If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
IF KELLY NEEDS AN EDUCATION IN THE CONSTITUTION, WHAT DID SHE LEARN IN LAW SCHOOL?
January 3, 2011
The following letter was sent to Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly in response to her recent report on Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin’s court-martial and the underlying issue of the “birthers.”
I sincerely hope that you read this fully, as your ‘fair and balanced’ report on the Obama “birther’ issue was biased and unprofessional.
The fact remains that Barack Hussein Obama has not established his credentials as required by the United States Constitution, for the Presidency.
Worse then that fact alone is the media, including Fox News to disregard the basic facts and misrepresent that “just being born in the US’ is qualification enough to be eligible for the Presidency.
Per the United States Constitution;
The term citizen is, however the term citizen is also used in the United States Constitution as in Article I – The Legislative Branch
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
“a Citizen of the United States”
Section 3 – The Senate
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.
” been nine Years a Citizen of the United States”
Section 1 – The President
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
“natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”
House = Citizen
Senate = Citizen
President = Natural Born Citizen
The distinction is clear between a citizen and a natural born citizen, and Obama fails that as a British subject as stated by himself.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”
That is why the only thing they focus on is birth location, not the Constitutional requirement of a ‘Natural Born Citizen’, but then again Obama has not even establish that he was born in Hawaii, he was only registered in Hawaii. Registered and Born are different, like claims and facts.
Now you exclaim Neil Abercrobie as an authoritive source without realizing the conflicting information. The newly elected Gov of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie has stated the biggest fopaux concerning the unblessed nativity of Barack Hussein Obama in that, as he stated ”Maybe I’m the only one in country that could look you right in eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born”…
So I wonder when Abercrombie was in Kenya, cause not only is he like he says ‘the only one in ‘THIS’ country?’ but it conflicts with the Ambassador to Kenya’s statement that the place that the newly elected President was born at was already a monument and that they we’re planning on placing a plaque there, which coincides with the Kenyan Government official stating “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?”
So Abercrombie, is either lying that he was there when Obama was ‘BORN’ in Hawaii, or else Abercrombie was in Kenya when Obama was born.
Seeing an infant is not the same as seeing him born, just as claiming you were born in Hawaii.
Regardless of where Obama was born, he fails the Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, based on a foreign father. His birth place is a distraction, and only those that believe that being born in country qualifies as being eligible for the Presidency, imagine Osama Bin Laden visiting here and getting a young girl pregnant. That child being even born here is not Constitutionally eligible. There is no difference between that and Obama Sr a foreign exchange student in Hawaii.
At the time of the adoption of the United States Constitution, citizenship flowed from the father, it was a brithright inheritance and children followed the condition of their fathers. It is that simple.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Now, Barack Hussein Obama has a political prisoner, and thanks to the media [including FoxNews] a decorated military officer is imprisoned for asking the very eligibility questions that the citizens are demanding answered.
The military in denying Terrence Lakin a defense, the military railroaded a career military officer in order to protect an illegal undocumented foreigner, Barack Hussein Obama.
I maintain, that Barack Hussein Obama was never a US Citizen. Born in Kenya as his grandmother stated, and brought into the marriage between Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham.
I have been investigating the Obama COLB issue since Aug 2008, I maintain a blog where I document the forgery and even have posted a video on YouTube detailing how to create an exact copy of the forgery.
My blog has detailed information and you are free to use it.
and my YouTube Channel
Fair and balanced Megyn, why not have others to actually debate the issue, instead of faux and biased reporting.
I would recommend CDR Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo as excellent sources to counter the lies and deceit of falsely claiming that an undocumented and illegitimate foreigner is eligible to the Office of the Presidency. In closing I would like to direct you to the CRO’s report that instructed Congress how to disregard the citizens questions during and after the campaign.