are the “facts” to which Pallone was referring?

No proof that Obama meets the definition of “natural born Citizen” has been presented, and Obama himself has stated that he was born with dual citizenship, so questions remain about his eligibility.  More than a year ago, Obama had reportedly spent close to $2,000,000 to keep his records hidden, and more lawsuits have been filed since then.

ABC News reported that “controversial” sections of the “original” Constitution were omitted during the reading but did not mention the controversy surrounding Obama’s eligibility to serve as President and Commander-in Chief which prompted Cao’s exclamation on January 6.

A contributor to AOL News, Steven Hoffer, stated in an editorial masquerading as news on January 7 that he performed “a little digging” on Cao which revealed that “she blogs,” had spoken spoken to WorldNetDaily about the sentencing of Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin on December 16, 2010, and that “She’s not on Frank Pallone’s good side.”

An official press release at the Christian Newswire states that following the incident on January 6, “Cao was immediately removed from the gallery, then arrested, handcuffed, and charged with the federal misdemeanor of Unlawful Conduct [Disruption of Congress] [DC CODE: 10 DC 503.16 B.4]. Cao was processed and released by the Capitol Hill Headquarters Police, with a scheduled arraignment set for this Wednesday.”

A video of the House incident is here.

Cao asks that readers, friends, and anyone concerned about the nation and world “pray that God will be glorified in regard to the arraignment and its outcome” tomorrow.  She requested that three specific sections of the Bible be studied and shared:

Psalm 2

Acts IV, verses 24-31

Psalm 97, which declares God’s sovereignty

In John 15:18-25, Jesus says “If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If they kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do not know Him who sent Me. …

“He who hates Me hates My Father also…. But this happened that the word might be fulfilled which is written in their law, ‘They hated Me without a cause.'”

Citation for Theresa Cao from January 6, 2011 in the U.S. House of Representatives

32 Responses to "The Post & Email Speaks with “New ‘Speaker of the House'” Theresa Cao"

  1. kailuagirl   Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM

    The point of the matter is that your entire government, elected and appointed, obviously, REFUSE TO ENTER INTO ANY FORM OF LEGAL ANALYSIS OR REVIEW OF NATURAL BORN CITIZEN. So the question to ask is, why…and…why not?

    Further, it is not in anyway difficult to understand the requirement for POTUS to be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN [a] both daddy and mommy must have been US Citizen at the time of baby’s birth, and [b] baby must have been legally born in one of the US States. The subject matter is simple, and easy for the mass population, educated or not, to digest and comprehend.

    Connect the dots folks, the Obama handlers are working overtime once again to make sure the birth certificate chase is on full swing, why…because they fear more “new speakers of the house”.

  2. Metropolisonthehill   Saturday, January 22, 2011 at 1:16 PM

    Lucas Smith needs to be heard by Congress. People, please help! Thank you.

  3. True Patriot   Friday, January 21, 2011 at 7:40 PM

    Yes Sharon, great job as always. You truly are the best.

    I would like to say the time for debate and talking about this and that on the Constitution should be over among those of us who are working to unseat Obama.

    Bottom line: THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON OBAMA, NOT US.

    OBAMA’S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE THE PROPER DOCUMENTATION ENTERS HIS OWN PLEA OF GUILTY AS CHARGED.

    SO NOTED BY “WE THE PEOPLE”. This dangerous usurping fraud has already fixed the 2012 election for him to go right back in office, so we must be vigilant and stop him. America is not Obama’s to steal and he is stealing our nation right under our own eyes. WE MUST UNSEAT HIM NOW. WE MUST DEMAND OUR POLITICANS UNSEAT HIM NOW. THIS IS NOT OPEN FOR DEBATE OR ANY MORE BACK & FORTH DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION. THAT CONVERSATION HAS BEEN OVER FOR SOME TIME.

    OBAMA MUST BE UNSEATED PERIOD!!!!!!

  4. True Patriot   Friday, January 21, 2011 at 7:31 PM

    Excellent point G-Starz O will not allow anything to go to court that risks discovery.

