Are There Traitors Among Us?


by 1 Dragon, blogging at Socialism is not the Answer

(Jan. 11, 2011) — When History details the Obama Presidency, how will it be written? If it’s written by Liberals, they may refer to him as the Great Hope of our time. If it is written by a Conservative, they may be nice and just say he was a man with no experience. However, if History really looks at all the facts, they may wonder why the People accepted this man at all.

The facts about Obama have been hidden, sealed and erased, not only by Obama himself but by the media, Democrats and Republicans. If this and other articles survive the corruption of Obama and his followers, History may paint a different picture of the current Resident in Chief.


No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.


A “natural born” citizen is any person born of US citizen parents (that’s two) in the U. S. mainland (includes Alaska and Hawaii) – think Ronald Reagan — in this case, there is no foreign entanglement via parentage AND there is no foreign entanglement via birthplace.


Obama is not a “natural born” citizen because his father was a Kenyan national and a British subject, as was Obama, “at birth.”  The Obama Campaign describes Barack Obama Sr. as, “a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948.  That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”


All U. S. military personal and every other American under oath to protect and defend the U. S. Constitution will be duty bound to remove the fraudulent usurper.  This situation is REGARDLESS of votes, electors, media blackouts, high profile embarrassments, state court decisions, supreme court actions or inaction, birth certificates real or forged, or any other documents — Obama can NOT LEGALLY BE The US President.

No documentation is required.  Everyone should understand and KNOW the answer to the question of what country is the country of which Obama was a natural born citizen.  It is IMPOSSIBLE for Barry Obama, Barry Soetoro, or Barack Hussein Obama II, to be a natural born United States citizen.  Obama can NOT POSSIBLY be a “natural born citizen” of the U. S. because his father, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, was a subject of Great Britain and a citizen of Kenya.


Obama’s first act as President, Executive Order 13489 banning release of any of his records.


Since the election of Obama, he has done more to divide this Country then he has to bring it closer. We are not just divided by Democrats and Republicans, we are considered a racist if we disagree with him or his policies. After the Ft. Hood shooting we were told not to jump to conclusions because the shooter was praising Allah, yet after the recent Tucson shooting, members of the Left and the media were blaming everyone from the Tea Party and Sarah Palin to Rush Limbaugh. He continued to divide us on the Ground Zero Mosque, the Arizona Immigration Issue, banning offshore drilling, ramming Obamacare down the throats of Americans and appointing all of his Socialist/Marxist Czars.

So where are our representatives? Who knows. Apparently, even though they just read the U.S Constitution on the House Floor, they either didn’t understand what they read or they were just words. Either way, Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

With a sealed and shady past and a complete disregard to what the American People have stated that they want, every American should question who Obama really is. And with a complete disregard to the Constitution, Congress should investigate every road Obama has ever been on. It’s time to put an end to Obama’s Free Pass and make him accountable. Anything less is unacceptable.

16 Responses to "Are There Traitors Among Us?"

  1. Daniel Cutulla   Thursday, January 13, 2011 at 5:25 AM

    > The problem that you and everyone else has is that you do not understand

    Obviously you are the only person in the world who keeps talking about the “paternal citizenship” issue whereas real constitutional experts such as Mario Apuzzo and Orly Taitz beg to differ.

    Besides, I reiterate my criticism that you keep posting your theories in every other thread, yet still refuse to discuss your “scientific findings” with others.

    > that Article II “natural born Citizen” is not describing the “natural born citizen” that is defined in U.S. law by statutory authority

    You still have not answered my questions as to the alleged significance of “Citizen vs. citizen” compared to the deduced significance of “Year vs. year” or “Nineteenth vs. nineteenth” in the Constitution, in short, your unexplained and unexplainable capitalization theory.

    If you keep evading that issue (the only time you answered to my objections was a patronizing rant with no address of my actual arguments), by scientific standards it must be assumed to be indefensible and thus bogus.

    > that have defined a “natural born citizen” to be anyone who is born on U.S. soil regardless of parentage

    Which, combined with the fact that your capitalization theory is bogus, would mean that Obama/Soetoro would be eligible if he were proven to be born in Hawaii. I don’t think that theory sits so well with the others around here. ;)
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: Perhaps a sitting federal grand jury should be asked to investigate the origins of the “natural born Citizen” clause in the Constitution and, after gathering evidence, submit it to the U.S. Supreme Court for a definition that will clear up the matter once and for all.

