If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Neil Turner

How can this man continue to hide all of his records and expect to stay in office?

(Dec. 21, 2010) — The argument that LTC Lakin asked the wrong question when he refused to deploy to Afghanistan – a direct order for the surge from the office of the Commander-in-Chief – sounds plausible, but is false and misleading. LTC Lakin did not ‘ask a question’.  He only demanded proof that the putative (i.e., accepted as true on inconclusive grounds) Commander-in-Chief (CIC) could issue anything other than unlawful orders, a sworn duty of all U.S. Military officers.

Lakin did suggest some means by which Obama could prove otherwise – by releasing all his unlawfully hidden records such as passports, school records, law records, Selective Service registration records (an additional requirement to be in the Executive Branch), and a long-form birth certificate.

LTC Lakin should have been found Not Guilty by reason of ‘NON-INSANITY’, for it would be insanity to follow the orders of a CIC who has not yet proven that he can give anything but unlawful orders!

Until Obama does – which We The People know that he cannot – then anyone who follows any orders from this Usurper-in-Chief (thank you, Maureen Dowd of The New York Times) is, in fact, complicit in aiding and abetting Obama’s acts of Treason.  This would include JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind and her superiors up through Major General Carla G. Hawley-Bowland, Major General Karl R. Horst, and the Army Chief of Staff, General George W. Casey, Jr.

It would also include LTC Lakin’s Congressman, Rep. John Duncan (R), his two U.S. Senators, as well as the entire 111th Congress, plus SCOTUS – all of whom aided and abetted in the seating of a known-to-be-ineligible Usurper in the Office of President and Commander-in-Chief.

Let us not forget that the ultimate conspirator was none other than the previous Natural-Born President and Commander-in-Chief, George W. Bush, who, in a final act of absolute Treason, knowingly turned over the reins of our Constitutional Republic to a non-Natural-Born ‘citizen’ – in violation of his oath to, and the Article II terms of, the Constitution of the United States.

Just as the charges of Treason by LTCDR Walter Fitzpatrick, III – now a political prisoner in a dungeon in Madisonville, TN, on trumped-up, false charges by a fatally-flawed Grand Jury and a (Kangaroo) Court Trial – just as these charges and demands go unanswered and are still in play today, so the demands of LTC Terry Lakin go unanswered to this day.

What is the more serious charge?

  1. Missing a movement, in order to not be in compliance with unlawful orders, or;
  2. Aiding and abetting in the act of Treason – of (Kangaroo) Courts-Martialing an honorable and obedient-to-his-oath Military Officer, while failing to offer one shred of evidence that the putative CIC can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

The answer is obvious!

What Can Be Done About This?

Since the entire Congress, the JCS, the SCOTUS, the DOJ, and Law Enforcement are all complicit in this ultimate act of treason, and

Since We The People cannot indict them all at once, we suggest the following:

I.        Begin forming local 5th Amendment Citizens’ Grand Juries (Carl Swensson of www.RiseUpForAmerica.com and Bob Campbell of www.AmericanGrandJury.org have paved the way here), and start indicting the traitors – one by one.
(e.g.,  a Citizens Grand Jury nearby Ft. Meade, MD or in nearby VA should begin with JAG Judge Col. Denise R. Lind.  The charges could be: convening an illegal Courts-Martial; falsely convicting an honorable military officer; denying a defendant his right to self-defense/calling witnesses; judicial misconduct; aiding and abetting in acts of Treason, etc.).

II.        When these ‘easy-to-conclude’ indictments go unanswered by the now-complicit Judiciary and Law Enforcement, the People should then form 9th and 10th Amendment Citizens Court Trials (Dr. James David Manning of ATLAH.org has paved the way with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL – see www.CRS-Reports.org for the verdicts and transcripts) and issue actionable Guilty Verdicts and Sentencing.

III.        Finally, when the Citizens Court Trial verdicts and sentences are ignored by the corrupt law enforcement and the judiciary, use the already formed Citizens’ Militias to carry out the arrests and sentencing. (States that already have Citizens Militias are: AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, ID, IN, KY, ME, MI, MN, NH, NJ, JC, OH, OR, PA, TX, UT, VA, & WA).