    Theresa should sue and demand discovery. I can’t remember the name of the soldier
    that refused to deploy a couple of years ago, and they just gave him an honorable discharge, rather than face discovery. Too much info. coming in, but they just patted him on the hand, yet throw LTC. Lakin in Leavenworth. I hope we can get Lakin a decent Lawyer this time, & sue the socks off the US Army and the thugs who have imprisioned Lakin illegally, while this fraud sits in our White House. It is backwards entirely.

    Obama should be in prison, and Lakin should be in the White House.

  5. True Patriot   Friday, January 21, 2011 at 7:27 PM

    Correct G-Starz We have got to get in their face with fearlessness & demand through millions of us, that this fraud be unseated, and make the Congress do it. They work for us not the other way around. DC is totally out of touch with who is in charge.

    Theresa Cao was correct in yelling out except Obama, and they should not have removed her from our House (her House). The House does not belong to these evil vermin sitting perched like buzzards to destroy America and pick her apart.

    It is time for action. The debate is off the table, we can be polite, nice and stand firm all at the same time. YES WE WILL.

  6. G-Starz   Friday, January 21, 2011 at 3:34 AM

    Texoma,

    All your points would be true of Ma and Pa America and their urbane, x-box grandchildren gave a hoot about taking the time to understand the Constitution. They don’t and debating it further won’t make them want to. It makes them dizzy. They throw their hands up in the air. They feel they have better things to do and indeed they might because as noble and practically important as the constitution is, people need to live in a country with 10% unemployment, too, and that takes precedence.

    The left wing mainstream media isn’t covering this, so debating the constitution isn’t even an issue for most of America. They’re simply vaguely aware that Obama may have a birth certificate that he’s hiding and understand there may be some significance to this fact or there may not, and that’s as far as the left wants it to go. By debating the details endlessly and sucking the air out of the larger discussion, you’ll keep this debate exactly there the left wants it to be – stagnant on the fine points of Constitutional law – try getting a TV show about the fine points of Constitutional law on the air for more than 3 minutes. But a TV show about a country turned upside down by an illegal president is a story anyone can grasp and have an interest in. That’s how we have to see this, now – as entertainment programmers. that’s just how it is.

    At this point we’re only blabbering points of fact we all already know anyway, and simply doing it at each other. Everyone reading this at P&E gets it. They got it a long time ago. WE got it a long time ago. The few that stumble here and need to read it for the first time in a comment section are not as important as the fact that we need to stop retreading the same ground and now need to move forward on this issue.

    Moving forward means changing the tenor of the debate. It means getting in people’s faces. Now that Matthews and Abercrombie have successfully made this a bi-partisan issue we can stop being timid and delicate for fear of being labeled tinfoil hatters. Make it clear everywhere: the Obots are the tinfoil hatters. They’re the crazy ones, now, because in a bi-partisan world, only a nutjob defends a president who fights disclosure in court rather than turn over the same simple document that children use to play little league and most Americans use to get a driver’s license.

    THAT is where the discussion is, now. If people want to debate the constitution, send them to a particular story that explains it on this site or others that explain it. Let them do their own homework at this point. We don;t have time to continue to educate the stragglers who are well-informed enough to come to comment sections of stories about this – many of whom are Obots just playing dumb to run out the clock anyway by sucking the air out of the discussion to rob the issue of forward momentum. Don’t let them.

    Get in peoples’ faces. Call Obama a coward, because he’s clearly afraid of something on this issue.Cite the probability of deeply disturbed psychological behavior, because either a sadist or a paranoid man hides a simple record like this unless he has something material to hide. Tell everythone that Matthews and Abercrombie and the liberal Huffington post (2 years ago!) are calling for this. Liberal radio talk show hosts like NYC’s veteran Lynn Samuels are calling for it. Lou Dobbs, CNN’s 20-year, central anchor left his job over this issue. This is not small. It’s not fringe. It isn’t insignificant and it isn’t a discussion about the constitution.

    This is about Obama’s behavior and the underlying issue of his eligibility. Pour it on big and strong and loud.That’s where the discussion needs to be, now. A simple statement that the consitituion ULTIMATELY demands Obama release these records says everything on that part of this issue that needs to be said at this point.