  2. Daniel Cutulla   Thursday, January 13, 2011 at 5:14 AM

    > I like the version where there are 2 parents that are USA citizens-anything less is crap-no matter what LAW Degree you have

    With all due respect for your opinion, the only thing that matters in the end is the rule of Law and the Constitution, not what some people “like” or not. As for the latter, you are free to work towards a Congress majority that will amend the Constitution with anything you want to have changed.

    As for discussion, the focus should be on whether two citizen parents are *legally required* for being “natural born”, not on whether you would *like* it to be so.

    That’s why the work of Mario Apuzzo and others is so important, because the issue is complicated and not a no-brainer. (If the Post & Email makes it appear so, it’s only because it relies on the extensive research that has been done on this issue which enables us to say “of course he’s not eligible because…”.)

  3. Jon Carlson   Thursday, January 13, 2011 at 12:56 AM

    The best evidence against Obama is his lack of fluency in spoken English like ALL foreigners. In addition, nobody with a court case has brought up the forged birth announcement. Both are easily proved.

    America has been infiltrated by foreign spies at the highest level of the Federal Government. That is easily proven also.
    Obama Birth Announcement Forged

  4. Donald   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 10:53 PM

    …so, likewise anyone that is in government that refuses to address the issue of Obama not being qualified to serve as President, and even not considering his Social Security fraud and many other issues as items of concern, is, by the Constitution, a Traitor to the U.S.A.

  5. Harry H   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 10:31 PM

    Obama is not and can never be our legitimate president, but he is a clever president-elect and did give a pretty good speech tonight in Tucson by which he effectively turned the Tucson tragedy to his political advantage, thereby making a political asset out of multiple murder. But eligibility is a legal question, not a political one, and Obama is unqualified by the Constitution; he was not made eligible by being elected or by his gift for oratory.

  6. 32eagle   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 5:58 PM

    I like the version where there are 2 parents that are USA citizens-anything less is crap-no matter what LAW Degree you have-when something don’t work don’t make the foolishness complicated for the working man to deal with-we never needed a liar,a damn fool,an asshole,a traitor,a security risk,a failure of a human being,a no good whiney muslim with no moral integrity whatsoever-useless in form -worse in function,what is he good for?only one thing to be locked up for life for violating our CONSTITUTION

  7. SUSAN   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 2:50 PM

    The media, papers, and tv outlets refuse to refer to anything conservative in the least.So, lets look at who owns them. Abc-Disney,NBC- General Electric,all in fact are owned by
    corporate Industy. All. UPI is owned by the MOONIES and the list goes on.Lets just all get into our automobiles and drive to Washington and speak for ourselves.They can’t put all of us in Jail. All 300 Million of us.We are going to have to make some kind of action or become a Marxist-Facist Gov’t like what the Nazi’s were under.Its getting closer everyday.When these people take over you won’t own anything folks. Anything.Then, we will hear Geoge H.W.Bush talking about his beloved thoughts on “The New World Order”.Obama is finishing the job for the skull and bones Nazi group.Old man Prescot Bush was a member in good standing along with Harriman. They financed Hilter. Its in the archives in Washington, D.C..Check it out for yourself.

  8. sky   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 1:07 PM

    theprovocateurnetwork american dream record

  9. Jedi Pauly   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 11:12 AM

    Dear Dragon;

    I admire your Patriotism however your “facts” leave a lot to be desired. In particular:

    “A “natural born” citizen is any person born of US citizen parents (that’s two) in the U. S. mainland (includes Alaska and Hawaii) – think Ronald Reagan — in this case, there is no foreign entanglement via parentage AND there is no foreign entanglement via birthplace.”

    The above statement is in fact FALSE under U.S. statutes and Supreme Court cases that have defined a “natural born citizen” to be anyone who is born on U.S. soil regardless of parentage. Your “fact’ is not a fact at all but is supposition on your part that is not supported by any careful examination of Article II and applied legal principles of JURISDICTION or by natural reality.