There is still time to begin correcting this matter before it goes too far:

A.    Maj. Gen. Karl R. Horst can vacate the verdict and sentencing of LTC Lakin (he is being formally served with the CIA COLUMBIA OBAMA Sedition & Treason TRIAL transcripts on December 20, 2010), and call for a retrial for the exoneration for LTC Lakin – while demanding proof that Obama can issue anything other than unlawful orders;

B.    The 111th Congress can go into a joint session before year-end 2010, and hear the evidence and remove the Usurper and his cabal of thugs in handcuffs immediately;

C.    Finally, since all who are presently in the Constitutional line of succession for the Office of President and CIC are complicit in this Treason, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should assume control (as in Honduras) until new elections of a Constitutionally qualified President and Commander-in-Chief can be held on April 5, 2011.

It should be noted that the incoming Republican majority cannot be expected to do anything about this on their own, since they know that Obama is destroying the Democrat Party while strengthening their own Party – and that keeping him in the White House, although unqualified and ineligible, increases their chances for complete control in 2012, and;

The Joint Chiefs of Staff have already shown their hand – that they would rather send an oath-upholding decorated and honorable officer to Leavenworth (where he is incarcerated now*), rather than uphold their oath to the Constitution – because they assume that if they expose the Usurper, the existing military forces will leave their posts until a lawful CIC can be installed, and ‘There MAY BE Blood’ (assumed).

On the other hand, We The People** can no longer be expected to passively give up our rights and our Constitution, and that to preserve our unalienable rights it is more likely that ‘There WILL BE Blood’ (assured).

That’s how our emerging nation got things done over 200 years ago – with Citizens Grand Juries and Citizens Court Trials, and with oath-honoring sheriffs and lawmen.  If it was good enough for our founding fathers then, it should certainly be good enough for us now.

And we’ve got a well-seasoned ‘contract’ to work with – the U.S. Constitution.  It worked then. There is no reason to trash it and start over. It will work for us now – if we will only speak up and use it.

“With the privilege and honor of knowing of, swearing to, and living under our Constitution, comes the responsibility and duty of defending, maintaining and adhering to it.”

As Dr. Laura has oft been heard to say, Now go do the right thing.’

*Send cards and letters (no food, supplies, or books) to:

Terrence Lakin #89996   (NOTE:  no rank is allowed)
830 Sabalu Road
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027

**Recent polls show that over 150 million Americans (over 60%) now have doubts as to whether the putative Commander-in-Chief can issue anything other than unlawful orders.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. @Elmo

    RE: GOP’s participation in the cover-up

    After the central question: Who the Prez is in reality, the most intriguing question is why the GOP participated in the fraud. Yet, there is very little discussion on this key issue. Why is it the key? Because all three branches of government, the media, the Dems, the GOP are participants in the cover-up. However, there is a slight chance that the new House members in January could be induced to look at this question. These representatives are hopefully more independent than the existing House.

    That a deal was made between the GOP and the Dems in 2008, as you suggested, is very likely. It could have originated from McCain’s birthplace-issue as you said. However, apparently, there is another more current secret policy (or at least not publicly discussed) of the GOP: The GOP leadership believers that pursuing the eligibility issue would hurt the 2012-GOP-candidates chances.

    Theodore “Ted” Frank, who was McCain’s attorney in 2008 allegedly made a statement recently, (http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/12/exposed-attorney-who-worked-on-mccain.html) when interviewed in connection with Wikipedia’s action to reclassify the Lakin-entry, that he believes that that pursuing the eligibility issue would hurt the 2012-GOP-candidates chances. One could conclude that he is not the only GOP policy maker who supports that opinion.

    Neither Ted, nor anyone else ever explained why they subscribe to this theory. Is it possible that the progressives’ Alinsky-tactic worked? It included false propaganda of accusation of race-related motivation and ridicule. Has it been that easy to gain the GOP’s continued participation in the fraud?

    It seems the answer is yes, although the full story is still very clouded.

  2. No person except a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, or a CITIZEN of the United States, AT THE TIME OF THE ADOPTION OF THIS CONSTITUTION, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

    Unless Obama is 200+ years-old, he is not eligible to run for the highest office/position, of president and vice-president of the United States… A “natural born Citizen” and “Citizen” are not the same.