    We’ve done all the pitching we need to.

    It’s time to close the sale.

  7. tom   Thursday, January 20, 2011 at 9:29 AM

    Agreed—
    And…
    It’s right there—in the U.S. Dept of State Foreign Affairs Manual- ‘Presidential Eligibility’~

  8. Texoma   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 11:59 PM

    The purpose of debating the eligibility of Obama is not to get Obama, but rather to defend the Constitution. If we can successfully defend Article II Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution while Obama is in office, the result will be his peaceful and legal removal from office, for he will be declared to not be a natural born citizen (born in the country to citizen parents).

    But the argument is not over should Obama leave office without having been removed for having usurped the Presidency. A successful post-Obama defense of the Constitution will still prevent future ineligible persons (such as Jindal) from becoming President or VP, and it will make Obama the last ineligible person to hold the office.

    Keep the focus on defending the Constitution, which is indeed something that ma and pa instinctively understand.

  9. Texoma   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 11:28 PM

    McCain is not a natural born citizen because he was not born on the sovereign territory of the US. Panama was the sovereign of the Canal Zone, as evidenced by us paying them rent.

  10. Starla   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 7:30 PM

    I agree with you completely!!

  11. Whomsoever   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 6:29 PM

    Brave lady, but the left will do ANYTHING to keep dissenters “shut up”. She, like Walt was, will be in for a rough road. The left will “motivate” her with jail time and fines and no amount of lawyer’s fees will change that. Libs control the D.C. courts, as sure as corruption controls the court in Monroe County, Tennessee.

  12. Harry H   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 1:38 PM

    Theresa Cao is a hero and deserves a strong legal defense. She only spoke the truth in a den of liars who have aided and abetted Obama’s criminal fraud. Where are the patriotic attorneys who could make this into a turning point?

  13. G-Starz   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 1:25 PM

    My feeling is that by debating what constitutes eligibility we’re going down a long and winding road that allows the left to run out the clock until 2016.

    get in their faces. Call Obama a coward. Call him a little yellow-stain. Say he’s hiding his past and is either paranoid or ineligible. Cite that the left and right are demanding it, now. Call him a knees-knocking, effeminate terror-stricken, arrogant, obnoxious coward. In other words, bring this down to earth. This discussion is in Constitutional geeksville. We need to put this out on the table ion a way that ma and pa America and their urbane grandchildren understand it in-depth instinctively.

    Only public pressure will change this. Say it plainly in a way people understand. Be polite and technocratic on this issue, the way the left would love us to be, at the peril of our freedoms.

    Get in their faces plainly. Make it real. Keep it real.

  14. Daniel Cutulla   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 10:55 AM

    > I have tried to explain the difference to her with three letters now and she has ignored me.

    Funny how *everyone* (Taitz, Apuzzo, Cao, …) keeps ignoring you. Maybe because you’re dead wrong?

    > If she claims to be a 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” then she already has a representative President because that is what Obama has claimed he is via Hawaiian birth and therefore she has no injury.

    Oh, that’s a new one. Now you’re claiming that 14th amendment citizens do not have the constitutional right to a natural born citizen president? On what (scientific?) arguments do you base that strange opinion?

    Your theories only show that you are the one who is moving away from the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, replacing its provisions at will with your own made-up regulations.

    So where does the Constitution say that the provision that the President must be a natural born citizen does not apply (meaning: give standing to) to 14th amendment citizens?
    Wouldn’t that mean by extension that if every US citizen were a 14th amendment citizen, the NBC provision would be meaningless? Is that what you’re saying about our Constitution?

    > I think she is doomed to be messed over by attorneys who do not even understand the difference between a natural right or a legal right or Positive Law or Natural Law.

    So you’re saying that Dr Taitz and Mario Apuzzo and Berg and … all “messed over” their clients and you’re the only one in the world who’s got it right. Right.

  15. Daniel Cutulla   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 10:48 AM

    > What is the difference?

    I have been asking you this question several times now and you’re still dodging the answer. Why does “Citizen” mean something else than “citizen”, but “Year” does not mean something else than “year” and “Nineteenth” does not mean something else than “nineteenth” in the Constitution? You still need to riddle me that.