    The problem that you and everyone else has is that you do not understand that Article II “natural born Citizen” is not describing the “natural born citizen” that is defined in U.S. law by statutory authority (Positive Law). In fact, Article II nbC is not even a legal term that is meant to be defined in the Constitution, or by case law, but rather it is just an adjective (“natural born”) that is describing a proper noun (Citizen) that is describing a specific instance of a citizen meaning a SOVEREIGN U.S. citizen. It means one who is born inheriting a Sovereign Political authority as a U.S. citizen.

    The term in Article II is already well defined by appealing to the opposite jurisdiction to that of Positive Law which is the Natural Law jurisdiction. Article II nbC means one who is born as a SOVEREIGN U.S. citizen. Sovereignty is a Natural Political Right. Natural Rights come from the Natural Law jurisdiction, not from Congress or the Courts (Positive Law jurisdiction), and they are endowed (means INHERITED) from a citizen father according to the Laws of Nature. In the Natural Law jurisdiction it is only a citizen FATHER that is required because it is your father, who is a MALE, who secures your membership (citizenship) in your father’s society and who secures all of your political rights. (see my analysis of Vattel here at the Post and Email. Just use the above search engine and search Jedi Pauly and also see the Declaration of Independence “to secure these RIGHTS governments are instituted among Men” meaning MALES [emphasis added]) Vattel makes this very clear that it is only your father that is required to be considered a native of your father’s country. When it comes to just soil jurisdiction (Positive Law), or to your mother when you have a foreign dad (competing jurisdictions), then your rights and citizenship are secured by STATUTE which is a function of the Positive Law jurisdiction, not by your father which is a function of the Natural Law Jurisdiction that Article II is talking about. What Congress and Obama are illegally doing is enforcing Obama’s Presidency under a Positive Law jurisdiction by asserting soil as the authorizing authority (Hawaiian birth) when in fact Article II requires enforcement of the Natural Law jurisdiction which means that it is only your FATHER who is the authorizing authority.

    Article II requires one to inherit a Natural Political Right of Sovereignty (Sovereignty is a Natural Political Right spelled out in the Declaration of Independence) in order to be President so that we will have a representative form of government where the President who signs Bills into “laws’ will be born as a natural representative of the sovereign citizens who represents the sovereign will of the People. This only requires a citizen father who creates you. Any conflict in loyalties or allegiances at birth due to foreign soil or a foreign mother are dealt with by the 14 year residency requirement in Article II that uses TIME and RESIDENCY to force one to REPATRIATE one’s self back to the U.S in order to sever any foreign owed allegiances and reestablish your loyalty and allegiance to the U.S. that you were born with that was inherited from your citizen father. Foreign soil or a foreign mother cannot prevent one from inheriting Natural Political Rights or membership in your father’s society. One need only claim these rights that one is born inheriting regardless of where you are born (soil jurisdiction) or your mother’s status as a citizen.

    The term “PATRIOT” is derived from the Greek/Latin “patros” which means FATHER. To repatriate yourself means to return to the land of your FATHER and take up his loyalties. Obama does not qualify simply because he was not born to a citizen father. Obama cannot “repatriate” himself to the U.S. because he would have to “repatriate” to Kenya. Obama was born inheriting a Natural Sovereign Political Right to represent sovereign Kenyan citizens not sovereign U.S. citizens. This is why Obama does not meet Article II requirements. Your place of birth and citizenship status of your mother are irrelevant for Article II purposes. There is no support in law or reality for the notion that one must be born free of competing jurisdictions in order to qualify for President. The Law (Natural Law) and reality and the 14 year residency requirements of Article II only requires one to have a citizen father so you will be born inheriting a Natural Sovereign Political authority in order to qualify for President which is a Natural Sovereign Political Right (Natural Right) not a “legal right” of the soil which is just a statutory “privilege” of the Positive Law jurisdiction. If Article II was talking about privileges of the Positive Law (soil or mother) then Congress could just create a Presidential statute as a legal right or “privilege” and give it to a special class of citizens and disenfranchise the sovereign citizens of their country and sovereign political rights to a representative form of government.

  10. jim   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 11:01 AM

    The political and judicial system is broken beyond repair. We have been had. Anybody with an IQ above 60 should know that. It’s just a matter of time now that the “right people” are running the show. We had plenty of warning. We chose to ignore the signs. Now we will pay dearly for our ignorance. It was a great country. Prepare fellow countrymen.