    The Fourteenth Amendment only tells us who may become members of the community called the United States, i.e., those born on U.S. soil or naturalized and subject to the jurisdiction thereof are U.S. citizens. The amendment was needed because under Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1856), slaves and their descendents, whether free or not, were not considered as being members of that community even though born on U.S. soil and unlike the American Indians subject to the jurisdiction thereof. But the amendment only allowed these slaves and their descendents to become a member of the U.S. community by making them U.S. citizens. Once those persons or anybody else (e.g. Wong Kim Ark) so became a member of the U.S. community (became a U.S. citizen by birth on U.S. soil or through naturalization), then that person could join with another U.S. citizen and procreate a child on U.S. soil who would then be an Article II “natural born Citizen.”

    Hence, during the Founding, the original citizens created the new Constitutional Republic. Through Article II’s grandfather clause, they were allowed to be President. Their posterity would be the “natural born Citizens” who would perpetuate the new nation and its values. These “natural born Citizens,” born after the adoption of the Constitution, would be the future Presidents.

    Subsequently, a “natural born Citizen” was created by someone first becoming a member of the United States (a U.S. citizen) by birth on its soil to a mother and father who were U.S. citizens or if not so born then through naturalization, and then joining with another similarly created U.S. citizen to procreate a child on U.S. soil. The product of that union would be an Article II “natural born Citizen.”

    After the Fourteenth Amendment, it became sufficient to be a citizen if one were merely born on U.S. soil or naturalized and subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. That U.S. citizen would then procreate with another similarly created U.S citizen and produce a “natural born Citizen.”

    As we can see, becoming a U.S. citizen is only the first step in the process of creating a “natural born Citizen.” The second step is the two U.S citizens procreating a child on U.S. soil. It is these “natural born Citizens” who can someday be President or Vice President of the United States. Stated differently, a President must be a second generation American citizen by both U.S. citizen parents.


    To be president or vice-president you not only have to be born on U.S. Soil but you must also be born to two U.S. “Citizen” parents.

    A “natural born Citizen” is one born on soil to “Citizen” parents…

    1. That definition was referred to by congress in the Constitution. See Article 1,Sec.8:

      “Congress SHALL have power to…DEFINE and PUNISH…offenses against the Law of Nations”

      The “Law of Nations” a Treatise on International Law which dates back to Ancient Rome. Contrary to popular belief Vattel did not write it,he translated it into French and interjected some of his thoughts on the subject. He defines a Natural-Born Citizen as one born in a country of two CITIZEN Parents (with an “s”). Insofar as this is specifically incorporated into the Constitution and that is the deferred to definition,since Congress has the power to “define” offenses under the “Law of Nations” that is what Obama must have:

      1.Two parents both of whom are Americans-Jus Sanguinis
      2. Born “In” the “Country”-Jus Soli

      Two people are held to this stringent standard. A President and his Vice-President. That is the Law and it MUST be followed.

      BTW,McCain is also NOT “Natural-Born”. Contrary to popular belief, Military bases are NOT U.S. Soil.

      1. > “Congress SHALL have power to…DEFINE and PUNISH…offenses against the Law of Nations”

        Except that here, “Law of Nations” does not refer to de Vattel’s book.

        > He defines a Natural-Born Citizen

        No, he defines “indigènes” and “naturels”. Translating these as “natural born citizen” didn’t happen until after the Constitution was written. De Vattel did not use the word “citizen” (“citoyen” in French) in this context.

        > of two CITIZEN Parents

        The original French “parens” comprises more than just parents.

        > BTW,McCain is also NOT “Natural-Born”. Contrary to popular belief, Military bases are NOT U.S. Soil.

        Especially since without a DNA test, we cannot know for sure who his biological father (or Soetoro’s father, for that matter) was.

        Even if Soetoro’s birth certificate was published and showed “birthplace: Hawaii, father: Barack Obama Sr.” (or another person who was a US citizen), this wouldn’t help as fatherhood was (and is) not checked on a DNA level but simply on good faith claim by the mother.
        So even with a birth certificate there would be no proof that Soetoro’s father was a US citizen, no matter whose name appears there.
        At least if you’re following the de Vattel argument about the definition of NBC (which I am not).

        However it is more likely there is no Hawaiian birth certificate or that it shows a birthplace other than on US soil, otherwise it would have been released by now.