    > IF you need some authority to tell you other than yourself then you don’t deserve to have a qualified President who represents you.

    My own authority tells me that you’re wrong. Your alleged “scientific” approach to this issue (meaning of capitalizaion in the Constitution) has so far been limited to “it is so because I say so”.

  16. Jedi Pauly   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 10:18 AM

    She does not need any discovery. It is common knowledge that Obama was born in Hawaii (just assume it for your arguments) and has a citizen mother (just assume it for sake of argument) and he never had a citizen father (matter of public record stated by Obama himself). That makes him a “natural born citizen” by statutory privilege but not a “natural born Citizen” by natural birth right of inheritance of a natural political sovereign right that only comes from a Citizen father according to the Laws of Nature. In order for Theresa Cao to properly defend herself depends on how she claims her rights. If she claims to be a 14th Amendment “citizen of the United States” then she already has a representative President because that is what Obama has claimed he is via Hawaiian birth and therefore she has no injury. If Theresa inherited her political rights from a citizen father then she is a “natural born Citizen” and also a “Citizen of the United States” as defined in Article II and the Constitution and she must claim her rights as a “natural born Citizen” not a 14th Amendment citizen. In that case then the Obama cannot represent her and therefore she is injured because a “citizen of the United States” is a “natural born citizen” but that is not the same thing as a “natural born Citizen” in Article II who is also by definition then a “Citizen of the United States”. This is the only way for her to have any proper defense otherwise she is guilty. I have tried to explain the difference to her with three letters now and she has ignored me. I think she is doomed to be messed over by attorneys who do not even understand the difference between a natural right or a legal right or Positive Law or Natural Law. Without understanding these differences she will not be able to defend herself and no citizen will be able to obtain standing in any civil suit against Obama. It is the only way for Theresa to claim her political rights under the first Amendment and claim that she has a right to disrupt Congress and yell fire.

  17. sky   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 10:00 AM

    I heard there’s a rally jan-24-2011? We The People Need To BE Large Enough That They CAN’T LEAVE THE CAPITOL,with all the people who are not employed need to go.Dont call him president,Dont call them senator,or congressman,Sir, military joints chief,or even your honor to any judge.He is a usurper, traitor, until he proves he isn’t,and any one backing him are traitors.
    ———————–
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: I read that it is Friday the 21st, a group called the Guardians of Liberty. I have never heard of them before.

  18. Jedi Pauly   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 9:47 AM

    There does not need to be any definitive statement IMHO. Obama is a “natural born citizen” due to Hawaiian birth. He is not a “natural born Citizen” as is meant in Article II. What is the difference? One is defined as a LEGAL RIGHT and the other is defined as a NATURAL RIGHT. Do you know the difference? Can you say WHY? It is up to you to know the difference and why. IF you need some authority to tell you other than yourself then you don’t deserve to have a qualified President who represents you. IMHO

  19. Indyenquirer   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 8:49 AM

    What is most needed is a definitive statement from the institution with the authority to do so as to what is meant by the term “natural born citizen” as it pertains to the eligibility requirements for the office of President of the United States. Perhaps this will be achieved if Obama’s eligibility is challenged in every state he attempts to become a candidate in the 2012 primaries.

  20. G-Starz   Wednesday, January 19, 2011 at 1:27 AM

    Just a thought someone may want to look into:

    Now that Theresa Cao has been arrested, and her motivations were instinctively set into motion by Obama’s bizarre and seeming paranoid behavior, does Cao now have “standing” to initiate a suit to erase the arrest from her record and in so doing, have the right to discovery?

  21. dotdotcom   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 8:55 PM

    Bless Theresa Cao, a brave patriot!

  22. Kevin J. Lankford   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM

    What truely should be noted is that when the eligability requirement for President was read
    Theresa Cao’s voice was the only other heard. The silence of the whole of congress was
    as a subliminal message that the issue is dead to them all.

  23. Stephen Cessy   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 7:01 PM

    > our own Senate in Apr 08 resulting from the investigation into the eligibility of John McCain, defined natural born citizen to be “born to American citizens”

    No, Senate said that “born in Panama Canal Zone + two citizen parents => natural born citizen”. The opposite direction does not necessarily hold, as elementary logic dictates.