  11. Larry M. Meyer   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 8:00 AM

    “Sticks and Stones”~~READ the Constitution-(NOT the REDACTED Version read by Congress)-and the DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE, then “The Federalist’s Papers”; Then “ASK NOT, what YOUR Country can DO for You, BUT RATHER, WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY!?”
    “Beware, The House of Hippocrates!”
    The Traitors among us are 535 of our “Elected Representatives” that are GUILTY of TREASON!! They Suffer from ACUTE DEMEMTIA of their Swearing and Affirmation to “The Constitutional Oath” and “WE the People” are Complicit by LAW-(as I have read the Statutes Posted here)-by NOT Reporting and Charging Individuals with “Acts of TREASON!!”
    TO Those Ends, It shall become the Duty and Responsibility of the People to ABOLISH or CHANGE Government~~~~~~~~~~!!

  12. Robert Laity   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 2:33 AM

    Obama is a Traitor!

  13. Robert Laity   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 2:28 AM

    The Constitution should NEVER be “Disregard[ed]”.

  14. A pen   Wednesday, January 12, 2011 at 1:11 AM

    Traitors among us ? I think it better asked is there a reason to play Neville while we slide into turmoil just as every communist regime has? For those who feel their wealthy status a cushion against hard times, watch what happens to the dollar. For those who are warm and secure behind their front door, wait till the hungry smash it in. For those who think their government jobs will provide what they need, not if it is bankrupt. Finally, for all who wear a uniform, you are far outnumbered to preserve the peace. You should have made your move when the criminals broke into our house and began looting it while daring us all to stop them.

  15. Time   Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 10:38 PM

    All the words written sound accurate and should by every standard be enforced… But, as we all have come to live and see that not to be… It will take a miracle at this point to get anyone in Washington to do their job. Each of them get paid very well, plus the perks they receive and the perks they do not receive but still take…One would think, they would want to secure their jobs…Until you realize, these people fear not the people that work to give them all that they have, fear not they will lose what they have, and their invincible in their eyes and their peers.. Laws they have placed onto the people have protected/shielded them from loss… They continue on their merry way, laughing all the way to the bank, as we weep, begging for scraps… Yes, they all lost their hearing in Washington..They all have lost their vision and now the only thing they can hear or see is the sound of their own voice and the sight of their own paychecks…They cannot see We The People or the constitution…Therefore they will NEVER abide by either….Obama, will stay snug as a bug, eating off the fruits of every Americans labor… His days are not numbered they are protected by every person in both parties in Washington…Maybe this is the HOPE and CHANGE he was talking about. Hope is hoping to prove he is ineligible. Change, is the change he has done to the constitution by pulling this off and no one will remove him…I weep for what they have done to every last one of us….

  16. ch   Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 9:34 PM

    I think that the Alinsky people have out-maneuvered the law-abiding people in Congress with their manipulative rhetoric, saying it would take up too much time to deal with, it would divide the country, and undo too much legislation. Not to mention Supreme Court justices. They are probably making secret deals, begging that if you ignore this issue, we will give you this. The law-abiding people are being appealed to their inner ideals, according to Alinsky, and made to feel guilty if they stand up for what is right…such as “you will embarrass the President..” “You will cause a civil war or riot.” blah blah blah After they finish reading the Constitution, they might want to read Rules for Radicals out loud on the Congress floor, and hold up the pictures for everybody, and then read with the list of outlined tactics for communism to take over a country, such as pronography to destroy morals, sports to distract from what is going on. Maybe a grand finale could be….reading the laws on how treason is handled.

    I think the law-abiding citizens have been duped, Obama has embarrassed himself, but I do not think he is really the kind that gets embarrassed…I think he does not want the embarrassment of being removed. The country is being divided by the disrespect and treasonous behavior, not by the handling of it. I also think that the law-abiding members have decided to “move on” and are laying groundwork for the future. Too bad they are so easily manipulated by the Alinsky crowd. The puppet masters must be delighted!! There are too few Lakins, Taitzs, Mannings, Kerchners and Fitzpatricks in the world. Few people can stand alone against their peers. Most people seem to need the security of the approval of their peers and cannot follow their conscience if it leads them to stand up alone. We have to keep praying. Hard!!

    We have a new Marian shrine in the United States, at the level of Fatima and Lourdes. God is quietly fighting back against communism in a most interesting way. The shrine is north of Chicago!! Our Lady of Good Help, at Champion, Wisconsin.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.