If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


by Ron Ewart, ©2010

Has the plan of global government arrived at a point where it cannot be stopped?

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.” — CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.

The dream of world government is as old as civilized man.  All the old warlords of the past, from the Pharaohs of Egypt to Alexander the Great, Genghis Kahn, Attila the Hun, the Romans, Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler and more had one ambition, to control the masses for as large a geographical area as their armies could conquer.  All well-known historical attempts to subjugate the masses were achieved by force of arms.

But hidden in the history books were the attempts by powerful men and wealth families who learned that vast riches were open to those who would loan money to the people and governments, especially governments.  The lust of those with the power to rule the masses always fell prey to the urge to pacify their subjects (pawns). Pacification came in the form of handouts of the bare necessities of life, such as food, water, shelter, clothing and money, but especially money.  Unfortunately, the rulers never knew where to stop in their plans to keep the natives happy and non-violent and always outspent the resources they extracted from others more productive.

The list of those who exploited the ruler’s need to keep the riff-raff and those less fortunate from rioting, is a list of who’s who of the historical financial world.   Here are a few of the more prominent ones:  Alan Rufus, De’ Medici, Fugger, Crassus, Musa I, Romanovs and the Rothchilds.  More contemporary men from the 20th Century were Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Carnegie, Astor, Ford and now Gates and Buffet.  There were others from ancient times where the total riches were unattainable such as, Croesus, Mausolus and Solomon.  A brief history of these wealthy gentlemen from history can be found here.

To give you an idea of the mentality of those who controlled the money and salivated at the idea of loaning that money to governments, here is what one of the early Rothschilds said about money: “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.” [Mayer Amschel Bauer] (1744 -1812), Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe

Some of these men made their fortunes in commodities, textiles and natural resources and then used those fortunes to lend to governments.  Some made their vast wealth from international transportation.  The early notables made their riches from shipping goods all over the world.  Later, the industrial revolution became sources for creating wealth.

Governments were only too eager to get their hands on this wealth and would pay significant interest to the lenders for the privilege.  The lenders were only too willing to lend to the governments because governments tend to be good credit risks, having the power to tax or the power to confiscate money and property by force, or by law.

The dream of powerful men is to exercise dominion over the masses and that dream requires vast sums of money to pacify the masses, as well as funding wars to subjugate more people, take more land and confiscate more resources.  And thus alliances between government and those that held the money and those that made the money, became common place.  Whenever you combine power-hungry men with those that have the money and those that make the money, powerful, centralized government, corruption, elitism, arrogance and criminality become equal partners.

Which brings us to today.  Behind the scenes we have powerful men (and women) from government, banking and industry, getting together at secret meetings all over the world.  Now what would powerful men want to talk about at these meetings?  Human nature dictates that power, money and wealth are the subjects to be discussed.  They gather together under the auspices of organizations like the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group.  Many of these individuals are also members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Here is the mission statement of the CFR:  “The Council on Foreign Relations, [established in 1921], is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its , government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.”  (Learn more here.)

Because very powerful people are members of this organization, they wield significant influence on American government policies.  Henry Kissinger, a member of the CFR, said this:  “Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.”

Just recently we learned that the Federal Reserve, the financial arm of the Federal Government, has been loaning out billions of dollars to other world banks ….. our dollars.  This is nothing more than a move towards world government, using the wealth of the American people as the means to that end.

Just a few weeks ago, we learned that the National Intelligence Council has produced a large report entitled “Global Governance 2025.”  From the Atlantic Council website we read:  “On Monday, September 20, 2010, the Atlantic Council, the U.S. National Intelligence Council (NIC), the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS), and Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN) held an event for the public release and discussion of the joint U.S.-E.U. report Global Governance 2025. This report analyzes the gap between current international governance institutions, organizations and norms and the demands for global governance likely to be posed by long-term strategic challenges over the next 15 years. The report is the product of research and analysis by the NIC and EUISS following a series of international dialogues co-organized by the Atlantic Council, TPN, and other partner organizations in Beijing, Tokyo, Dubai, New Delhi, Pretoria, Sao Paulo & Brasilia, Moscow, and Paris.”

And these folks aren’t satisfied for the move to merge America and the western world into the “global community” by 2025.  Last week, a classified update was issued bumping up the target date for Global Governance to 2015, due to increasing resistance from both American and European citizenry and the update referenced the American Tea Party movement.

Anyone who thinks that global governance is not a reality, has his (or her) head, firmly mired in quicksand.  The method to achieve global government is rooted in the United Nations Agenda 21 policies of “social justice” and “environmental protection”.  These “levers” are nothing more than a means to an end ….. one-world-order.  Even members of our own U. S. Supreme Court are stating that we must consult international law when adjudicating American law and challenges to American legislation.  Treaties are signed with other governments or international bodies that are in direct conflict with the U. S. Constitution.

The heart of American sovereignty and the foundation of our freedom will be pierced by the poison-tipped spear of the governmental, financial and industrial might and treachery of very powerful men and organizations like Trilateral, Bilderberg and CFR.

Can American sovereignty withstand the onslaught of Global Government forces?  It remains to be seen.  But let’s put it in a perspective that just about anyone can visualize.  Say that America is a unique droplet of water.  Droplets of water are generally formed around a particle of some sort.  Let’s just say that the particle that is at the heart of our American droplet of water, contains the seeds of individual freedom and liberty and a constitution that binds that individual freedom and liberty together within the particle.  Now picture that precious droplet of water poised to “fall” into an ocean and merge with every other water droplet in that ocean.  What happens to the particle that contains our individual freedom and liberty?  It is absorbed and becomes part of and homogenized with, all the other water droplets and its uniqueness and exceptionalism is silenced forever.

If Americans don’t wake up pretty damn soon, the merging of our unique water droplet with the ocean of planet-wide evil will have taken place and the final corruption of the 234-year experiment with human good, freedom, creativity and generosity will have been absorbed into the mediocrity and mindlessness of the collective, a collective for the masses created and manipulated by men of power, money and industry that inhabit the halls of centralized government.  The 5,000-year dream of world domination will have become a reality and American freedom, liberty and sovereignty will be redacted from the history books so that no other human will be tempted to challenge ….. the one-world-order.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. For years I have wondered how long the rest of the world, and I guess the PTB,
    would allow America to be #1. It appears that once we took down the USSR
    we sealed our fate to be the target of all the arrows slung, as in who to blame for
    all of the worlds current problems and strife.
    Perhaps a few more chants of “We’re Number Two” would have sufficed to re-direct
    the arrows of criticism for a bit.