    Besides, if Senate had thought two citizen parents were enough, the specifics of McCain’s Panamaian birth wouldn’t have been worth mentioning.

    In fact, it is doubtful McCain complies with the NBC requirements, so citing Senate on this – even if you cited it correctly – will not get you far.

  24. Kevin J. Lankford   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 6:56 PM

    I find it quite amazing how small an infraction, or how meager the insult, these people will unload their whole arsenal.

    As with Sarah Palin, or Joe the plumber, they will drop an atomic bomb on a gnat to defend
    their fraud.

  25. Starla   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 6:09 PM

    “WHAT OBAMA HAS SAID ABOUT HIS OWN BIRTH”

    By Jack Cashill

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/01/what_obama_has_said_about_his.html

  26. MacPUBLIUS   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 4:58 PM

    Sharon,
    I gave up long ago trying to keep track of all the key players and individuals that have committed Treason or Misprision of Treason. I don’t believe I am being paranoid when I say “they all know”. They are not listening because they don’t care to hear it. The size and scope of this thing is mind boggling. It is going to take several million people all shouting through megaphones at the same time for them to hear and realize that we are serious about our republic and our constitution. We need to go to Washington… again.
    All my best, Mac

  27. Justitia   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 4:51 PM

    This is very humbling and I thank you for this piece. Ms Cao, though reviled by liberals and even misunderstood by some conservatives, is actually a heroine of CONSTITUTIONALISTS! She reminds one of the founding fathers, the framers, and such luminaries as Abigail Adams, Dolly Madison and a host of other heroines.
    Her faith in God is a reminder that the journey to reclaim the Republic from Usurpation may not be easy, but that we are part of the Communion of Saints and the COMMUNION OF PATRIOTS of YORE.

  28. Redd Dogg and G-Starz   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 4:16 PM

    A couple of thoughts:

    1. Chris Matthews, the very liberal TV Host of MSNBC’s prime-time “Hardball” as well as the very liberal Gov Abercrombie of Hawaii have both called for Obama to release his long form birth certificate, Matthews going so far as to explain why what Obama posted as ‘evidence” isn’t worth anything. So how is there any mystery that Obama has NOT released to proper documents? Matthews and Abercrombie have made this a contemporary, bi-partisan issue, and this aspect of the current climate needs to be emphasized day and night so people get it.

    2. What exactly is it – exactly – for which the redoubtable Ms. Cao is being arraigned, anyway? Calling out from the balcony of the People’s House? I mean, I can see, unfortunately, removal – but arraignment? Of a peaceful pro-Christian threatening no one, about a fair constitutional issue? We don’t want to get into hyperbolic rhetoric, but this is beginning to sound like Soviet Russia.

  29. A.   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 4:09 PM

    The book – “OBAMA – INELIGIBLE TO SERVE – LIES, CRIMES AND DEADLY AMBITION” at Amazon, explains in detail the exact Legal Facts that prove that Obama is NOT ELIGIBLE to be President and why he will ultimately be removed from office.
    (“OBAMA – INELIGIBLE TO SERVE – LIES, CRIMES AND DEADLY AMBITION” – easily ordered from Amazon online.)

    Wake Up America!!!!

  30. lana   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 2:58 PM

    She really fights for what she believes.

    Speaking of fighting didn’t Mr Fitzpatrick and Mr Swensson have court cases today in terrible Tennessee? Have you heard anything?
    ———————-
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Story coming up.

  31. Stock   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 2:36 PM

    The very simple fact-and you have to keep it simple for the Obots to understand-a) Art II requires the President to be a “natural born citizen”; b) our own Senate in Apr 08 resulting from the investigation into the eligibility of John McCain, defined natural born citizen to be “born to American citizens”; and c) Obama admits not only to being a “dual citizen” but being born to a Kenyan father. This is Ms. Caos defense-the truth-simply put.

  32. Sher Zieve   Tuesday, January 18, 2011 at 2:07 PM

    EXCELLENT. Great job, Sharon!!!

    –Sher

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.