    2. > or if not so born then through naturalization, and then joining with another similarly created U.S. citizen to procreate a child on U.S. soil

      That does not make sense. It would assume that the child’s (!) loyalties depend on whether father and mother become US citizens one day before or one day after his birth.

      Tell me, what is the difference – concerning the child’s allegiance to the US – of the following two scenarios:

      (a) Mother and father are Kenyan citizens who become naturalized one day before the child’s birth, then change back to Kenyan citizenship one day after the child’s birth

      (b) Mother and father are Kenyan citizens who never made that one-day citizenship switch

      You’re claiming (a) makes the child an NBC whereas (b) doesn’t. But what’s the difference with regard to the child?

      I think this shows something inherently wrong with the “two citizen parents” theory, unless you expand it to mean that both parents must themselves be natural-born citizens to convey said property to the child.

  3. Obama’s birth certificate is not important. We know that Barack Obama Sr was not a US citizent therefore obama is not a natural born citizen. Open and shut case. (I am assuming that BHO Sr is Jr’s father, a fact that I do not personally believe)

    John McCain is a natural born citizen in every sense of the term.

    1. See my previous comment Ed. McCain is also NOT Natural-Born”. Military bases are NOT U.S. Soil notwithstanding and non-binding Senate resolution declaring McCain an NBC in derogation of this fact.

  4. “Citizen militias to carry out the arrests” – It’s funny how, when push comes to shove, all real authority comes down to who has the most physical firepower. People tend to be lulled into a false sense of security and don’t realize that it is the armed law enforcement and armed military that give the government its real power, not elections, not laws, not politicians, and not the people. It’s all about whose side the people with the guns are going to be loyal to.

    That is why it is so important that the people have laws they believe in and a government that abides by and enforces those laws. When the government becomes lawless, a government of men instead of a government of laws, the system breaks down and violence ensues.

    The Obama regime is doing a good job of destroying people’s faith in their government. Let us hope this thing gets turned around before things get out of control. Having LTC Lakin sit in prison as a political prisoner of the Obama regime is not helping matters.

  5. It may be that the Republican party was in agreement to turn a “blind eye” to Obama’s eligibility since they had a candidate who had problems of his own. There may have been a deal struck between the parties (which would explain the otherwise inexplicable lack of challenge from the entire Congress). Birth Certificate is the place to start – we know nothing except that Obama is being “Evasive” for some reason. But until we see the Birth Certificate (which may be only the START of the unraveling) we can prove nothing – we are only guessing at what the truth might be.

  6. I believe that a radio ad campaign should be pursued to force the issues into a very public realm to explain and demand investigation into the few clear points involved…a) Art II requires…b) SR511 defines NBC….c) Obama admits to dual citizenship and Kenyan father….d) The Constitution has been violated our system of Gov has been corrupted and violated….e) Our representatives must take action.
    Enough ads in the right markets -maybe a shift would occur to get things moving-outside of the courts, legislators, media reporters of the mainstream.

  7. Is it true to you can’t put Col Lakin’s title on his mail? That’s just mean.

    Fort Meade is in a really lib-tard area so maybe Virginia is a better choice.

    1. > Is it true to you can’t put Col Lakin’s title on his mail?

      No. Whoever came up with that idea should give some proof for it, right?
      Mrs. Rondeau replies: I received that information through an official release from Margaret Hemenway, and it has been widely distributed since the beginning of the week. Apparently it’s a regulation at Leavenworth. If anyone wishes to, it could be verified independently by calling Ft. Leavenworth.

  8. Yeah, right. The first time a militia touches ANYBODY, it gives “them” the excuse to institute nationwide martial law. There are those who firmly believe that “they” are trying to aggravate us to take the first step – thereby justifying and making righteous a dictatorial crackdown and suspension of elections until “things calm down”. If I remember my correct history right, this is how the North goaded the South into taking the first shot. Thereby forever defaming the South as being the aggressors.

    Geez, are we THIS stupid?

  9. Was George Herbert Walker Bush a NBC? There has been some interesting photos and information on the net lately that would suggest that maybe he was not. If he was/is not then what about W?

    1. > There has been some interesting photos and information on the net lately that would suggest that maybe he was not.

      Not to mention no-one has seen his birth certificate. Even if he was undoubtedly born on US soil, without a DNA test we can’t be sure as to who his biological father really was.